Comments on: Clearing the Joural Entries attached for a receiver http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/clearing-the-joural-entries-attached-for-a-receiver/ Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:14:38 +0000 hourly 1 By: abigail http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/clearing-the-joural-entries-attached-for-a-receiver/#comment-76651 abigail Fri, 30 Apr 2010 13:15:45 +0000 #comment-76651 You can regenerate a new receiver (example: CHGJRN JRN(QUSRDIRDB/QSQJRN) JRNRCV(*GEN). Dave and delete the old one(s).

]]> By: philpl1jb http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/clearing-the-joural-entries-attached-for-a-receiver/#comment-76647 philpl1jb Fri, 30 Apr 2010 07:49:43 +0000 #comment-76647 Once again, You sould
change the jrn to the next receiver
back-up the receiver
delete the receiver

Keep the backup so you can use the receiver in investigations/data corrections.
Phil

]]> By: tomliotta http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/clearing-the-joural-entries-attached-for-a-receiver/#comment-76639 tomliotta Fri, 30 Apr 2010 01:58:54 +0000 #comment-76639 Is it possible to use the same receiver by clearing the records and with out deleting it?

No.

Tom

]]> By: tomliotta http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/clearing-the-joural-entries-attached-for-a-receiver/#comment-73871 tomliotta Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:59:19 +0000 #comment-73871 Be very carefull in using this command over your production files in a fully integrated system or you will get the data out of sync if you do not get all the records in all the files backed out in the same job that wrote them in the first place.

In some ways, that would seem to be a problem with an application rather than with using the command. If the tables have proper constraints (e.g., cascading DELETEs, etc.,) and transactions are processed under commitment control, it should be more difficult to use the command wrongly.

Tom

]]> By: lovemyi http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/clearing-the-joural-entries-attached-for-a-receiver/#comment-73868 lovemyi Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:00:15 +0000 #comment-73868 Removing Journal changes RMVJRNCHG will back out transactions on the actual file and will just add additional records into the journal receiver saying that it did remove the journal changes previously added to the journal receiver. Nothing is ever deleted from the journal receiver. That is the power behind why this is still the greatest machine on the planet. :-)

Be very carefull in using this command over your production files in a fully integrated system or you will get the data out of sync if you do not get all the records in all the files backed out in the same job that wrote them in the first place.

Lovemyi

]]> By: harish.kuolkhere http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/clearing-the-joural-entries-attached-for-a-receiver/#comment-73863 harish.kuolkhere Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:35:36 +0000 #comment-73863 The Remove Journaled Changes (RMVJRNCHG) command used to remove the changes
done on Journaled Object. It is not used to clearing the Entries…!

Pls confirm whether i am correct or not…?

]]> By: philpl1jb http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/clearing-the-joural-entries-attached-for-a-receiver/#comment-73784 philpl1jb Sat, 13 Feb 2010 00:32:40 +0000 #comment-73784 I don’t understand your last message.
RMVJRNCHG is used to back out changes to the data files that are journalled
This doesn’t sound like what you were trying to do.
Phil

]]> By: kar http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/clearing-the-joural-entries-attached-for-a-receiver/#comment-73766 kar Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:42:42 +0000 #comment-73766 Actually I tried using RMVJRNCHG, but its now worked for me.

]]> By: kar http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/clearing-the-joural-entries-attached-for-a-receiver/#comment-73765 kar Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:40:29 +0000 #comment-73765 Is it possible to use the same receiver by clearing the records and with out deleting it?

]]>