 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Combining Access 2003 Queries for Dates Criteria</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/combining-queries-for-dates-criteria/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/combining-queries-for-dates-criteria/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:05:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: gcib</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/combining-queries-for-dates-criteria/#comment-85355</link>
		<dc:creator>gcib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-85355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for your responses.  I have never used a Union Query before.  I created the Union Query using SQL and did use the WHERE condition for the dates for each subquery.  It worked beautifully.  Thank you again!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your responses.  I have never used a Union Query before.  I created the Union Query using SQL and did use the WHERE condition for the dates for each subquery.  It worked beautifully.  Thank you again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msi77</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/combining-queries-for-dates-criteria/#comment-85349</link>
		<dc:creator>msi77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-85349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2 Carlosdl

&gt; Note than applying the criteria to each individual subquery could be more efficient.

I agree in the general case, but SQL Server optimizer gives identical execution plans (with predicate inside). :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 Carlosdl</p>
<p>&gt; Note than applying the criteria to each individual subquery could be more efficient.</p>
<p>I agree in the general case, but SQL Server optimizer gives identical execution plans (with predicate inside). <img src='http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlosdl</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/combining-queries-for-dates-criteria/#comment-85284</link>
		<dc:creator>carlosdl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-85284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree, a UNION should be what you are looking for.

Note than applying the criteria to each individual subquery could be more efficient.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, a UNION should be what you are looking for.</p>
<p>Note than applying the criteria to each individual subquery could be more efficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/10 queries in 0.046 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 299/305 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-22 10:18:04 -->