 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2008 Member Server in 2003 Domain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/2008-member-server-in-2003-domain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/2008-member-server-in-2003-domain/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 04:11:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: stevesz</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/2008-member-server-in-2003-domain/#comment-79718</link>
		<dc:creator>stevesz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-79718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[darkstar911,

I did not notice the other post by you until I posted my first reply to you. No, there are no time based rules on the FW. We all have a tendency to work strange hours, and all I care is that the work gets done, not what time you are working on it. If you want to do e-mail at 2 AM or finish that proposal for a client then, it is fine, just show up for work when you should &lt;g&gt;. (The grin is for the reason that we are a bit lax on that as well, so long as you get you time in for the week and are making us money..)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>darkstar911,</p>
<p>I did not notice the other post by you until I posted my first reply to you. No, there are no time based rules on the FW. We all have a tendency to work strange hours, and all I care is that the work gets done, not what time you are working on it. If you want to do e-mail at 2 AM or finish that proposal for a client then, it is fine, just show up for work when you should &lt;g&gt;. (The grin is for the reason that we are a bit lax on that as well, so long as you get you time in for the week and are making us money..)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevesz</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/2008-member-server-in-2003-domain/#comment-79716</link>
		<dc:creator>stevesz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-79716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Darkstar911,

DNS does not seem to be the problem. While the issue is affecting VPN and Outlook connections, it does not affect other remote connections and I am able to remote into any server I please using the FQDN. I do believe that pretty much rules out DNS issues and bandwidth issues at the router.

The DCDIAG results are kind of a red herring, but I would like ot get an answer to that issue, if it is an issue, since I do get the same results with or without the problem. 

Right now AI am in sort of a hold pattern waiting for the problem to occur again, at which time I m going to up the logging since I do not see anything in the logs indicating a problem. I am also going to run NETDIAG as well to see what may come up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darkstar911,</p>
<p>DNS does not seem to be the problem. While the issue is affecting VPN and Outlook connections, it does not affect other remote connections and I am able to remote into any server I please using the FQDN. I do believe that pretty much rules out DNS issues and bandwidth issues at the router.</p>
<p>The DCDIAG results are kind of a red herring, but I would like ot get an answer to that issue, if it is an issue, since I do get the same results with or without the problem. </p>
<p>Right now AI am in sort of a hold pattern waiting for the problem to occur again, at which time I m going to up the logging since I do not see anything in the logs indicating a problem. I am also going to run NETDIAG as well to see what may come up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darkstar911</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/2008-member-server-in-2003-domain/#comment-79697</link>
		<dc:creator>darkstar911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-79697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any time base rules on the firewall?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any time base rules on the firewall?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Featured Member: Darkstar911 - ITKE Community Blog</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/2008-member-server-in-2003-domain/#comment-79681</link>
		<dc:creator>Featured Member: Darkstar911 - ITKE Community Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-79681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Darkstar911 for helping us out around the forums for the past couple weeks. Whether it&#8217;s Windows Server 2008, Oracle, or Windows 7 in 2010, Darkstar911&#8217;s been laying down the knowledge. Thanks for [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Darkstar911 for helping us out around the forums for the past couple weeks. Whether it&#8217;s Windows Server 2008, Oracle, or Windows 7 in 2010, Darkstar911&#8217;s been laying down the knowledge. Thanks for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevesz</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/2008-member-server-in-2003-domain/#comment-79615</link>
		<dc:creator>stevesz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 07:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-79615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good guess, but no cigar. While i  cannot establish a VPN connection either, I can remote into the server by name and then log into it successfully. I can ping the server by IP and name with no problems and get sub 15ms returns.

I have placed our backup router in place, but the problem continues. One will not be able to log in form an external machine for hours or days ,then BAM!, it is fixed all on its own.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good guess, but no cigar. While i  cannot establish a VPN connection either, I can remote into the server by name and then log into it successfully. I can ping the server by IP and name with no problems and get sub 15ms returns.</p>
<p>I have placed our backup router in place, but the problem continues. One will not be able to log in form an external machine for hours or days ,then BAM!, it is fixed all on its own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/8 queries in 0.043 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 325/326 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-24 05:22:39 -->