 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IT Career JumpStart &#187; IT employment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/tag/it-employment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:32:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Job Market Ups and Downs</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/job-market-ups-and-downs/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/job-market-ups-and-downs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 19:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Tittel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT careers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[May 2010 employment situation summary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[May 2010 IT employment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/?p=779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To me the most interesting thing about the latest Employment Situation Summary (May 2010) is that once again we&#8217;re going essentially nowhere from the preceding month. Though the numbers show a solid increase in employment for May of 431,000 jobs, 411,000 of those derive from hiring to staff up for the US Census. In fact, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me the most interesting thing about the latest Employment Situation Summary (<a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm" target="_blank">May 2010</a>) is that once again we&#8217;re going essentially nowhere from the preceding month. Though the numbers show a solid increase in employment for May of 431,000 jobs, 411,000 of those derive from hiring to staff up for the US Census. In fact, private sector employment shows a net increase of only 41,000 jobs over the previous month (less than 25% of the previous month&#8217;s growth of 195,000 jobs).</p>
<p>Given the recent downturn on global stock markets (three or more trading days in the last month have witnessed point drops in excess of 300 for the Dow Jones Industrials, and other indexes have seen multiple drops of three percentage points or greater on multiple days in this period as well) and a lackluster job growth situation, optimism about growth and recovery appear to be on the wane right now. I&#8217;m not convinced it&#8217;s once again time for total doom and gloom, but certainly a bit of caution and conservatism is called for, both for IT employers and those on the hunt for IT jobs.</p>
<p>And in fact, the information sector for May was dead flat with neither growth nor losses to report for that period. Here&#8217;s the snippet from <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t17.htm" target="_blank">Table B-1</a> that tells the information sector story:</p>
<div id="attachment_777" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 601px"><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/74/files/2010/06/header-may.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-777" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/74/files/2010/06/header-may.jpg" alt="Table B-1 Headings" width="591" height="40" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Table B-1 Headings</p></div>
<div id="attachment_778" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 601px"><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/74/files/2010/06/info-may.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-778" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/74/files/2010/06/info-may.jpg" alt="May Information numbers" width="591" height="87" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">May Information numbers</p></div>
<p>While things are going nowhere, that&#8217;s still not as scary as going down, down, down. Personally, I&#8217;m hoping to see another up month soon, and after that, a few such months in sequence wouldn&#8217;t go down badly, either.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/job-market-ups-and-downs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get Involved to Get a Job</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/get-involved-to-get-a-job/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/get-involved-to-get-a-job/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 16:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Tittel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volunteer work experience counts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volunteering can provide job opportunities and contacts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/?p=764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It might seem countintuitive for new or pending IT graduates to read that by giving of their time, skills, and knowledge they may very get something substantial in return. Although it&#8217;s unlikely that recent grads will luck into a job with the very group or organization they might choose to support with their time and [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might seem countintuitive for new or pending IT graduates to read that by giving of their time, skills, and knowledge they may very get something substantial in return. Although it&#8217;s unlikely that recent grads will luck into a job with the very group or organization they might choose to support with their time and effort, it&#8217;s important to remember that all of these outfits are staffed primarily by volunteers. Working in a volunteer group is a great way to meet people and make contacts you might never otherwise be able to make on your own.</p>
<p>Just for grins, I surfed over to my local public radio station (<a href="http://kur.org/">KUT Austin</a>) and checked out their &#8220;<a href="http://kut.org/get_involved" target="_blank">Get Involved</a>&#8221; section, where numerous volunteer organizations get the word out that they&#8217;re looking for volunteer help of all kinds — this morning, in fact, there were 61 such organizations listed, all of whom can probably use some help with computer-related tasks and activities, and some of whom focus directly on such matters (Goodwill Green Works, Austin Partners in Education, Military Children Education Coalition, Community Tax Centers, Recording for the Blind and Dyslexic, and more).</p>
