My gut feeling is that virtualization is part of your current IT org. From a management perspective, virtual servers are no different than other servers.
From the admin perspective, I would want clearly demarc'ed groups for virtual servers and hardware machines, just so I could instantly know what I'm looking at, but those servers are still my servers, no matter how many I have per CPU..
Last Wiki Answer Submitted: May 12, 2009 3:50 pm by CarlBrooks75 pts.
If you live outside the United States, by submitting your email address you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States.
All businesses need is yet another group to place a technology in. Many organizations have trouble separating information security from IT even though there’s an obvious need. With virtualization there’s no obvious need that I can think of so where’s the incentive?
Good point Kevin. I agree unless there is an ROI metric on moving it into another group it will never happen especially when most companies are running lean IT departments already.
For us a mid size company it falls under IT. I think it needs to get a lot bigger before we would consider moving it too a separate group.
All businesses need is yet another group to place a technology in. Many organizations have trouble separating information security from IT even though there’s an obvious need. With virtualization there’s no obvious need that I can think of so where’s the incentive?
Good point Kevin. I agree unless there is an ROI metric on moving it into another group it will never happen especially when most companies are running lean IT departments already.