Thanks! We'll email you
when relevant content is
added and updated.
Is it assumed that in an active to active failover involving two or more nodes that there will always be a node that can receive the failover?
What happens if there isn't a node that can receive the failover because the other nodes are all maxed out?
I can understand why in an active passive failover that assumption would be valid but it seems to me that in active to active failover this would be ify?
April 16, 2010 11:47 AM
April 19, 2010 1:52 PM