<p>By reaching out to others, and giving of yourself, you not only do some good for those you seek out by volunteering. You may also do yourself some good by gaining additional experience and by making contacts that may in fact lead to a real job someday&#8211;hopefully, sooner rather than later. If your local area has a public radio station, you can use it to find volunteer opportunities easily; if not, use your favorite search engine to see what kinds of volunteer organizations are looking for help where you live.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/get-involved-to-get-a-job/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A few faint glimmers of hope, employment-wise</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/a-few-faint-glimmers-of-hope-employment-wise/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/a-few-faint-glimmers-of-hope-employment-wise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Tittel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 employment situation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT career planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT careers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[March 2010 employment situation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/?p=685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning on NPR I heard two faint glimmers of hope on the employment front. First a recent study of planned layoffs by executive placement firm Challenger Gray &#38; Christmas shows that those numbers are down to their lowest levels in four years. And second, a recent report on job losses indicates that the trend [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This morning on NPR I heard two faint glimmers of hope on the employment front. First a recent study of planned layoffs by executive placement firm Challenger Gray &amp; Christmas shows that those numbers are down to their lowest levels in four years. And second, a recent report on job losses indicates that the trend is likewise down with guesstimates for February job losses (the BLS numbers come out on Friday) at or under 20,000 for that month.</p>
<p>I take some heart from both sets of numbers. The first indicates that employers are seeing fewer reasons to trim staff than they have for quite some time. The second says that the number of jobs lost (both planned and unplanned) continues to wane. Together, these statistics tell us that things continue to improve somewhat, though we&#8217;re by no means out of losing territory (job losses and layoffs do continue, albeit at a slower pace) and onto winning ground (where, ideally not only the general jobs numbers would improve, but also where IT employment would increase as well).</p>
<p>I continue to repeat my incantation &#8220;Be calm. Stay put. Things will improve.&#8221; knowing that while we do indeed see a few small rays of sunshine, the overall forecast remains pretty grey and gloomy, all the way into 2011 and beyond. But for the first time in quite a while, I find myself looking forward to the February job numbers from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (the same BLS I mention in my first paragraph here) rather than dreading what they might portend. Let&#8217;s hope that modest or faint improvements improve somewhat themselves in the months ahead, and that the trickle of good news turns into a torrent. We could all use some encouragement, to be sure!</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/a-few-faint-glimmers-of-hope-employment-wise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jobs Outlook Picking Up But Little Improvement on the Ground</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/jobs-outlook-picking-up-but-little-improvement-on-the-ground/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/jobs-outlook-picking-up-but-little-improvement-on-the-ground/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Tittel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT employment situation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT upturn still lies ahead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturing hiring drives the job market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/?p=647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recent analyst and magazine reports (Gartner and The Economist, among others) have started to see some improvements in basic market fundamentals, including manufacturing activity. As manufacturers start exhausting inventory and forecasting increased sales, they will usually depend on overtime to ramp up production before hiring new employees for as long as they can. Recent indicators appear [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recent analyst and magazine reports (Gartner and <em>The Economist</em>, among others) have started to see some improvements in basic market fundamentals, including manufacturing activity. As manufacturers start exhausting inventory and forecasting increased sales, they will usually depend on overtime to ramp up production before hiring new employees for as long as they can. Recent indicators appear to show that things are approaching this tipping point in the US and Canada, and heading that way in Europe, which is indeed a uniformly positive sign of a real and possibly even sustainable market upturn.</p>
<p>Ultimately, an increase in manufacturing production — and hiring — stimulates the whole economy, which is why manufacturing (also known as industrial production, when the Fed reports it monthly figures for the total output of mines and factories in the USA) is considered a &#8220;leading economic indicator.&#8221; In other worlds because industrial production prefigures where the whole economy is headed, when manufacturing jobs start picking up it&#8217;s just a matter of time before jobs in other sectors, including IT, also do likewise.</p>
