 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ADDSVRAUTE &amp; DDM files</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/addsvraute-ddm-files/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/addsvraute-ddm-files/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:12:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: tomliotta</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/addsvraute-ddm-files/#comment-71993</link>
		<dc:creator>tomliotta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-71993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The requirements are contradictory.

You reject generic profiles due to a requirement to have transactions stamped with actual user IDs. And you reject individual user IDs because you don&#039;t want to maintain them.

One requirement or the other has to be dropped if DDM over TCP/IP is used.

Note that DDM over TCP/IP without requiring passwords opens the system to the world (as would running any server without requiring passwords). Near as I can tell, DDM isn&#039;t the appropriate technology for this. Perhaps DRDA/SQL and stored procs would be a better fit. The stored procs might accept an additional parm for job user while the connection itself would be through a generic CurrentUser. You might switch to the current user before running the update. It might be possible to do something similar over DDM, but you might need to invoke a remote program rather than update/access a remote file directly.

Tom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The requirements are contradictory.</p>
<p>You reject generic profiles due to a requirement to have transactions stamped with actual user IDs. And you reject individual user IDs because you don&#8217;t want to maintain them.</p>
<p>One requirement or the other has to be dropped if DDM over TCP/IP is used.</p>
<p>Note that DDM over TCP/IP without requiring passwords opens the system to the world (as would running any server without requiring passwords). Near as I can tell, DDM isn&#8217;t the appropriate technology for this. Perhaps DRDA/SQL and stored procs would be a better fit. The stored procs might accept an additional parm for job user while the connection itself would be through a generic CurrentUser. You might switch to the current user before running the update. It might be possible to do something similar over DDM, but you might need to invoke a remote program rather than update/access a remote file directly.</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.013 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 268/271 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-23 13:15:56 -->