<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AS/400</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/as400-74/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/as400-74/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:43:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: graybeard52</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/as400-74/#comment-112227</link>
		<dc:creator>graybeard52</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 22:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/as400-74/#comment-112227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would probably create a new field with either DDS or SQL, populate it with data on &quot;old&quot; field, then delete the old field.
Depending on requirement, creating a LF or SQL view might also work, although this doesn&#039;t actually change the PF]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would probably create a new field with either DDS or SQL, populate it with data on &#8220;old&#8221; field, then delete the old field.<br />
Depending on requirement, creating a LF or SQL view might also work, although this doesn&#8217;t actually change the PF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomLiotta</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/as400-74/#comment-112225</link>
		<dc:creator>TomLiotta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 22:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/as400-74/#comment-112225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Changing the name of a field is not very different from creating a new file. I would probably use CREATE TABLE ... AS ... WITH DATA. I don&#039;t know that using CHGPF has any way to retain data from the renamed field. -- Tom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Changing the name of a field is not very different from creating a new file. I would probably use CREATE TABLE &#8230; AS &#8230; WITH DATA. I don&#8217;t know that using CHGPF has any way to retain data from the renamed field. &#8212; Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philpl1jb</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/as400-74/#comment-112215</link>
		<dc:creator>philpl1jb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/as400-74/#comment-112215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sure, this might be a homework or Inverview question but it might not...
&#160;
Warning this may have an adverse impact on existing programs, queries and other uses for this file.
&#160;
1. Change the &quot;DDS&quot; source
&#160;
2. Use the CHGPF prompt it and identify source - this command will change the file and logicals that use the file format
&#160;
or 
&#160;
Use the SQL Alter Table Command
&#160;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, this might be a homework or Inverview question but it might not&#8230;<br />
&nbsp;<br />
Warning this may have an adverse impact on existing programs, queries and other uses for this file.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
1. Change the &#8220;DDS&#8221; source<br />
&nbsp;<br />
2. Use the CHGPF prompt it and identify source &#8211; this command will change the file and logicals that use the file format<br />
&nbsp;<br />
or<br />
&nbsp;<br />
Use the SQL Alter Table Command<br />
&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/8 queries in 0.048 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 297/298 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-06-19 00:34:49 -->