<p>The $64 billion question for this blog is, of course, &#8220;How much time before hiring picks up in general, and in IT in particular?&#8221; It might be as short as half a year to a full year before the coming bump in industrial hiring ripples out to the economy as a whole (that&#8217;s the time range for recent recessions from the 1980s forward to the last decade), but it could be even longer.</p>
<p>Though things now show signs that an upturn is coming, we still have to wait to see when that might happen, and how strong (and sustained) it will be. Stay tuned!</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/jobs-outlook-picking-up-but-little-improvement-on-the-ground/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>November Employment Situation Finally Shows Some Positive Signs</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/november-employment-situation-finally-shows-some-positive-signs/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/november-employment-situation-finally-shows-some-positive-signs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Tittel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT career planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT careers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT employment trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[November 2009 Employment Situation Summary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/?p=582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s the first Friday of the month, and as usual, that means the US Bureau of Labor Statistics has posted its Employment Situation Summary for the preceding month (November 2009, in this case). And finally, finally, finally it shows some itsy-bitsy, teeny-tiny signs of improvement: employment fell back by 0.2% from 10.2% to 10.0% and [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the first Friday of the month, and as usual, that means the US Bureau of Labor Statistics has posted its Employment Situation Summary for the preceding month (<a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm" target="_blank">November 2009</a>, in this case). And finally, finally, finally it shows some itsy-bitsy, teeny-tiny signs of improvement: employment fell back by 0.2% from 10.2% to 10.0% and the number of jobs lost was a mere 11,000 for the month (in the preceding quarter that same average number was 135,000 per month).</p>
<div id="attachment_584" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/74/files/2009/12/nov09-ess.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-584" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/74/files/2009/12/nov09-ess.jpg" alt="Banner from November 09 Employment Situation Summary" width="500" height="236" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Banner from November 09 Employment Situation Summary</p></div>
<p>Does this mean we&#8217;ve turned a corner, or is it just a momentary numbers glitch, caused perhaps by seasonal employment for the retail shopping season? Jobs are up in temporary help services and health care, but continue down in construction, manufacturing and — you guessed it — IT. I think it&#8217;s still too early to tell if this slight improvement represents a real turning point or if it&#8217;s just a momentary pause in a continuing downward slide. I&#8217;d want to see at least three or four consecutive months of improvement (and higher rates of reversal than these) before declaring an end to the continuing downward spiral that has been the US employment situation in general, and IT employment in particular, since the beginning of 2008.</p>
<p>That said, the decline of jobs cut for November to just 11,000 is pretty encouraging. This is the lowest such number since the recession got underway, and a big change from the numbers for August, September, and October. Also, the BLS revised the numbers for September and October to indicate that nearly 160,000 fewer jobs were lost than originally reported.</p>
<p>Cross your fingers, and hope for the best: perhaps we can see the corner that we would so very much like to turn. But for IT, my &#8220;sit tight&#8221; mantra remains as cogent as it has been all year long.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/november-employment-situation-finally-shows-some-positive-signs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do Temp Job Upswings Lead the Permanent Job Market?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/do-temp-job-upswings-lead-the-permanent-job-market/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/do-temp-job-upswings-lead-the-permanent-job-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Tittel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[coping with job loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[increase in temp jobs may lead employment recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT employment trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October 2009 employment situation summary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/?p=535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Numerous observers of the employment scene (and the regular monthly US BLS Employment Situation Summary) noticed a potential ray of sunshine in last week&#8217;s otherwise gloomy report — namely, an upswing of 34,000 temporary jobs. Some analysts view this kind of activity as a market predictor, which means that when temp job numbers start going up, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Numerous observers of the employment scene (and the regular monthly US BLS Employment Situation Summary) noticed a potential ray of sunshine in last week&#8217;s otherwise gloomy report — namely, an upswing of 34,000 temporary jobs. Some analysts view this kind of activity as a market predictor, which means that when temp job numbers start going up, permanent job numbers generally start to follow this trend (see, for example, the reporting on the <strong><em>Employment Spectator</em></strong> entitled &#8220;<a href="http://www.employmentspectator.com/2009/11/temp-jobs-up-in-october/" target="_blank"><strong>Temp Jobs up in October</strong></a><strong>&#8220;).</strong></p>
