 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AS/400</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/as400-64/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/as400-64/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 07:52:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: abar1</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/as400-64/#comment-112056</link>
		<dc:creator>abar1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 14:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/as400-64/#comment-112056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[we had boca printers for printing tickets ... when we disconnect printers and reconnect it again a lots of messages appears in the message q say &quot;unable to obtain lock on device&quot; we tried vrycfg , wrkwtr , and other commands we tries also to change the writer configuration it says &quot; prtxx not eligible for change &quot;it takes sometimes hours to work agian i think something wrong with the system values any help ????]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we had boca printers for printing tickets &#8230; when we disconnect printers and reconnect it again a lots of messages appears in the message q say &#8220;unable to obtain lock on device&#8221; we tried vrycfg , wrkwtr , and other commands we tries also to change the writer configuration it says &#8221; prtxx not eligible for change &#8220;it takes sometimes hours to work agian i think something wrong with the system values any help ????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnAndersen</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/as400-64/#comment-111800</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnAndersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 16:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/as400-64/#comment-111800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The older Application System/400 is hardware and software bundled into one nifty package with a robust and tightly integrated database. Now it goes by &quot;IBM i&quot; even though folks still call it an AS/400 or simply a 400-John Andersen]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The older Application System/400 is hardware and software bundled into one nifty package with a robust and tightly integrated database. Now it goes by &#8220;IBM i&#8221; even though folks still call it an AS/400 or simply a 400-John Andersen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomLiotta</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/as400-64/#comment-111792</link>
		<dc:creator>TomLiotta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 12:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/as400-64/#comment-111792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;AS400 was the hardware – and OS400 the operating system.&lt;/i&gt; Not quite. An &quot;AS/400&quot; was both hardware AND software. OS/400 was just a software part of &quot;AS/400&quot;. Without OS/400, the system wasn&#039;t an AS/400. When iSeries LPARs arrived in 1999 and ran other OSes, they were no longer &quot;AS/400s&quot;. Earlier AS/400 LPARs only ran OS/400. -- Tom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>AS400 was the hardware – and OS400 the operating system.</i> Not quite. An &#8220;AS/400&#8243; was both hardware AND software. OS/400 was just a software part of &#8220;AS/400&#8243;. Without OS/400, the system wasn&#8217;t an AS/400. When iSeries LPARs arrived in 1999 and ran other OSes, they were no longer &#8220;AS/400s&#8221;. Earlier AS/400 LPARs only ran OS/400. &#8212; Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe9527</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/as400-64/#comment-111790</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe9527</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 12:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/as400-64/#comment-111790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AS400 was the hardware - and OS400 the operating system. The system mainly used green screen consoles to configure / use / operate (this is not the case now).For those that used them they were a work horse of a server than could do allot without it complaining. Also the old boxes could withstand some punishment. I have heard of a flooded server room drained and the AS400 dried out and it powerup without any real issues.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AS400 was the hardware &#8211; and OS400 the operating system. The system mainly used green screen consoles to configure / use / operate (this is not the case now).For those that used them they were a work horse of a server than could do allot without it complaining. Also the old boxes could withstand some punishment. I have heard of a flooded server room drained and the AS400 dried out and it powerup without any real issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomLiotta</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/as400-64/#comment-111788</link>
		<dc:creator>TomLiotta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 12:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/as400-64/#comment-111788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But almost everyone still calls the current systems, and the preceding systems, &quot;AS/400s&quot;. IBM hasn&#039;t managed to make the name go away. -- Tom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But almost everyone still calls the current systems, and the preceding systems, &#8220;AS/400s&#8221;. IBM hasn&#8217;t managed to make the name go away. &#8212; Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomLiotta</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/as400-64/#comment-111787</link>
		<dc:creator>TomLiotta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 12:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/as400-64/#comment-111787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;EM&gt;What kind of technology AS400 is?&lt;/EM&gt;
&#160;
An AS/400 is obsolete technology. They haven&#039;t been built for years.
&#160;
AS/400s were superseded by iSeries systems, then by System i. In 2008, the current generation, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Power_Systems&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;IBM Power Systems&lt;/A&gt;, was started.
&#160;
When built, AS/400s were midrange computer systems running the OS/400 operating system. I&#039;m not at all sure what you mean y &quot;kind of technology&quot;. What would you say the &quot;kind of technology&quot; is for a PC running Windows?
Tom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>What kind of technology AS400 is?</em><br />
&nbsp;<br />
An AS/400 is obsolete technology. They haven&#8217;t been built for years.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
AS/400s were superseded by iSeries systems, then by System i. In 2008, the current generation, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Power_Systems" rel="nofollow">IBM Power Systems</a>, was started.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
When built, AS/400s were midrange computer systems running the OS/400 operating system. I&#8217;m not at all sure what you mean y &#8220;kind of technology&#8221;. What would you say the &#8220;kind of technology&#8221; is for a PC running Windows?<br />
Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.014 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 338/341 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-18 11:25:23 -->