Thanks! We'll email you
when relevant content is
added and updated.
Is it assumed that in an active to active failover involving two or more nodes that there will always be a node that can receive the failover?
What happens if there isn't a node that can receive the failover because the other nodes are all maxed out?
I can understand why in an active passive failover that assumption would be valid but it seems to me that in active to active failover this would be ify?