Comments on: Address Book Groups

By: Address Book Groups « Domain Namez

Address Book Groups « Domain Namez — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:45:17 +0000

[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onAddress Book GroupsHere’s a quick excerpt [...]

By: Address Book Groups | Free Reverse Cell Phone Lookup

Address Book Groups | Free Reverse Cell Phone Lookup — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 06:57:53 +0000

[...] original here: Address Book Groups Author Comments [...]

By: abushahd

abushahd — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:46:59 +0000

you can also just add a character to the group name you created like (Address Book Groups 1)

By: gabe9527

gabe9527 — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:28:45 +0000

Now here is the problem…. the real one. Type ahead and Recipient names lookup are not the same. You would think that they are but not.

Each setting will override the other. Type ahead will look toward one address book (depends on the settings which one) and then normal addressbook look up will look at the other. This is a known issue (feature in Notes) and has been confusing people for a long time.

This has been addressed in version 8 with recent address lookups etc. This should also be in later version of 7.

I spent ages looking into this…. but best practice is “Do not have user and groups that match in the personal and NAB”.

By: ppolette

ppolette — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:33:42 +0000

normally with the settings described by kelvinsw, you should be prompted for the group. Be sure to select the one from local.
The selection could be complicated especially if the admins didn’t set the domain in the server group. anyway, in the “Ambiguous name” dialgo bo, you should have a button details which could help you identify the proper group.

If you’re not prompted for the group to choose … then there is a problem.

By: bankman88

bankman88 — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:51:01 +0000

We have used those settings but Notes always mails the recipients in the Server group. Thanks for your response.