<p>Even more encouraging, says the aforementioned source, is that temp job numbers for manufacturing increased. That&#8217;s because &#8220;increases in manufacturing tend to lead to increases in retail, customer service, and call center jobs as more products hit the marketplace.&#8221; But I&#8217;m not 100% that this is an unambiguous statistic, because temp jobs are also a fallback for those unemployed who are willing to accept just about any kind of work to keep some money coming in. I&#8217;d be interested to know how many of those temp workers lost their original permanent positions in the last 18 months before taking this observation as an unalloyed harbinger of growth and recovery.</p>
<p>That said, you can&#8217;t argue that an upswing in manufacturing (which creates goods for sale, and does indeed create the kind of pull-through phenomena in sales, customer service, and call centers to which the Employment Spectator refers in my preceding quote from that source). But with around 15.7 million people unemployed in the US, 34,000 temp jobs doesn&#8217;t go very far to help turn things around, either. It will be interesting to see if this represents a genuine trend, and if we&#8217;ll see those numbers keep ramping up for a while, or if this turns out to be a glitch (or seasonal hiring for the holiday retail season as might very well be the case).</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/do-temp-job-upswings-lead-the-permanent-job-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GDP Up, But Employment Keeps Dropping</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/gdp-up-but-employment-keeps-dropping/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/gdp-up-but-employment-keeps-dropping/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Tittel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[coping with IT job loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT career planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT careers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT employment situation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT skills development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/?p=531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I understand things correctly a recession is considered to be over when a quarterly GDP report returns to positive terrritory. With a forecast return for this quarter to a positive growth rate, by some metrics that means the recession is over. But that probably explains why About.com includes these paragraphs in its discussion of [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I understand things correctly a recession is considered to be over when a quarterly GDP report returns to positive terrritory. With a forecast return for this quarter to a positive growth rate, by some metrics that means the recession is over. But that probably explains why About.com includes these paragraphs in its <a href="http://economics.about.com/cs/businesscycles/a/depressions.htm" target="_blank">discussion of recessions and depressions</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The standard newspaper definition of a recession is a decline in the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) for two or more consecutive quarters.</p>
<p>This definition is unpopular with most economists for two main reasons. First, this definition does not take into consideration changes in other variables. For example this definition ignores any changes in the unemployment rate or consumer confidence. Second, by using quarterly data this definition makes it difficult to pinpoint when a recession begins or ends. This means that a recession that lasts ten months or less may go undetected.</p></blockquote>
<p>By the other metrics tagged in the quote&#8217;s second paragraph — namely, unemployment rate and consumer confidence — this recession is most emphaticallyl <strong>NOT</strong> over. Consumer confidence dipped in <a href="http://www.conference-board.org/economics/consumerConfidence.cfm" target="_blank">September and October</a>, and unemployment rates have continued to climb by fits and starts all year long with decreases for both August and <a href="http://www.stats.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm">September </a>as well. Many economists and even President Obama continue to predict that unemployment rates will top 10 percent by the end of the year or in the first quarter of next year (of course, with the current rate at 9.8%, that&#8217;s no huge jump in rates either).</p>
<p>What does this mean for IT workers? Repeat my mantras from earlier postings on this very same topic. For those currently employed in IT that goes something like this: &#8221;Be cool. Stay put. Hone your skills. Wait for things to improve.&#8221; For those who want to work in IT, either on a first job or to get themselves back to work, it sounds like &#8220;Be cool. Look harder. Hone your skills (and consider some training or back to school). Wait for things to improve.&#8221; Given that the employment market is normally quiescent between Thanksgiving and New Years (except for part-time seasonal employment) that definitely means that &#8220;hunker down&#8221; remains the watchword of the day.</p>
