 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 100Mbs Layer 3 Switch superior to 1Gbs standard switch?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/100mbs-layer-3-switch-superior-to-1gbs-standard-switch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/100mbs-layer-3-switch-superior-to-1gbs-standard-switch/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 01:40:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: alanbloom</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/100mbs-layer-3-switch-superior-to-1gbs-standard-switch/#comment-50389</link>
		<dc:creator>alanbloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-50389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi again
Is a L3 switch not faster at forwarding than a standard switch?  The two I have seen are a Gbs switch for £350 and a Layer 3 100Mbs for £376.  The first is obviously well suited for me and eventually, all the computers can be upgraded to Gbs speed.  Also, the L3 switch has two Gbs ports, which can be used for the servers.

For instance, I don&#039;t need VLAN features, but if a L3 switch can operate faster and it costs around the same then it may have more benefits.  I don&#039;t need to transfer large files so a low latency would be better...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi again<br />
Is a L3 switch not faster at forwarding than a standard switch?  The two I have seen are a Gbs switch for £350 and a Layer 3 100Mbs for £376.  The first is obviously well suited for me and eventually, all the computers can be upgraded to Gbs speed.  Also, the L3 switch has two Gbs ports, which can be used for the servers.</p>
<p>For instance, I don&#8217;t need VLAN features, but if a L3 switch can operate faster and it costs around the same then it may have more benefits.  I don&#8217;t need to transfer large files so a low latency would be better&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tbitner</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/100mbs-layer-3-switch-superior-to-1gbs-standard-switch/#comment-50381</link>
		<dc:creator>tbitner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-50381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Go with the GB switch and get rid of that hub!  An unmanaged GB switch is a lot cheaper than a managed L3 switch, plus you don&#039;t have a need for L3 functionality on your network.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go with the GB switch and get rid of that hub!  An unmanaged GB switch is a lot cheaper than a managed L3 switch, plus you don&#8217;t have a need for L3 functionality on your network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alanbloom</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/100mbs-layer-3-switch-superior-to-1gbs-standard-switch/#comment-50366</link>
		<dc:creator>alanbloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-50366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the comments :-)

Well, at the moment I have an old 24 port switch and a 24 port  hub (which only has the least used computers on it!).

I want to get an updated 48 port switch and the servers are 1Gbs too... :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments <img src='http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Well, at the moment I have an old 24 port switch and a 24 port  hub (which only has the least used computers on it!).</p>
<p>I want to get an updated 48 port switch and the servers are 1Gbs too&#8230; <img src='http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jurban4586</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/100mbs-layer-3-switch-superior-to-1gbs-standard-switch/#comment-50363</link>
		<dc:creator>jurban4586</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 22:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-50363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lets go back to the upgrade issue. What is your budget? If your current system has port growth left, why upgrade? Do you see growth far beyond the intial 40 hosts? Does the upgrade make sense, or can you save the money with the current config? I see no reason to upgrade. Look closer at the cost / benefit of where you are today and what an upgrade would do for you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets go back to the upgrade issue. What is your budget? If your current system has port growth left, why upgrade? Do you see growth far beyond the intial 40 hosts? Does the upgrade make sense, or can you save the money with the current config? I see no reason to upgrade. Look closer at the cost / benefit of where you are today and what an upgrade would do for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jurban4586</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/100mbs-layer-3-switch-superior-to-1gbs-standard-switch/#comment-50362</link>
		<dc:creator>jurban4586</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 22:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-50362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lets go back to the upgrade issue. What is your budget? If your current system has port growth left, why upgrade? Do you see growth far beyond the intial 40 hosts? Does the upgrade make sense, or can you save the money with the current config? I see no reason to upgrade. Look closer at the cost / benefit of where you are today and what an upgrade would do for you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets go back to the upgrade issue. What is your budget? If your current system has port growth left, why upgrade? Do you see growth far beyond the intial 40 hosts? Does the upgrade make sense, or can you save the money with the current config? I see no reason to upgrade. Look closer at the cost / benefit of where you are today and what an upgrade would do for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/10 queries in 0.041 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 331/337 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-26 06:07:41 -->