Comments on: Access 2000 Database http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/access-2000-database/ Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:25:58 +0000 hourly 1 By: astronomer http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/access-2000-database/#comment-45175 astronomer Mon, 06 Feb 2006 12:06:56 +0000 #comment-45175 Another option would be wireless. There are now products that provide bandwidth in the range you are looking for. Depending on your budget, this might be cheaper in the long run and free your DSL for internet use. I did a quick search and found a bridge set for $630 at the following link:
http://www.wirelessnetworkproducts.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=677
rt

]]> By: bobkberg http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/access-2000-database/#comment-45176 bobkberg Fri, 03 Feb 2006 18:28:20 +0000 #comment-45176 Depending on the nature of your DSL (Assymetric vs. Symetric), you may be clogging your pipe.

For a distance of 100 feet, you could almost just run a cable – unless you’re crossing a city street or railroad tracks where you get into a legal wrangle.

Just a thought,

Bob

]]> By: adaiyeg http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/access-2000-database/#comment-45177 adaiyeg Thu, 02 Feb 2006 23:09:36 +0000 #comment-45177 Thank you for responding. My ACCESS Database is 64 MB. It never grows beyond this because I archive it yearly. The documentation from the vendor says it needs to run at 100 mpbs. There are 7 concurrent users, only two will be accessing remotely. Will I need to upgrade to the SQL version to make it work as if it was being used locally? Or can I keep my current version and use a T1 for connecting? Please advise. Thanx for your time.

]]>