<p>Please join me in wishing for improvement and real growth in IT jobs for 2010.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/gdp-up-but-employment-keeps-dropping/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looking for work with the Feds? Think &#8220;Security Clearance!&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/looking-for-work-with-the-feds-think-security-clearance/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/looking-for-work-with-the-feds-think-security-clearance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Tittel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT careers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Federal Security Clearance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Military Security Clearance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/?p=470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me start today&#8217;s blog with an upfront disclaimer: though obtaining a security clearance may sound like a good idea to anybody considering some kind of civilian position with the US government, you can&#8217;t get one on your own. Obtaining a security clearance requires the active consent and participation of the Feds, and can only [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me start today&#8217;s blog with an upfront disclaimer: though obtaining a security clearance may sound like a good idea to anybody considering some kind of civilian position with the US government, you can&#8217;t get one on your own. Obtaining a security clearance requires the active consent and participation of the Feds, and can only be granted for those who work in government agencies or who contract to same (usually through large specialist companies that specialize in providing contract human capital for government use, sometimes called &#8220;Beltway bandits&#8221;). You can&#8217;t go out and get one on your own.</p>
<p>That said, one of the biggest hurdles to obtaining a security clearance is getting through the background check. Here&#8217;s where a potential silver lining lurks for military or ex-military personnel: if you&#8217;ve ever had a security clearance, your odds of getting one as a civilian go up enormously AND the background check only needs to pick up after the data when your last clearance was granted. This can be a huge boon for those who&#8217;ve already been awarded such clearances, even if that occurred some time ago (of course, your criminal and financial record must be blemish-free since then, but that shouldn&#8217;t be too big a hurdle for most people).</p>
<p>If you want to learn more about this fascinating subject, please consult one or more of the following articles:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.taonline.com/securityclearances/" target="_blank">Security Clearances </a>TAOnline.com (undated)</li>
<li><a href="http://usmilitary.about.com/od/theorderlyroom/l/blsecmenu.htm" target="_blank">Security Clearance Guidelines</a> About.com (undated) (see also <a href="http://usmilitary.about.com/cs/generalinfo/a/security.htm" target="_blank">Security Clearance Secrets</a>)</li>
<li>Typical description of legal services in aid of obtaining clearance from The Marbury Law Group, under the heading <a href="http://ram.timberlakepublishing.com/content.asp?contentid=472" target="_blank">Security Clearances </a>(many, many legal firms provide such services: this is just an example).</li>
<li><a href="http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?tag=defense-contractors" target="_blank">Security Clearance Jobs Blog</a> (dates vary)</li>
<li>Security Clearance Manual, Chapters <a href="http://lastpostpublishing.com/securityclearancemanual_chapter1.aspx" target="_blank">1</a> &amp; <a href="http://lastpostpublishing.com/securityclearancemanual_chapter10.aspx" target="_blank">10</a>, (undated)</li>
<li><a href="http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090412211231AAonUd6">How long does my security clearance last &#8230; </a>? Yahoo! Answers (April, 2009)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/answers/technology/information-technology/information-security/TCH_ITS_ISC/442491-13132027?browseCategory=TCH_ITS_ISC" target="_blank">How can I obtain Government Security Clearance</a>? Linked-in Answers (April, 2009)</li>
</ul>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/looking-for-work-with-the-feds-think-security-clearance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The July 2009 Employment Situation Finally Posts</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/the-july-2009-employment-situation-finally-posts/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/the-july-2009-employment-situation-finally-posts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 14:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Tittel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[coping with job loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT employment indicators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT employment situations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT employment trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[July 2007 Employment Situation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/?p=380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The markets and their followers have been abuzz with anticipation of the US Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment Situation Summary for July 2009, which just hit the Web and the newswires at 8:30 AM EDT this morning. Although analysts had anticipated a climb in the unemployment rate from 9.4 to as high as 9.7 percent, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The markets and their followers have been abuzz with anticipation of the US Bureau of Labor Statistics <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm" target="_blank">Employment Situation Summary for July 2009</a>, which just hit the Web and the newswires at 8:30 AM EDT this morning. Although analysts had anticipated a climb in the unemployment rate from 9.4 to as high as 9.7 percent, the lead paragraph includes the following very cheery items, which I expect should buoy those markets substantially today:</p>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;the unemployment rate was little changed at 9.4 percent&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;the average monthly job loss for May through July (-331,000) was about half the average decline for November through April (-645,000)&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;nonfarm payroll employment continued to decline in July (-247,000)&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<p>The last item actually appears first in the original source, but I list it last so I can remark that this is the lowest monthly job loss in quite some time. The ongoing trend that things are not as bad as they were before is continuing, though we&#8217;re still losing rather than gaining jobs.</p>
