as400 v4r5 to pc win2k pro ethernet connection

0 pts.
Tags:
AS/400
Network protocols
Networking
i connect to my as400 150 via a mini-hub. pc IP adddress is assigned by as400 DHCP. i have installed a cable modem for broadband. pc IP address now being assigned by my ISP. my connection to as400 no longer works. can i reconfigure as400 to solve this problem? can i install a 2nd pc LAN card? can you advise me what approach to take. thanks graham
ASKED: August 3, 2005  5:33 AM
UPDATED: October 31, 2009  8:29 AM

Answer Wiki

Thanks. We'll let you know when a new response is added.

A second NIC would allow the PC to do both. Never bridge (route) between them.
To allow the broadband (cable modem) to attach to the Hub and set the PC IP address [i.e 192.168.1.101] with subnet 255.255.255.0 for a range of addresses 2 to 254 (0,1,255 are reserved), would require the AS/400 to be at an address in the subnet to be visible to the PC. Since this a hub not switch the subnet problem can be sidestepped by making entries in ‘Hosts/LMHosts’.
Good Luck.

======================================================

If this is truly a hub and the IP address of the AS/400 hasn’t changed, there shouldn’t be any problem as long as you have your PC default gateway going out through the hub and you’re using the correct IP address. <b>IF</b> it’s truly a hub. IP traffic should simply flow through a hub.

If it’s not a hub, then please describe what it actually is.

I have a basic Linksys router for my house network and it uplinks to a DSL router through which my ISP assigns IP addresses. My AS/400s have fixed addresses [192.168.1.x]. This laptop has IP address 192.168.1.102. But my Linksys does NAT, so I have no idea what my external ISP-assigned address is. I have my router doing DHCP for the PCs inside.

Whatever address is handed out by the Linksys from its DHCP is handled by the Linksys via NAT whenever I need to communicate outbound.

My main PC does have two NICs — one goes to my Linksys, the other goes to a hub that sits between the Linksys and the DSL router. This allows me to have one connection that can be enabled/disabled as needed and that can connect (almost) directly to my ISP. It also can talk to the external side of my Linksys router through the hub. Technically, I can route out one NIC and in the other through the hub and my Linksys router as long as I know the NAT’d address — which will always be in the same subnet as my direct connection anyway. (My ISP will see to that of course.)

I’m not sure of the meaning of this comment above — <i>Never bridge (route) between them.</i> Seems kind of useless to have two subnets without bridging them. (If their addresses are in one of the <i>non-routable</i> ranges, bridging or NAT/routing are about the only conceptual methods of getting them to talk to each other.)

Tom

Discuss This Question:  

 
There was an error processing your information. Please try again later.
Thanks. We'll let you know when a new response is added.
Send me notifications when members answer or reply to this question.

REGISTER or login:

Forgot Password?
By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Forgot Password

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an e-mail containing your password.

Your password has been sent to:

To follow this tag...

There was an error processing your information. Please try again later.

REGISTER or login:

Forgot Password?
By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Thanks! We'll email you when relevant content is added and updated.

Following