 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IT Trenches &#187; policy enforcement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/tag/policy-enforcement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 14:37:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Did you see this? &#8211; Microsoft updates Security Compliance Management Accelerator toolkit</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/did-you-see-this-microsoft-updates-security-compliance-management-accelerator-toolkit/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/did-you-see-this-microsoft-updates-security-compliance-management-accelerator-toolkit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 17:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Troy Tate</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DataCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/did-you-see-this-microsoft-updates-security-compliance-management-accelerator-toolkit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2008, I blogged about Microsoft&#8217;s release of Security Compliance Management Accelerator toolkit. Now two years later Microsoft announces an updated Security Compliance Manager. The Microsoft Security Compliance Manager is the next evolution of the Microsoft Security Compliance Management Toolkit (SCMT) Series. Microsoft has taken extensive guidance and documentation and incorporated it into this new [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2008, I blogged about <a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/did-you-see-this-microsoft-security-compliance-management-accelerator-toolkit/" target="_blank">Microsoft&#8217;s release of Security Compliance Management Accelerator toolkit</a>. Now two years later Microsoft announces an updated Security Compliance Manager. The Microsoft Security Compliance Manager is the next evolution of the Microsoft Security Compliance Management Toolkit (SCMT) Series. Microsoft has taken extensive guidance and documentation and incorporated it into this new tool, enabling you to access and automate all of your organization&#8217;s security baselines in one centralized location.  Additionally, this tool provides security baseline management features, a baseline portfolio, customization capabilities, and security baseline export flexibility to accelerate your organization&#8217;s ability to efficiently manage the security and compliance process for the most widely used Microsoft technologies.  This is a free download that can be accessed from the location below:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=en&amp;FamilyID=5534bee1-3cad-4bf0-b92b-a8e545573a3e" target="_blank">http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=en&amp;FamilyID=5534bee1-3cad-4bf0-b92b-a8e545573a3e<br />
</a><br />
According to the website:</p>
<p><strong>Security Compliance Manager Overview</strong><br />
Take advantage of the experience of Microsoft security professionals, and reduce the time and money required to harden your environment. This end-to-end Solution Accelerator will help you plan, deploy, operate, and manage your security baselines for Windows® client and server operating systems, and Microsoft applications. Access the complete database of Microsoft recommended security settings, customize your baselines, and then choose from multiple formats-including XLS, Group Policy objects (GPOs), Desired Configuration Management (DCM) packs, or Security Content Automation Protocol (SCAP)-to export the baselines to your environment to automate the security baseline deployment and compliance verification process. Use the Security Compliance Manager to achieve a secure, reliable, and centralized IT environment that will help you better balance your organization&#8217;s needs for security and functionality.</p>
<p>Key Features and Benefits</p>
<ul>
<li>Centralized Management and Baseline Portfolio: The centralized management console of the Security Compliance Manager provides you with a unified, end-to-end user experience to plan, customize, and export security baselines. The tool gives you full access to a complete portfolio of recommended baselines for Windows® client and server operating systems, and Microsoft applications. The Security Compliance Manager also enables you to quickly update the latest Microsoft baseline releases and take advantage of baseline version control.</li>
<li>Security Baseline Customization: Customizing, comparing, merging, and reviewing your baselines just got easier. Now you can use the new customization capabilities of the Security Compliance Manager to duplicate any of the recommended baselines from Microsoft-for Windows client and server operating systems, and Microsoft applications-and quickly modify security settings to meet the standards of your organization&#8217;s environment.</li>
<li>Multiple Export Capabilities: Export baselines in formats like XLS, Group Policy objects (GPOs), Desired Configuration Management (DCM) packs, or Security Content Automation Protocol (SCAP) to enable automation of deployment and monitoring baseline compliance.</li>
<li>The Security Compliance Manager Getting Started Guide is now available to download. Download this short guide to quickly set up and customize the Security Compliance Manager (SCM) tool. The guide also includes brief instructions on using the SCM tool to deploy and monitor security baselines for the latest server and client operating systems from Microsoft.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="#comments">Let me and other ITKE readers know</a> if you have tried this tool and how it worked if you did. Thanks for reading and let&#8217;s continue to be good network citizens!