<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WPA has been cracked!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant/wpa-has-been-cracked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant/wpa-has-been-cracked/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TheStanz</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant/wpa-has-been-cracked/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStanz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant/wpa-has-been-cracked/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>WPA + MAC filtering is the way I operate. I don't know how secure it is but it's better than WPA alone I suppose. I'm sure if someone is REALLY determined they can get into my network but it would almost be too much of a hassle considering there are so many WIDE open networks out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WPA + MAC filtering is the way I operate. I don&#8217;t know how secure it is but it&#8217;s better than WPA alone I suppose. I&#8217;m sure if someone is REALLY determined they can get into my network but it would almost be too much of a hassle considering there are so many WIDE open networks out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->