C language in Linux — why no interpreter?
I want to ask why 'c' language should not have Interpreter. If we use an interpreter, what will happen? .

Software/Hardware used:
ASKED: February 25, 2009  6:55 PM
UPDATED: August 7, 2011  4:01 PM

Answer Wiki:
C is almost always compiled, not interpreted. Linux does have C compilers, gcc being the most popular (it's the de facto standard).
Last Wiki Answer Submitted:  February 26, 2009  3:11 am  by  YuvalShavit   905 pts.
All Answer Wiki Contributors:  YuvalShavit   905 pts.
To see all answers submitted to the Answer Wiki: View Answer History.


Discuss This Question:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _


 

Why would you want a C-interpreter? For scripting? Why use C-syntax for scripting? Better to use Python, Ruby etc.
The only valid reason, it seems to me, is to teach C (or C++). I remember Al Stevens writing Quincy for that purpose in 1994.
CH and CINT are available as interpreters today.

 750 pts.

 

when we write a c program,it is compiled i.e, for example in turbo c we use alt +F9 to compile whereas ctrl+F7 to execute .then it is checked for runtime errors???

 10 pts.