0 pts.
 AD implementation
Would there be any benefit in implementing AD (Win2000) in a 40 user Lan environment? Thanks

Software/Hardware used:
ASKED: April 20, 2005  10:26 AM
UPDATED: April 24, 2005  3:10 PM

Answer Wiki:
If you already have a 2k server, then yes. Security and manage-ability.
Last Wiki Answer Submitted:  April 20, 2005  12:21 pm  by  Cptrelentless   0 pts.
All Answer Wiki Contributors:  Cptrelentless   0 pts.
To see all answers submitted to the Answer Wiki: View Answer History.


Discuss This Question:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _


 

In addition, if you’re using Exchange 2000, 2003, or somewhere newer, you’ll have to. Exchange 5.5 was the last version that maintained its own user directory.

Bob

 1,070 pts.

 

Here are a few reasons why I would suggest Active Directory to be implemented:

Active Directory tied into the DNS structure, and follows the DNS hierarchy for domains. Active DNS in itself makes implementing it worth the time.

The ability to create OUs and apply Group Policies by each type of group allow you to not only better manage the accounts, but also allow you alot more control over the security on the network.

Management of the domain is much quicker, as everything is controled through the MMC

As more software become active directory enabled, it makes “single sign-on” much more of a reality.

 0 pts.

 

Thanks for the prompt reply. Now my second question. I am mcse certified since 1999 but since i never implemented AD is there a manual (or something similar) that i can download to assist me. Thanks
Andre

 0 pts.

 

I am also curious too, as to his original question where he asked if there’s a manual or some sort of guideline in implementing Active Directory, any thoughts?

 0 pts.

 

I have found Microsoft’s help files a very good source of info. In 2003 Server, the help includes a check list for steps that must be taken in order to go foward.

 15 pts.