<p>Not all the items in this report are necessarily cheery, however. Here are some that might give pause to the inevitable thoughts about recovery, and let us know how far we have to go to regain equilibrium and move beyond into true economic and job growth:</p>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;the number of long-term unemployed (those jobless for 27 weeks or more) rose by 584,000 over the month to 5.0 million&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;in July, 1 in 3 unemployed persons were jobless for 27 weeks or more&#8221;</li>
<li><a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t11.htm" target="_blank">Table A-11</a> indicates that unemployment in the &#8220;information&#8221; industry stands at 11.5 percent (as compared to 4.1 percent in July 2008), and in the &#8220;professional and business services&#8221; industry stands at 10.9 percent (as compared to 6.1 percent in July 2008) <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t17.htm" target="_blank">Table B-4</a> indicates that average hourly earnings in Information declined by 0.5 percent, and increased in Professional and Business Sevices by 0.2 percent.</li>
</ul>
<p>What does all this mean? With a total of 15 million Americans still unemployed, things remain tough all over, particularly in IT, where things are somewhat worse than they are overall. It&#8217;s still time to sit tight, stay put, and keep an eye out for trouble heading your way. Hopefully all the talk about and longing for recovery will translate into tangible signs of same soon.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/the-july-2009-employment-situation-finally-posts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s Laying Off Right Now?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/whos-laying-off-right-now/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/whos-laying-off-right-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Tittel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Career planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coping with job loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT 2009 employment outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT career planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT employment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/?p=273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To try to get a sense of who&#8217;s still letting people go in IT, I turned to the Employment Spectator&#8217;s IT news items and to an old favorite, the TechCrunch Layoff Tracker. Although as I heard it said on NPR yesterday things aren&#8217;t getting as bad right now as quickly as they had been, we&#8217;re [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To try to get a sense of who&#8217;s still letting people go in IT, I turned to the <a href="http://www.employmentspectator.com/tag/information-technology/" target="_blank">Employment Spectator&#8217;s IT news items </a>and to an old favorite, the <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/layoffs/" target="_blank">TechCrunch Layoff Tracker</a>. Although as I heard it said on NPR yesterday things aren&#8217;t getting as bad right now as quickly as they had been, we&#8217;re not exactly on easy street just yet. Keep that in mind as you look at these May 2009 layoff listings.</p>
<div style="text-align: center">
<table border="1" cellspacing="4" cellpadding="4" width="400" summary="Listing of May 2009 layoffs">
<caption>May 2009 Layoffs</caption>
<tbody></tbody>
<thead>
<th>Company</th>
<th>Date</th>
<th>#/%age</th>
<th>Source</th>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Autodesk</td>
<td>5/22/09</td>
<td>430/unk</td>
<td>ES</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sutter Health</td>
<td>5/18/09</td>
<td>121/unk</td>
<td>ES</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>HP</td>
<td>5/19/09</td>
<td>6,420/2%</td>
<td>NY Times</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CA</td>
<td>5/14/09</td>
<td>3,100/unk</td>
<td>ES</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Seagate</td>
<td>5/13/09</td>
<td>1,100/3%</td>
<td>Reuters</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MySpace</td>
<td>5/13/09</td>
<td>45/3%</td>
<td>TechCrunch</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dimension Data</td>
<td>5/13/09</td>
<td>70/unk</td>
<td>ES</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Perot Systems</td>
<td>5/6/09</td>
<td>450/unk</td>
<td>ES</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p>Admittedly, this is not as dire as Q4 of 2008, or even Q1 of this year, but it&#8217;s not yet cause for dancing in the streets. With some big, well-known names in the list&#8211;especially HP. Autodesk, CA, and Perot Systems&#8211;it&#8217;s clear that some savvy corporate forecasters are still prognosticating rough waters ahead. In the meantime, please stay buckled up!</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-jobs/whos-laying-off-right-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