</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/did-you-see-this-microsoft-updates-security-compliance-management-accelerator-toolkit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tracking down that user/computer that locks AD accounts</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/tracking-down-that-usercomputer-that-locks-ad-accounts/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/tracking-down-that-usercomputer-that-locks-ad-accounts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Troy Tate</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[account management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Active Directory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-virus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antivirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diagnostics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[howto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malicious activity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Password]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[password management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scanning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[troubleshooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With an environment spanning 18+ sites and more than 3000 computers around the globe, you could understand how challenging it would be to track down what device/user might be locking user accounts. There are tools out there that you can pay for that can help do this. However, Microsoft has some free tools that with [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With an environment spanning 18+ sites and more than 3000 computers around the globe, you could understand how challenging it would be to track down what device/user might be locking user accounts. There are tools out there that you can pay for that can help do this. However, Microsoft has some free tools that with a little testing and use will permit you to quickly track down where the account is being locked and address the situation.</p>
<p>We had a situation recently where malicious software got onto a couple of machines and attempted to use the Administrator account to login. We have account lockout on our Windows 2003 AD domain, so after the appropriate number of invalid tries the Administrator account was locked out in the domain. This is because the machines were members of the domain and the malware did not distinguish the local administrator account from the domain administrator when attempting to elevate authority. Note that we use least user authority in our environment so the malware was not able to spread beyond these two machines. We suspect the machines became infected due to out of date antivirus signatures.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the antivirus we use did not alert us to the situation. The way we were alerted was by our <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/systemcenter/operationsmanager/en/us/default.aspx" target="_blank">Microsoft Systems Center Operations Manager (SCOM)</a> implementation. It notified the SCOM admin that the domain Administrator account was locked. The operations team was then tasked with tracking down what or who was locking this account. This is where the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=7AF2E69C-91F3-4E63-8629-B999ADDE0B9E&amp;displaylang=en" target="_blank">Microsoft Account Lockout and Management Tools</a> came in use and helped isolate the cause.<span id="more-144"></span></p>
<p>The first tool that we used was the LockoutStatus.exe. The screen looks like this after running and finding the Administrator account is NOT locked out. This is after I had already unlocked the account.</p>
<p><a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/files/2009/02/acctlockresults3.png"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-142" src="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/files/2009/02/acctlockresults3.png" alt="" width="450" height="277" /></a></p>
<p>As you can see it checked a lot of domain controllers. I ran this directly on one of the AD domain controllers. When an account is locked out, there will be a lockout time and an Orig. Lock domain controller listed. You can set what account you wish to check lockout on as well as what domain you want to test. The options screen looks like this.</p>
<div class="mceTemp mceIEcenter">
<dl>
<dt><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/46/files/2009/02/acctlocktarget.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-137" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/46/files/2009/02/acctlocktarget.png" alt="Set AccountLockout target" width="324" height="270" /></a></dt>
<dd>Set AccountLockout target</dd>
</dl>
</div>
<p>If the account is locked and a domain controller is listed, the next step is to run the EventCombMT tool. This tool can be used for much more than just account lockout analysis but that is the only focus of its use today. You need to specify several things in this tool to get it to find the event log records of interest.</p>
<p><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/46/files/2009/02/eventcombmt.png"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-138" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/46/files/2009/02/eventcombmt.png" alt="" width="639" height="454" /></a></p>
<p>The domain needs to be filled in. Then right-click in the Select To Search/Right Click to Add field and select what servers&#8217; event logs you wish to scan for the event of interest. In this case, I&#8217;m choosing the domain controller that is shown in the Orig.Lock column in the LockoutStatus tool. Select the Security log and the Success Audit and Failure Audit Event Types. The Event ID of 675 is the specific event of interest where the client is attempting to use a locked account. The Text field would have the account of interest.</p>
<p>One additional thing you might consider doing is to narrow down the date range. As default, the eventcombmt tool looks through all of the active logs on the server(s). So, it could take a substantial amount of time to complete the scan. The eventcombmt Options menu item has the following selections that can help you narrow down the search or tweak how the tool runs.</p>
<div class="mceTemp mceIEcenter">
<dl>
<dt><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/46/files/2009/02/eventcombmtoptions.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-141" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/46/files/2009/02/eventcombmtoptions.png" alt="EventcombMT Options" width="294" height="445" /></a></dt>
