honeypot

Sep 30 2008   1:34PM GMT

Did you see this? - Laura Chappell’s Troubleshooting & Security Summit

Posted by: Troy Tate
Networking, forensics, Security, tools, Monitoring, reporting, DataManagement, WAN, LAN, Data security, malware, SSL, performance monitoring, troubleshooting, honeypot, Performance, Network TAPs, howto, network analysis, Metrics, wireshark, risk, packet capture, research, awareness, education, toolkit

Maybe you already know Laura Chappell (The Viral Bitgirl), if not then this is your chance to meet her and gain loads of knowledge in 2 days.

On November 4-5, 2008 - Las Colinas, TX (near Dallas-Ft Worth airport) Laura will be holding a Troubleshooting and Security Summit.

In two full days you will walk away with more security, optimization and troubleshooting knowledge than you’d get after spending months in the field figuring this out.

Learn the best practices and most efficient tools to use to analyze wired and wireless network performance to optimize and secure network communications from Laura Chappell, Founder of Wireshark University and Protocol Analysis Institute. See the Summit 08 special pricing and group discount information below. Register today at www.chappellsummit.com.

Key points include:
* TCP Enhancements in Vista/Server 2008
* Faster File Transfers with SMBv1 vs. SMBv2
* Traffic Analysis between Virtualized Hosts
* Proven Techniques to Baseline the Network
* Latency Chokepoints
* Automatic Traffic Capture and Analysis
* Network Security and Forensics Procedures
* Key Points to Deploying Decoys
* Suspicious Traffic Signatures
* Handling Traffic Evidence

Bring Your Own Laptop (BYOL) Format
This hands-on lab-based course offers a series of demonstrations and individual hands-on labs to rapidly improve and expand your skill set. You will leave with your laptop loaded with tools, trace files and configured to improve network performance and security immediately after class.

GUEST SPEAKERS
*Gerald Combs, Creator of Wireshark - Must-Know Steps to Analyzing Virtualized Communications and the Future of Wireshark

* Tom Quilty, Cybercrime Investigator for BD Consulting and Investigation - Preparing for and Handling a Data Breach or Theft

Register Today - Seating is Limited
Register online at www.chappellsummit.com. Registration $1,295 - Early Bird $995 (ends midnight PDT Tuesday 9/30/08)

Group Discounts: Bring in two or more people from your company and receive $100 off each additional registration. Contact Brenda Czech at +1 408-378-7841 for more details.

Wireshark University Savings: Attendees receive the Wireshark University WSU03 Troubleshooting Network Communications self-paced course free with the student kits. Registered attendees also receive a 50%-off coupon on Wireshark University Self-Paced Courses.

Register today.
www.chappellsummit.com

If you go, please share some of the tips and tricks you gained with the ITKE population. Help spread the word!

Sep 19 2008   12:53PM GMT

Did you see this? - Encyclopedia of internal network security threats

Posted by: Troy Tate
Networking, forensics, Security, tools, Microsoft Windows, Monitoring, Browsers, web, reporting, WWW, antivirus, homeland security, Data security, malware, Policy, design, Firefox, Microsoft, website, troubleshooting, honeypot, botnet, risk, research, awareness, vulnerability, man-in-the-middle

Promisec has released an online encyclopedia of internal network security threats. This is available online for free. There is a lot of information to look through and decide how the risks affect your organization.

Take for example the entry describing GoogleTalk. The site rates it as one of the top 5 internal threats.

The more we know about these risks the better prepared we can be. Thanks for your time. Let’s be good network citizens together & practice safe networking!

Aug 14 2008   2:58AM GMT

Managing risk & vulnerability

Posted by: Troy Tate
administration, forensics, Security, Monitoring, CIO, DataCenter, DataManagement, IT education, antivirus, Data security, malware, Policy, design, honeypot, risk, policy enforcement, awareness, vulnerability

Jotting some quick thoughts here after answering a user post. Thought I would place the same information here for all to see. This list is by no means complete and your thoughts are always welcome.

Some ways to measure risk include:

How valuable is the asset?
How much of a threat exists?
What is the impact if the system/service is exploited?
Is the vulnerability rated high/medium/low?
Can the risk be reduced?
How easily can it be reduced considering costs, technology, staffing & skills?
What is the probability of the vulnerability being exploited?

