<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Migrating DNS records</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant/migrating-dns-records/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant/migrating-dns-records/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Troy Tate</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant/migrating-dns-records/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy Tate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-rant/?p=117#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Another thing you can do is set the lifetime on the record to a much lower time a few days before you make the changes. This will cause the cached entries to expire quicker and new ones to be propagated faster. That's part of the reason there's a lifetime on DNS entries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thing you can do is set the lifetime on the record to a much lower time a few days before you make the changes. This will cause the cached entries to expire quicker and new ones to be propagated faster. That&#8217;s part of the reason there&#8217;s a lifetime on DNS entries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->