<dd>EventcombMT Options</dd>
</dl>
</div>
<p>In my case, since the LockoutStatus window would have the Lockout Time listed, I would take a time span on either side of this event. So, in this example, I used a 24 hour period from 11:37 AM yesterday, until 11:37 today.</p>
<p><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/46/files/2009/02/eventcombmtdate.png"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-139" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/46/files/2009/02/eventcombmtdate.png" alt="" width="596" height="258" /></a></p>
<p>This modifies the search criteria. Then, click Search and the application searches the event logs of the server(s) for the criteria selected.</p>
<p><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/46/files/2009/02/eventcombmtrun3.png"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-166" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/46/files/2009/02/eventcombmtrun3.png" alt="" width="639" height="462" /></a><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/46/files/2009/02/eventcombmtrun1.png"> </a></p>
<p>When eventcombmt finishes the log search, some summary statistics are displayed.</p>
<p><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/46/files/2009/02/eventcombmtfinish1.png"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-155" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/46/files/2009/02/eventcombmtfinish1.png" alt="" width="641" height="455" /></a></p>
<p>The application writes a text file to the C:\Temp folder by default. This text file contains a text file with a single line per event found matching the search criteria in the selected logs. A sample line for a search match is shown below with wrapping as needed.</p>
<blockquote><p>675,AUDIT FAILURE,Security,Wed Feb 11 05:03:15 2009,NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM,Pre-authentication failed: User Name: Administrator</p>
<p>User ID: %(<span style="color: red">sid removed for security purposes</span>) Service Name: krbtgt/domain.COM Pre-Authentication Type: 0&#215;2 Failure Code: 0&#215;18</p>
<p>Client Address: 10.xx.xx.200</p></blockquote>
<p>The Client Address may indicate another domain controller or a client machine. If it is another domain controller, then you will need to rerun the eventcombmt process against that server. If the server is across a WAN link, then consider running the eventcombmt tool directly on that server. It could take a while to search the event logs across a slow WAN link. If the Client Address is the actual suspected source, then go to the client and speak with the user about the situation. If the device or user is locking out a security principal account, then severe action may need to be taken to ensure your environment is not placed at further risk letting the device and/or user remain on the network.</p>
<p>Thanks for reading and let&#8217;s continue to be good network citizens!</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/tracking-down-that-usercomputer-that-locks-ad-accounts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did you see this? &#8211; Windows Powershell Scriptomatic tool</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/did-you-see-this-windows-powershell-scriptomatic-tool/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/did-you-see-this-windows-powershell-scriptomatic-tool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Troy Tate</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Powershell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toolkit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/did-you-see-this-windows-powershell-scriptomatic-tool/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new utility that writes Windows PowerShell scripts that harness the power of WMI (Windows Instrumentation Management) for use in system management and administration. This tool was created by Microsoft consultant and author Ed Wilson. &#160; Windows PowerShell Scriptomatic]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="downloadInfo"><a title="Description" name="Description"></a><span>A new utility that writes  Windows PowerShell scripts that harness the power of WMI (Windows  Instrumentation Management) for use in system management and administration.  This tool was created by Microsoft consultant and author Ed Wilson.</span></p>
<p class="downloadInfo">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="downloadInfo"><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=d87daf50-e487-4b0b-995c-f36a2855016e&amp;displaylang=en" target="_blank">Windows PowerShell Scriptomatic</a></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/did-you-see-this-windows-powershell-scriptomatic-tool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alternatives to e-mail attachments &#8211; SharePoint is risky!</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/alternatives-to-e-mail-attachments/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/alternatives-to-e-mail-attachments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Troy Tate</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DataManagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firewalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SharePoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/alternatives-to-e-mail-attachments/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m looking for some help on this topic and have posted a question to the ITKE community. Hopefully someone out there has had some experience with this service for your organization and can provide some valuable insight. One group I participate in is a mailing list from SANS. If you have not attended a SANS [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m looking for some help on this topic and have posted <a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/alternatives-to-email-file-attachments/" target="_blank">a question to the ITKE community</a>. Hopefully someone out there has had some experience with this service for your organization and can provide some valuable insight.</p>
