 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The ranting of an IT Professional &#187; Mac</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant/tag/mac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 18:30:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>MAC App Store &#8211; Getting some app&#8217;s for free</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant/mac-app-store-getting-some-apps-for-free/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant/mac-app-store-getting-some-apps-for-free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Tramer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[App store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bootleg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free app's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant/mac-app-store-getting-some-apps-for-free/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/01/07/app_store_receipt_fail/ Now I am not advocating piracy here, far from it, and I firmly believe you should pay for app&#8217;s that you use (beyond a trial grace period). This is however an interesting tale. It&#8217;s kind of hard to believe this was an oversight though.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/01/07/app_store_receipt_fail/</p>
<p>Now I am not advocating piracy here, far from it, and I firmly believe you should pay for app&#8217;s that you use (beyond a trial grace period). This is however an interesting tale. It&#8217;s kind of hard to believe this was an oversight though.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant/mac-app-store-getting-some-apps-for-free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using PAP in OSX L2TP VPN connections</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant/using-pap-in-osx-l2tp-vpn-connections/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant/using-pap-in-osx-l2tp-vpn-connections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 22:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Tramer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[L2TP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSCHAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VPN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant/using-pap-in-osx-l2tp-vpn-connections/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know some people go absolutely head over heels in love with Mac&#8217;s but personally I don&#8217;t see the appeal. They are a complete pain IMO to configure the simplest options. For example, when you are setting up a L2TP VPN connection do you think it might be helpful to set the authentication protocol as [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know some people go absolutely head over heels in love with Mac&#8217;s but personally I don&#8217;t see the appeal. They are a complete pain IMO to configure the simplest options.</p>
<p>For example, when you are setting up a L2TP VPN connection do you think it might be helpful to set the authentication protocol as something other than MSCHAP v2? Maybe you want to us PAP? Well you can&#8217;t, not in the screen any ways. Here is the convoluted MAC way of doing it.</p>
<p>Create the /etc/ppp/options file with the following contents:</p>
<p>refuse-chap</p>
<p>refuse-mschap</p>
<p>refuse-mschap-v2</p>
<p>Wow, that is just great.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant/using-pap-in-osx-l2tp-vpn-connections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bare Metal Hypervisor for Mac</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant/bare-metal-hypervisor-for-mac/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant/bare-metal-hypervisor-for-mac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 01:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Tramer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bare metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypervisor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parallels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant/bare-metal-hypervisor-for-mac/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/02/26/parallels_bare_metal_xserve/ Let me check, yup apparently still room on the band wagon, jump on in! I wonder who will release a bare metal hypervisor next, I am guessing Novell.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/02/26/parallels_bare_metal_xserve/</p>
<p>Let me check, yup apparently still room on the band wagon, jump on in!</p>
<p>I wonder who will release a bare metal hypervisor next, I am guessing Novell.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant/bare-metal-hypervisor-for-mac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google releases source code for Chrome OS</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant/google-releases-source-code-for-chrome-os/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant/google-releases-source-code-for-chrome-os/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Tramer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snow Leopard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant/google-releases-source-code-for-chrome-os/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check it out: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/19/google_chrome_os_unveiled/ This should make the open source community happy. Frankly why you would endeavour to please the open source community I am not sure. No one ever complains to that Snow Leopard isn&#8217;t open source, everyone still loves Mac&#8217;s. The demand for &#8220;open source&#8221; is mostly just a group of malcontents who [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check it out:</p>
<p>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/19/google_chrome_os_unveiled/</p>
<p>This should make the open source community happy. Frankly why you would endeavour to please the open source community I am not sure. No one ever complains to that Snow Leopard isn&#8217;t open source, everyone still loves Mac&#8217;s. The demand for &#8220;open source&#8221; is mostly just a group of malcontents who hate Microsoft&#8217;s stranglehold on the industry. Now don&#8217;t get me wrong I also hate Microsoft&#8217;s stranglehold on the industry, healthy competitions is and always will be the best motivator for innovation but I don&#8217;t have to hide that behind some kind of hippy, combuya-singing demand that companies share their corporate secrets because that makes the world a better place.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant/google-releases-source-code-for-chrome-os/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A review of Snow Leopard</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant/a-review-of-snow-leopard/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant/a-review-of-snow-leopard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Tramer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snow Leopard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant/a-review-of-snow-leopard/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Register has posted a first review of the new Mac OS called Snow Leopard. The review itself is pretty interesting though I am have personally yet to be overly impressed with any of the Mac operating systems. If your a Mac fan you will likely be stoked, if not then it might be a [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Register has posted a first review of the new Mac OS called Snow Leopard.</p>
<p>The review itself is pretty interesting though I am have personally yet to be overly impressed with any of the Mac operating systems.</p>
<p>If your a Mac fan you will likely be stoked, if not then it might be a mild curiosity.</p>
<p>Check it out here:</p>
<p>http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2009/08/25/preview_os_apple_snow_leopard/</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant/a-review-of-snow-leopard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
