Jun 5 2009 8:40PM GMT
Posted by: Robert E. Davis
Internet,
Internet Governance,
Trust Management,
Information Asset Protection,
Information Security Governance,
Intellectual Property Right,
World Trade Organization,
World Intellectual Property Organization,
DRM,
IAP,
ISG,
IPR,
WTO,
WIPO
As previously stated, DRM software is generally considered an access control technology deployed to limit unauthorized usage. However, arguably, a technology cannot in principle, know what legal restrictions and rights apply in a specific jurisdiction, allowable usage context, contractual conditions, or the individual author, owner, or publisher without human intervention. Therefore, as with other information assets protection related software, vulnerabilities may exist that can be exploited by unscrupulous or curious individuals.
Even if adequate IPR security protection is deployed, based on the laws of judgmental probability, widely-used DRM systems eventually yield to hackers and crackers intent on defeating or circumventing deployed access controls. Supporting this projected outcome is Internet advertised software allowing DRM circumvention. However, those with an interest in preserving DRM systems have attempted to initiate proceeding restricting the distribution and development of information piracy enabled software.
“View Part I of the Digital Rights Management series here“
Jun 2 2009 3:44PM GMT
Posted by: Robert E. Davis
Internet,
Internet Governance,
Trust Management,
Information Asset Protection,
Information Security Governance,
Intellectual Property Right,
World Trade Organization,
World Intellectual Property Organization,
IAP,
ISG,
IPR,
WTO,
WIPO
Intellectual property protection has ushered in an era of technological solutions that attempt to prevent asserted rights infringement. Digital Rights Management (DRM) can be considered a response to legal requirements which criminalize the production and dissemination of technology that allows individuals to circumvent technical copy-restriction methods. Specifically, as a preventive control, DRM software usually manages the downloading of sound files, movies, and other copyrighted materials through diverse security features. Globally, DRM systems have received international legal reinforcement through the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Copyright Treaty (WCT) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) national implementations.
“View Part I of the Digital Rights Management series here“
May 29 2009 7:40PM GMT
Posted by: Robert E. Davis
Internet,
Internet Governance,
Trust Management,
Information Asset Protection,
Information Security Governance,
Intellectual Property Right,
IAP,
ISG,
IPR
Intellectual property right (IPR) issues affect Information Security Governance as well as Internet Governance deployments through a direct impact on ‘ Trust Management ‘. Since knowledge and ideas are an important part of cultural heritage, social interaction and business transactions, they retain a special value for many societies. Logically, if the associated electronically formatted information is valued, preventive and detective measures are necessary to ensure minimum organizational impact from an IPR security breach.
May 26 2009 6:14PM GMT
Posted by: Robert E. Davis
Internet,
Electronic Commerce,
Message Integrity,
Business-to-Business,
Business-to-Consumer,
Business-to-Employee,
Business-to-Government,
Electronic Data Interchange,
Public Key Infrastructure,
Uniform Commercial Code,
E-commerce,
B2B,
B2C,
B2E,
B2G,
EDI,
PKI,
UCC
EDI is commonly defined as the transfer of data between different companies utilizing networks. For the vast majority of entities, enhanced transactional traceability, reliability, and accessibility are derived EDI benefits; but without appropriate controls, communication interdependency can elevate legal, security and operational risks. As an accepted remedial risk measure, public key infrastructure (PKI) is the primary technological resource permitting E-commerce portable trust. However, to achieve E-commerce security transparency requires an appropriate trading partner compatibility solution that addresses various entity-centric encryption and digital signature techniques.
“View Part I of the Electronic Commerce series here“
May 22 2009 7:00PM GMT
Posted by: Robert E. Davis
Internet,
Electronic Commerce,
Message Integrity,
Business-to-Business,
Business-to-Consumer,
Business-to-Employee,
Business-to-Government,
Electronic Data Interchange,
Uniform Commercial Code,
E-commerce,
B2B,
B2C,
B2E,
B2G,
EDI,
UCC
EDI between trading partners can be interpreted as legally binding contracts. For instance, when a transaction is initiated by one of the trading partners, such as a purchase order, it constitutes an “offer”. In turn, if a trading partner agrees to supply the merchandise requested, it normally is considered “acceptance” of the offer. Thus, interpretively, under the U.S. Uniform Commercial Code a contract between buyer and seller is established.
Regarding effective security, two topics have gained notoriety: managerial ease and portable trust. Managerial ease focuses on making the security infrastructure’s integration and utilization with various applications transparent to enable adoption by trading parties. Portable trust supports telecommunication links with external parties through faith in resource authorizations and reliable message delivery. Inadvertent data loss during transmission reduces the cost savings generally associated with EDI deployment. Furthermore, message integrity issues can jeopardize connectivity status.
“View Part I of the Electronic Commerce series here“
May 19 2009 7:52PM GMT
Posted by: Robert E. Davis
Internet,
Electronic Commerce,
Business-to-Business,
Business-to-Consumer,
Business-to-Employee,
Business-to-Government,
Electronic Data Interchange,
E-commerce,
B2B,
B2C,
B2E,
B2G,
EDI
Delineated, B2B is E-commerce between discernibly distinct entities. B2B links enable the exchange of products, services, or information between entities. Cascading down, Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) methodologies are the precursors and pillars of Internet integrated B2B relationships. Depending on activity frequency and application, EDI control risk can become material. Where EDI is implemented, lack of direction, reliance on third parties, and system dependencies potentially expose an entity to additional legal, security, and operational risks.
“View Part I of the Electronic Commerce series here“
May 15 2009 6:48PM GMT
Posted by: Robert E. Davis
Internet,
Electronic Commerce,
Business-to-Business,
Business-to-Consumer,
Business-to-Employee,
Business-to-Government,
E-commerce,
B2B,
B2C,
B2E,
B2G
With an ever-increasing number of organizations and individuals relying on the Internet to exchange confidential and sensitive information, adequate message security continues to be a technological management concern. Serviceable standard electronic commerce (E-commerce) models include Business-to-Business (B2B), Business-to-Consumer (B2C), Business-to-Employee (B2E), and Business-to-Government (B2G) architectures. In order to programmatically manage E-commerce related IT security risks, management must designate an information assets protection perimeter. Axiomatically, the primary purpose of establishing a security perimeter is to provide a defined ambit for entity-centric policies and safeguards. However, with the advent of E-commerce, erecting layered protective barriers that preserve IT configurations can introduce a tactical security quagmire.