<p>One group I participate in is a mailing list from <a href="http://www.sans.org" target="_blank">SANS</a>. If you have not attended a SANS event or education, then you should try to get to one of their events. They are one, if not, the premier non-vendor related security and systems administration group in the IT industry. I posed the same question to this peer group and have had some very good responses. Some suggestions for solutions have come back and include:</p>
<p><!--[if gte mso 9]&amp;gt;     Normal   0               false   false   false      EN-US   X-NONE   X-NONE                                                     MicrosoftInternetExplorer4                                                   --><!--[if gte mso 9]&amp;gt;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                --> <!--  /* Font Definitions */  @font-face 	{font-family:"Cambria Math"; 	panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; 	mso-font-charset:0; 	mso-generic-font-family:roman; 	mso-font-pitch:variable; 	mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1107304683 0 0 159 0;} @font-face 	{font-family:Calibri; 	panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4; 	mso-font-charset:0; 	mso-generic-font-family:swiss; 	mso-font-pitch:variable; 	mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1073750139 0 0 159 0;} @font-face 	{font-family:Verdana; 	panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4; 	mso-font-charset:0; 	mso-generic-font-family:swiss; 	mso-font-pitch:variable; 	mso-font-signature:536871559 0 0 0 415 0;}  /* Style Definitions */  p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal 	{mso-style-unhide:no; 	mso-style-qformat:yes; 	mso-style-parent:""; 	margin:0in; 	margin-bottom:.0001pt; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:10.0pt; 	font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; 	mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; 	mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; 	mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";} a:link, span.MsoHyperlink 	{mso-style-priority:99; 	color:blue; 	text-decoration:underline; 	text-underline:single;} a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed 	{mso-style-noshow:yes; 	mso-style-priority:99; 	color:purple; 	mso-themecolor:followedhyperlink; 	text-decoration:underline; 	text-underline:single;} .MsoChpDefault 	{mso-style-type:export-only; 	mso-default-props:yes; 	font-size:10.0pt; 	mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt; 	mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;} @page Section1 	{size:8.5in 11.0in; 	margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in; 	mso-header-margin:.5in; 	mso-footer-margin:.5in; 	mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 	{page:Section1;} --> <!--[if gte mso 10]&amp;gt;   /* Style Definitions */  table.MsoNormalTable 	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; 	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; 	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; 	mso-style-noshow:yes; 	mso-style-priority:99; 	mso-style-qformat:yes; 	mso-style-parent:""; 	mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; 	mso-para-margin:0in; 	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:11.0pt; 	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; 	mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; 	mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; 	mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; 	mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; 	mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; 	mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; 	mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; 	mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}  --><span>Microsoft Office SharePoint (<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/sharepoint/default.mspx">http://www.microsoft.com/sharepoint/default.mspx</a>)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>OpenText – Livelink (<a href="http://www.opentext.com/2/sol-products/sol-pro-llecm10.htm">http://www.opentext.com/2/sol-products/sol-pro-llecm10.htm</a>)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Webex Connect – (<a href="http://webex.com/enterprise/index.html">http://webex.com/enterprise/index.html</a>) (There are other flavors for small &amp; medium business)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> Accellion &#8211; (http://www.accellion.com)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">These are very interesting solutions and I will certainly be looking at all potential candidates. One thing that bothers me about the SharePoint option is its security capabilities. SharePoint is typically Microsoft Active Directory integrated. This has major security implications and in fact CSO magazine has posted a recent article on this topic. I recommend that you read the article and understand what risks the SharePoint solution may open for your organization.</p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><a href="http://cxolyris.cxomedia.com/t/2738521/795826/30002/0/" target="_blank">Why Security Pros Hate Microsoft SharePoint</a></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText">Microsoft&#8217;s SharePoint collaboration platform is all the rage in today&#8217;s business world, especially since third parties gained the ability to plug security holes. But managing it can still be a nightmare for IT security shops.</p>
