 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adding a gigabit switch to a LAN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/adding-a-gigabit-switch-to-a-lan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/adding-a-gigabit-switch-to-a-lan/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:24:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: harg7769</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/adding-a-gigabit-switch-to-a-lan/#comment-47871</link>
		<dc:creator>harg7769</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-47871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks guys - I&#039;m looking at some switches just now so I&#039;ll hopefully have one arranged pretty soon and we can see if it resolves the issue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks guys &#8211; I&#8217;m looking at some switches just now so I&#8217;ll hopefully have one arranged pretty soon and we can see if it resolves the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larrythethird</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/adding-a-gigabit-switch-to-a-lan/#comment-47872</link>
		<dc:creator>larrythethird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-47872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cat 5 cable is doing just fine for my gig users and servers.  There&#039;s very little chance of getting a wire speed gig out of any single server anyway.  Unless you have hundreds of gig of ram installed, the hard drives are just not fast enough to support tranfers at that rate.    As stated in previous replies, your network is limited the to slowest connection between any two points.  Depending on your existing switch, you should still see a bit of improvement by connecting the servers and anyone transfering a lot of data to the new switch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cat 5 cable is doing just fine for my gig users and servers.  There&#8217;s very little chance of getting a wire speed gig out of any single server anyway.  Unless you have hundreds of gig of ram installed, the hard drives are just not fast enough to support tranfers at that rate.    As stated in previous replies, your network is limited the to slowest connection between any two points.  Depending on your existing switch, you should still see a bit of improvement by connecting the servers and anyone transfering a lot of data to the new switch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ramheka</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/adding-a-gigabit-switch-to-a-lan/#comment-47873</link>
		<dc:creator>ramheka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2005 08:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-47873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[cat5E supports up to a gig I think gigbit switches did appear before Cat6 which supports up to 10 GIG,usually running a gig bacbone brings an impovment to the network speed even if the clients still switching at 100Mb remember your switch is as good as its back bus as long as all your switches are uplinked at agig speed and your serves are hooked to a gig module for sure you will end up with a good overall speed]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cat5E supports up to a gig I think gigbit switches did appear before Cat6 which supports up to 10 GIG,usually running a gig bacbone brings an impovment to the network speed even if the clients still switching at 100Mb remember your switch is as good as its back bus as long as all your switches are uplinked at agig speed and your serves are hooked to a gig module for sure you will end up with a good overall speed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drillo</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/adding-a-gigabit-switch-to-a-lan/#comment-47874</link>
		<dc:creator>drillo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-47874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cat6 is the standard fro G-Bit......Cat5e is not rated fro it.  I agree putting the server and power users on the G-Bit switch is the way to go.  Then, you can plug the other switches or hubs into it as well.  You might as well use as much of the G-Bit switch to seliver as much as you can at 100 Mbits.

Paul]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cat6 is the standard fro G-Bit&#8230;&#8230;Cat5e is not rated fro it.  I agree putting the server and power users on the G-Bit switch is the way to go.  Then, you can plug the other switches or hubs into it as well.  You might as well use as much of the G-Bit switch to seliver as much as you can at 100 Mbits.</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harg7769</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/adding-a-gigabit-switch-to-a-lan/#comment-47875</link>
		<dc:creator>harg7769</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2005 12:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-47875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cat 6? Doesn&#039;t 5e work with a gig card? The server sits beside the switch anyway so re-cabling isn&#039;t an issue at the moment as I can plug straight into the switch from the server. 

It&#039;s obviously not going to be an ideal situation but would the introduction of the gigabit switch improve LAN performance to any great degree, or would I only see a real improvement if the whole network was upgraded to Cat5e/6 with gigabit NICs?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cat 6? Doesn&#8217;t 5e work with a gig card? The server sits beside the switch anyway so re-cabling isn&#8217;t an issue at the moment as I can plug straight into the switch from the server. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s obviously not going to be an ideal situation but would the introduction of the gigabit switch improve LAN performance to any great degree, or would I only see a real improvement if the whole network was upgraded to Cat5e/6 with gigabit NICs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: astronomer</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/adding-a-gigabit-switch-to-a-lan/#comment-47876</link>
		<dc:creator>astronomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2005 12:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-47876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This all depends on your architecture. If you replace the high traffic section of your network with the Gbit switch then you could get significant gains. If you leave all of the other systems on the 100Mbit switch then you have gained nothing. The way I would do this is put your main bandwidth users on the gbit switch (e.g. 10 100Mbit users and the server connected to the Gbit switch would allow all 10 to get approximately 100Mbit from the Gbit server in parallel, barring other bottlenecks). ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This all depends on your architecture. If you replace the high traffic section of your network with the Gbit switch then you could get significant gains. If you leave all of the other systems on the 100Mbit switch then you have gained nothing. The way I would do this is put your main bandwidth users on the gbit switch (e.g. 10 100Mbit users and the server connected to the Gbit switch would allow all 10 to get approximately 100Mbit from the Gbit server in parallel, barring other bottlenecks). </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.015 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 338/341 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-23 19:05:32 -->