 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The musings of an IT Consultant &#187; quick motion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-consultant/tag/quick-motion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-consultant</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 01:19:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Hyper-V and NIC teaming and Quick Migration</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-consultant/hyper-v-and-nic-teaming-and-quick-migration/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-consultant/hyper-v-and-nic-teaming-and-quick-migration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 23:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Raj Perumal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ESXi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyper-V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIC TEaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quick Migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quick motion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Update 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMWare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-consultant/hyper-v-and-nic-teaming-and-quick-migration/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently Microsoft&#8217;s new Hyper-V product is not compatible with NIC teaming. I hope Microsoft quickly resolves this as not being able to team NICS to provide redundancy in 24/7 servers is a big issue. Also another area where Microsoft seems to be deficient is with Quick Migration. VMWare&#8217;s VMotion allows you to quickly migrate a [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently Microsoft&#8217;s new Hyper-V product is not compatible with NIC teaming. I hope Microsoft quickly resolves this as not being able to team NICS to provide redundancy in 24/7 servers is a big issue.</p>
<p>Also another area where Microsoft seems to be deficient is with Quick Migration. VMWare&#8217;s VMotion allows you to quickly migrate a virtual machine to another ESX host so you can perform maintenance on the original host. Microsoft&#8217;s Quick Migration should enable the same thing but people have been running into major issues with it as the process has caused some issues causing administrators much grief.</p>
<p>I recently have spoken with many people who are going the Hyper-V route because it&#8217;s &#8220;free&#8221;. I have to argue that now that VMWare&#8217;s ESXi is free, people really have no excuse not to go with VMWare based on their proven track record in the industry. These people are quick to point out the recent debacle with Update 2 but then you can&#8217; t tell me that Microsoft hasn&#8217;t royally screwed up a patch in the past either. At the end of the day I still say that VMWare is your best bet at this point in time to keep your servers running smoothly.</p>
<p>-RP</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-consultant/hyper-v-and-nic-teaming-and-quick-migration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft relaxes licensing around virtual mobility for 41 server applications</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-consultant/microsoft-relaxes-licensing-around-virtual-mobility-for-41-server-applications/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-consultant/microsoft-relaxes-licensing-around-virtual-mobility-for-41-server-applications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Raj Perumal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[41 server applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Application server license mobility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX 3.5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyper-V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Microsoft Licensing and Support Eases Path to Virtu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quick motion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual machines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual mobility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual mobility licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMWare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-consultant/microsoft-relaxes-licensing-around-virtual-mobility-for-41-server-applications/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi folks, before when you had to move virtual machines from one server to another using technologies like vmotion you had to ensure you had a license for the server applications on both host physical servers. The only way you could move this was if you did it once every 90 days. Microsoft has now [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi folks, before when you had to move virtual machines from one server to another using technologies like vmotion you had to ensure you had a license for the server applications on both host physical servers. The only way you could move this was if you did it once every 90 days.</p>
<p>Microsoft has now announced that they have removed the 90 day restriction and are allowing moving of virtual machines between host physical servers for 41 server applications. They call it &#8220;Application Server License Mobility&#8221;.</p>
<p>This is great news for the virtual world and Microsoft has obviously done this only now due to Hyper-V. Like I said before, this competition can only be good for the consumer. When licensing expensive server application products this can save a significant amount of money in your IT budget!</p>
<p>You can read about this further at these links:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2008/aug08/08-19EasyPathPR.mspx?rss_fdn=Press%20Releases">Microsoft Press Release regarding the relaxing of it&#8217;s license policy</a></p>
<p><a href="http://download.microsoft.com/download/3/d/4/3d42bdc2-6725-4b29-b75a-a5b04179958b/Application_Server_License_Mobility_VL_Brief.doc">Microsoft: Application Server License Mobility (word doc)</a></p>
<p>-Raj</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-consultant/microsoft-relaxes-licensing-around-virtual-mobility-for-41-server-applications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