<p class="MsoPlainText">I am still looking for more references and ideas for this solution, so please share what you are doing for your organization and it will be much appreciated by me and other readers.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/alternatives-to-e-mail-attachments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RANT: Am I responsible for training technology staff at other companies?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/rant-am-i-responsible-for-training-technology-staff-at-other-companies/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/rant-am-i-responsible-for-training-technology-staff-at-other-companies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Troy Tate</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DataCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DataManagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firewalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WAN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/rant-am-i-responsible-for-training-technology-staff-at-other-companies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may have seen in one of my past blog posts that we relocated a site over a weekend. As a result of that move we are continuing to clean-up various network access issues for services that existed in the old facility but are not available at the new facility. In the old facility some [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may have seen in one of my <a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/moving-a-datacenter-one-weekend-done/" target="_blank">past blog</a> posts that we relocated a site over a weekend. As a result of that move we are continuing to clean-up various network access issues for services that existed in the old facility but are not available at the new facility.</p>
<p>In the old facility some of the users were required to use a kiosk or standalone computer to access customer extranets using VPN. We wanted to make this easier in the new facility and get rid of the standalone computers and internet connections. As we approach each instance of VPN access, we have to ask the standard questions of what is the destination IP address and what ports need to be opened on the firewall for this service. I recently came across a customer technology staff member at another organization who was responsible for the remote access service but could not answer these standard application questions. The answer I was given was just open any-to-any ports for their destination IP (at least he knew their IP address for this service). I don&#8217;t think this was a junior staff member either answering the question. This is the person responsible for interfacing with suppliers!</p>
<p>Well, after walking around and burning off some frustration, I took some steps to try to identify how the application works and make firewall changes according to what I discovered. Working with my managed security partner I went through the following steps:</p>
<p>1. Configure a private client machine and designate as single source of traffic.</p>
<p>2. Define firewall rule to permit any traffic from this client to the destination IP.</p>
<p>3. Run VPN application  and capture details about TCP/UDP ports during the conversation.</p>
<p>4. Close the any-to-any rule and open ports discovered in step #3.</p>
<p>Well, things did work pretty well but apparently there are some other ports needed to be opened, so once again I am asking this customer to help us as their supplier to gain access to their network. We will see if I have to get someone else involved in his organization even though I was told he manages this by himself.</p>
<p>hmmmm&#8230; so have you ever had to train someone at another organization that you deal with how to do their job?</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/rant-am-i-responsible-for-training-technology-staff-at-other-companies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Operation Sentinel &#8211; Manhattan becomes &#8220;Big Brother&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/operation-sentinel-manhattan-becomes-big-brother/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/operation-sentinel-manhattan-becomes-big-brother/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 18:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Troy Tate</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeland security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/operation-sentinel-manhattan-becomes-big-brother/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hopefully you have read my previous blog entry about IT Equipment Search &#38; Seizure at US Borders. Well, if that is not enough to make you think Big Brother is here and watching, then take a look at the article NYPD seeks to screen vehicles entering Manhattan. This could be come one of the grandest [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully you have read my previous blog entry about <a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/it-equipment-search-seizure-at-the-us-borders/" target="_blank">IT Equipment Search &amp; Seizure at US Borders</a>. Well, if that is not enough to make you think Big Brother is here and watching, then take a look at the article <a href="http://www.securityinfowatch.com/online/Homeland-Security/NYPD-seeks-to-screen-vehicles-entering-Manhattan/17167SIW359" target="_blank">NYPD seeks to screen vehicles entering Manhattan.</a> This could be come one of the grandest IT endeavors of all time. How do you track these vehicles? What criteria do you capture to be able to determine a threat or not? The article mentions images and radiological readings. I think that authenticating and ensuring readings and images are accurate would create a market need for supercomputer implementations in New York City. How often are the radiological scanning devices calibrated and tested? What skills does someone need to be able to do that? Can cameras be fooled and images wrong?</p>
