9117-MMA Performance

20 pts.
Tags:
9117-MMA
DS6800
OS/400
V5R4
WE have recently installed a 9117 MMA p570 which has 11 partitions, 3 of which are iSeries. All disk is on DS6800. Our performance has gone backwards on the Production iSeries partition, runtimes blown out excessively though I have seen some batch jobs running faster. We  have heard thru the grapevine tripling the memory gets better results which we have tried and had mixed results. IBM are wary this may be just masking the problem throwing extra memory at it. Since turning QPFRADJ off we have had better results. Found where increasing the Max Active in the BASE Pool helps but to what .... 1000, 10000, 20000 ??

Any thoughts on this please Performance Tuning Guru's ??!!!



Software/Hardware used:
OS/400 (V5R4), DS6800

Answer Wiki

Thanks. We'll let you know when a new response is added.

It’s surprising your performance improved after turning off QPFRADJ.
Before randomly changing the MAXACT in any pool, verify the average amount currently running in each pool.
Type WRKSBS and note which subsystems are running in each pool.
Press F11 to view the total number of active jobs in each subsystem.
Based on those totals, compare to the value for MAXACT in the WRKSYSSTS screen.
If any of those values are too low, some jobs will go to INEL state.
Increase the value to a number above the total you viewed in the WRKSBS screen.
If they’re already above the total, that is not your issue and increasing the number won’t help but be sure to use the average for the day(s).
You should start collection services to view daily reports of where the performance problems are occurring.

Discuss This Question: 1  Reply

 
There was an error processing your information. Please try again later.
Thanks. We'll let you know when a new response is added.
Send me notifications when members answer or reply to this question.

REGISTER or login:

Forgot Password?
By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy
  • graybeard52
    Performance can be a tricky thing, because it all depends on so many factors. My experience with Performance Adjuster was worse than yours. I am running several MQT builds during the night time hours over some large files with 60-70 join files. Suddenly, run time want from 2 hours to 24+ hours (did not let it finish). Here is what the problem was: SQL optimizes based on available memory, but does NOT lock that memory. Consequently my system was optimizing based on about 6G of memory. But other jobs running in QBATCH eventually consumed most of the memory, and SQL went to a near stop trying to run in justa little memory. Perf Adjust just kept pulling it away from SQL. My solution was to run SQL thru a seperate memory pool, with 2G minimum and 2G maximum. Now Perf Adjust does nothing with it, SQL optimizes at 2G and gets to keep it for the entire run. Those queries are now down to about 20 minutes each, and smaller queries have benefited as well.
    3,115 pointsBadges:
    report

Forgot Password

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an e-mail containing your password.

Your password has been sent to:

To follow this tag...

There was an error processing your information. Please try again later.

REGISTER or login:

Forgot Password?
By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Thanks! We'll email you when relevant content is added and updated.

Following