 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Appending to a disconnected recordset</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/appending-to-a-disconnected-recordset/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/appending-to-a-disconnected-recordset/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:07:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: pc0der</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/appending-to-a-disconnected-recordset/#comment-40140</link>
		<dc:creator>pc0der</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-40140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whats wrong with just rerunning your recordset query?  As is sounds you need to connect to the database to query the data anyway, let it just find all new records that should be included.  I am not familiar with the updatebatch command you mention but as I understand recordsets, once the query has been done and results loaded into the recordset then the recordset is read-only till you close it.  It seems to me that you would undergo more computational headache trying to update this query (should it even be possible) then just rerunning the query. Just my humble take though... correct me if im wrong.

pC0der]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whats wrong with just rerunning your recordset query?  As is sounds you need to connect to the database to query the data anyway, let it just find all new records that should be included.  I am not familiar with the updatebatch command you mention but as I understand recordsets, once the query has been done and results loaded into the recordset then the recordset is read-only till you close it.  It seems to me that you would undergo more computational headache trying to update this query (should it even be possible) then just rerunning the query. Just my humble take though&#8230; correct me if im wrong.</p>
<p>pC0der</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.012 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 267/270 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-24 23:42:00 -->