<p>Who is paying for all of this for NYC? Is this really where the city should be spending its dollars on risk mitigation? Maybe someone should share my <a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/managing-risk-vulnerability/" target="_blank">thoughts on managing risk &amp; vulnerability</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for your time. Let’s be good network citizens together &amp; practice safe networking!</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/operation-sentinel-manhattan-becomes-big-brother/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IT Equipment search &amp; seizure at the US borders</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/it-equipment-search-seizure-at-the-us-borders/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/it-equipment-search-seizure-at-the-us-borders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Troy Tate</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DataManagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WAN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/it-equipment-search-seizure-at-the-us-borders/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have recently been hearing some rumblings about this issue. I work for a firm with international locations and have travelled out of the country myself. So, this is a personal issue. What I am referring to is the situation described in this article by David Jonas of The Transnational: Airport Laptop Seizures Debated in [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have recently been hearing some rumblings about this issue. I work for a firm with international locations and have travelled out of the country myself. So, this is a personal issue.</p>
<p>What I am referring to is the situation described in this article by David Jonas of The Transnational: <a href="http://www.thetransnational.travel/news.php?cid=laptop-seizure.Jul-08.09 " target="_blank">Airport Laptop Seizures Debated in Washington</a>. I know that I should have nothing to worry about if I do nothing wrong like any law abiding citizen of the world. However, what about the risk to an organization&#8217;s intellectual property?</p>
<p>Look at the comment <em>&#8230;the laptop seizure policy is not analogous to physical searches of persons and  belongings at airports: &#8220;Not only does the government get access to an  unprecedented wealth of material with a laptop border search, but the government  now has the ability to copy, store and analyze that information at its leisure.  In traditional border searches, travelers carried their suitcases with them once  they cleared customs. With laptop border searches, the government can keep  everything in the computer in perpetuity.&#8221;</em> So, who is responsible for the data once it is out of the traveller&#8217;s hands? What is the care &amp; duty of the government with regards to a company&#8217;s intellectual capital?</p>
<p>This issue seems like a bureaucratic (and maybe totalitarian leaning &#8211; think &#8220;Big Brother&#8221;) nightmare! Who would be considered the appropriate person to review the data on a device? What is their liability if the device or data is damaged during their review?</p>
<p>I know I don&#8217;t have an easy answer to these nagging questions and it will take much better minds and skills than mine to work through the protection and liability issues for an organization. What mechanisms do you use to protect equipment and data during travel? Maybe this situation is a boon to shipping organizations. More people may be shipping their gear ahead of them when travelling across the border or use equipment at a remote site and transfer data across a network.</p>
<p>This situation is definitely one to watch and be concerned about as world citizens.</p>
<p>Thanks for your time. Let’s be good network citizens together &amp; practice safe networking!</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/it-equipment-search-seizure-at-the-us-borders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did you see this? &#8211; Need some Exchange advice/support</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/did-you-see-this-need-some-exchange-advicesupport/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/did-you-see-this-need-some-exchange-advicesupport/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Troy Tate</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-virus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certificate authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DataCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DataManagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital signatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[howto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outlook Web Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Powershell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toolkit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wiki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WWW]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/did-you-see-this-need-some-exchange-advicesupport/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe you have already read my post about implementing new Exchange 2007 mailboxes for over 2000 users. If not&#8230; look here. So, as you see from this event, ongoing support for these global users on a new messaging system is going to be a real challenge. I found a great blog posting with links to [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you have already read my post about implementing new Exchange 2007 mailboxes for over 2000 users. If not&#8230; look <a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/2000-users-new-mailboxes-one-weekend-done/" target="_blank">here</a>. So, as you see from this event, ongoing support for these global users on a new messaging system is going to be a real challenge.</p>
<p>I found a great <a href="http://weblog.infoworld.com/enterprisewindows/archives/2008/08/exchange_advice.html?source=NLC-ENTWINDOW&amp;cgd=2008-08-20" target="_blank">blog posting</a> with links to some excellent Exchange resources. Keep this in your toolkit for those times you just can&#8217;t find the answer elsewhere to those nagging Exchange problems. I see lots of other IT people struggling with this system and looking for support here at IT KnowledgeExchange.</p>
<p>Some other Exchange resources I recommend are:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.msexchange.org/" target="_blank">Microsoft Exchange Server Resource Site</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.archiving101.com/" target="_blank">E-mail archiving</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/atwork/manageinfo/emailtools.mspx" target="_blank">Seven ways to organize your e-mail</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.messagingtalk.org" target="_blank">MessagingTalk.org</a> &#8211; Portal for Microsoft Exchange Messaging &amp; Collaboration</p>