You are asking yourself:
What are you protecting?
What can happen to it? - How can it happen?
What does it mean to the business?
How can the risk be reduced?
How likely is it to happen given the existing conditions?

Risk assessment goal: identify & prioritize risks.
Risk management goal: manage risks to an acceptable level. This can be done by:

• Mitigate: select controls; implement; monitor
• Transfer: purchase insurance
• Accept: do nothing
• Avoid: discontinue activity

Thanks for your time. Let’s be good network citizens together & practice safe networking!

Jul 8 2008   5:12PM GMT

Browser warnings - Danger Will Robinson! - or did it just cry “Wolf!”?

Posted by: Troy Tate
forensics, Security, Development, web, reporting, Google, WWW, IT education, antivirus, Data security, malware, Policy, Firefox, website, anti-virus, honeypot, botnet, online identity, Metrics, honeynet, policy enforcement, awareness

I sometimes browse the internet using Firefox. I say sometimes because Internet Explorer is the standard browser at my company and Firefox is not supported by IT. Well, since I work in IT, sometimes you have to test things on behalf of users and also to see how certain sites are different depending on the client browser.

Well, I recently upgraded Firefox to v3. It does seem much better than v2 although some of my useful addins are now broken (when will YSlow get fixed for v3?). One of the new features of Firefox v3 is the ability to report to the user if the visited website is a known potential malware site. This is a good feature! It provides the user with some useful information and education about the dangers on the internet. However, how accurate is this feature? What if you are visiting a trusted website that you frequently visit and now get this message?

For your information, this is the message that you will see when you attempt to visit a site deemed as risky.

Reported Attack Site!

This web site at certification.xxxxxxx.org has been reported as an attack site and has been blocked based on your security preferences.

Attack sites try to install programs that steal private information, use your computer to attack others, or damage your system.

Some attack sites intentionally distribute harmful software, but many are compromised without the knowledge or permission of their owners.

I blanked out the actual website address above. However, those of you with a bit of detective in you are likely going to figure it out.

What is interesting about this particular warning message is that it is referring to a website that has security as a guiding principle. When you see this message in Firefox, you have three options presented:

• Get me out of here!
• Why was this site blocked?
• Ignore this warning - in very tiny print at bottom of message.

I was curious as to why this site would be considered as a danger. I clicked on the Why was this site blocked? option. The report I received was interesting and as I mentioned earlier, could this be an example of someone crying “Wolf!”?

The report was as follows:

What is the current listing status for certification.xxxxxxx.org

Site is listed as suspicious - visiting this web site may harm your computer.

Part of this site was listed for suspicious activity 1 time(s) over the past 90 days.

What happened when Google visited this site?

Of the 6 pages we tested on the site over the past 90 days, 1 page(s) resulted in malicious software being downloaded and installed without user consent. The last time Google visited this site was on 07/06/2008, and the last time suspicious content was found on this site was on 07/06/2008.

Malicious software includes 1 scripting exploit(s). Successful infection resulted in an average of 3 new processes on the target machine.

Malicious software is hosted on 3 domain(s), including lokriet.com, clrbbd.com, catdbw.mobi.

1 domain(s) appear to be functioning as intermediaries for distributing malware to visitors of this site, including catdbw.mobi.

Has this site acted as an intermediary resulting in further distribution of malware?

Over the past 90 days, certification.xxxxxxx.org did not appear to function as an intermediary for the infection of any sites.

Has this site hosted malware?

No, this site has not hosted malicious software over the past 90 days.

How did this happen?

In some cases, third parties can add malicious code to legitimate sites, which would cause us to show the warning message.

Next steps:

• Return to the previous page.
• If you are the owner of this web site, you can request a review of your site using Google Webmaster Tools. More information about the review process is available in Google’s Webmaster Help Center.

This is great educational stuff, but did it really happen to this particular website? I don’t know, but apparently Google does. With the report of just one incident, does it make this site really worth the notification? How many incidents should it take before a site is considered malicious and who determines what malicious is?

Just something else to mull over in your copious time as you go perusing websites in Firefox.

Thanks for your time. Let’s be good network citizens together & practice safe networking!