1,545 pts.
 Can you get two pairs of 10/100 connections out of a four-pair Cat 5 cable?
On a Cat 5 cable with four pairs I know that you can get 10/100 TX out of one pair which is the IEEE 802 standard. But can you also utilize the other two pairs for an additional 10/100 TX network drop? Will this work? Where is it stated that you cannot do this if it does work and someone is saying it's not the IEEE standard?

Software/Hardware used:
ASKED: October 30, 2008  3:05 PM
UPDATED: December 10, 2010  6:03 PM

Answer Wiki:
It requires two pair for 100 TX. You can technically "split pairs;" however, the standards tell you not to split them behind the faceplate and that all four pairs should be terminated into a four-position jack. (This will not be an IEEE standard, but rather TIA or ISO -- whichever you follow). You can buy a splitter that is in front of the faceplate that will allow you two 10/100 connections.
Last Wiki Answer Submitted:  October 30, 2008  3:53 pm  by  Carrie Higbie   640 pts.
All Answer Wiki Contributors:  Carrie Higbie   640 pts.
To see all answers submitted to the Answer Wiki: View Answer History.


Discuss This Question:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _


 

Hi,

I have tried this and it works. However, if you plan to move to gigabit, you’ll need all 4 pairs…

BR,

Petko

 3,120 pts.

 

Yes it does work, but I would only use it in an extreme case, and not for a permanent install. You can get cross talk on it. If you are doing it as part of a wiring job for a client, I would not do it.

Coss

 60 pts.

 

Also, it will not work if the device is to work in full duplex mode. all 4 pairs are needed for this to work.

I am wondering why this question was posed, and what devices it is intended for?

For this to work, the end of the cable will have to have a longer length of pairs exposed at each end to connect the 4 devices. 2 devices connected into 1 (router/switch etc) will not work. I agree with the other warnings, and would not do it, whatever the reason.

 4,625 pts.

 

My, my, two-years-old question is revamped!

Some comments:

It’s intended for 100Mb ethernet, on existing cabling where neither additional cabling nor wireless is an option.

Pro:

Price of new cabling in an old office. Security of wired vs. wireless link. Poor quality of wireless signal in an old, thick-walled, thick-floored, weird geometry building.

Full-duplex 10/100Mb works OK – it needs only 2 pairs.

There is no significant cross-talk – at least not detrimental for 100Mb link (as long the pairs are really twisted :o )).

Splitting could be made on patch panels and double wall jacks – no cuts, no loose ends.

If no pairs are wrongly wired at the patch panel/wall jack, no problems with the switches.

Contra:

It doesn’t work for 1Gb – this one needs all 4 pairs; since nowadays every MB comes with Gb ethernet on it, soon customers would expect working at this speed with the files on fileserver: no way on a split cabling. So warn them good, if they insist on splitting.

PS:

I really used it at a customer site and they have no complains for already full 4 years.

 3,120 pts.