<p>Thanks for your time. Let’s be good network citizens together &amp; practice safe networking!</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/did-you-see-this-need-some-exchange-advicesupport/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Managing risk &amp; vulnerability</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/managing-risk-vulnerability/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/managing-risk-vulnerability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 02:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Troy Tate</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antivirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DataCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DataManagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[honeypot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/managing-risk-vulnerability/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jotting some quick thoughts here after answering a user post. Thought I would place the same information here for all to see. This list is by no means complete and your thoughts are always welcome. Some ways to measure risk include: How valuable is the asset? How much of a threat exists? What is the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jotting some quick thoughts here after answering a user post. Thought I would place the same information here for all to see. This list is by no means complete and your thoughts are always welcome.</p>
<p>Some ways to measure risk include:</p>
<p>How valuable is the asset?<br />
How much of a threat exists?<br />
What is the impact if the system/service is exploited?<br />
Is the vulnerability rated high/medium/low?<br />
Can the risk be reduced?<br />
How easily can it be reduced considering costs, technology, staffing &amp; skills?<br />
What is the probability of the vulnerability being exploited?</p>
<p>You are asking yourself:<br />
What are you protecting?<br />
What can happen to it? &#8211; How can it happen?<br />
What does it mean to the business?<br />
How can the risk be reduced?<br />
How likely is it to happen given the existing conditions?</p>
<p>Risk assessment goal: identify &amp; prioritize risks.<br />
Risk management goal: manage risks to an acceptable level. This can be done by:</p>
<ul>
<li>Mitigate: select controls; implement; monitor</li>
<li> Transfer: purchase insurance</li>
<li>Accept: do nothing</li>
<li> Avoid: discontinue activity</li>
</ul>
<p>Thanks for your time. Let’s be good network citizens together &amp; practice safe networking!</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/managing-risk-vulnerability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I know who I am &#8211; Do you know my name?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/i-know-who-i-am-do-you-know-my-name/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/i-know-who-i-am-do-you-know-my-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Troy Tate</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DataCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DataManagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[howto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscriptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[troubleshooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wiki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WWW]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/i-know-who-i-am-do-you-know-my-name/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you read my previous post then you know we recently went through a major e-mail system migration. Part of that e-mail migration included moving from various naming conventions (firstname@domain.com, firstname.lastname@domain.com, FirstInitialLastName@domain.com, etc.) to a single naming convention of firstname.lastname@domain.com. Of course this was a huge undertaking and also a political move. One thing I [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you read my previous <a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/2000-users-new-mailboxes-one-weekend-done" target="_blank">post</a> then you know we recently went through a major e-mail system migration. Part of that e-mail migration included moving from various naming conventions (firstname@domain.com, firstname.lastname@domain.com, FirstInitialLastName@domain.com, etc.) to a single naming convention of firstname.lastname@domain.com. Of course this was a huge undertaking and also a political move. One thing I am sure of is that the users will never understand the discussions taking place behind the scenes and will continue to take place about names of other non-user specific mailboxes like a project engineering team or an application mailbox.</p>
<p>Another thing which struck me during this process is that we netizens are identified by our e-mail address in many places on the web. Have you ever looked to see how many places you are identified by your e-mail address? I had to take some time and go out and change my e-mail address wherever the old one was in use. That is not a easy task let me tell you! First of all I went through the mailing lists I subscribe to. I went to their websites and tried to find the area to change my profile&#8217;s e-mail address. There are some sites where I could never find this and/or could not change it. So, webmasters &amp; publishers&#8230;. please make it easier for your subscribers to modify their e-mail address or credentials! There is this need for companies that may get purchased or change names. There is the need for the users who change names when getting married or divorced&#8230;. this should not be as difficult as I found it to be.</p>
<p>In the end, I&#8217;m not sure what I will be missing out on when we go back and clean out all of the non-standard names which we will likely do by the end of the year.</p>
<p>Thanks for your time. Let’s be good network citizens together &amp; practice safe networking!</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches/i-know-who-i-am-do-you-know-my-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
