 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s the point of the System i blade?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/iseries/whats-the-point-of-the-system-i-blade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/iseries/whats-the-point-of-the-system-i-blade/</link>
	<description>A Search400.com blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 20:55:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: tim messink</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/iseries/whats-the-point-of-the-system-i-blade/#comment-456</link>
		<dc:creator>tim messink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iseries.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/02/19/what-exactly-is-the-point-of-the-system-i-blade/#comment-456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What about the JS22 and storage?, it is my understanding that the JS22 has SAN storage and currently the way the Iseries would see the storage is via the LUNDs, one drive arm per LUND. as far as query goes, if disk arms are busy, performance will drop. With only 32 available, this will be a concern. Additionally, theonly SANs that work are IBM DS4XXX and DS8xxx, which are costly..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the JS22 and storage?, it is my understanding that the JS22 has SAN storage and currently the way the Iseries would see the storage is via the LUNDs, one drive arm per LUND. as far as query goes, if disk arms are busy, performance will drop. With only 32 available, this will be a concern. Additionally, theonly SANs that work are IBM DS4XXX and DS8xxx, which are costly..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: psu calculator</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/iseries/whats-the-point-of-the-system-i-blade/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>psu calculator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iseries.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/02/19/what-exactly-is-the-point-of-the-system-i-blade/#comment-455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;We are running SAP on our iSeries. We currently have an i570 that 
is nearing capacity on all 16 processors.&quot;

Same here, and our IT is setting up blade server as we speak!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We are running SAP on our iSeries. We currently have an i570 that<br />
is nearing capacity on all 16 processors.&#8221;</p>
<p>Same here, and our IT is setting up blade server as we speak!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Welch</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/iseries/whats-the-point-of-the-system-i-blade/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Welch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iseries.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/02/19/what-exactly-is-the-point-of-the-system-i-blade/#comment-454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are running SAP on our iSeries. We currently have an i570 that is nearing capacity on all 16 processors. I was toying with the idea of perhaps using a blade to run our SAP Portals on which I believe would keep us &quot;legal&quot; for replicating w/Mimix the Blade LPAR w/o purchasing more licenses. I&#039;m thinking that SAP Portals likes a lot of memory and CPU but I think I&#039;d be lucky to fully utilize 2 of the 4 cores with a limitation of 32 GB ram.

Question - does a blade raise your P rating on the i570?  

I&#039;d like to hear feedback about if this sounds reasonable or if you have other ideas that might make more sense. I&#039;m not optimistic about the announcements including a 20-way Power6 i570.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are running SAP on our iSeries. We currently have an i570 that is nearing capacity on all 16 processors. I was toying with the idea of perhaps using a blade to run our SAP Portals on which I believe would keep us &#8220;legal&#8221; for replicating w/Mimix the Blade LPAR w/o purchasing more licenses. I&#8217;m thinking that SAP Portals likes a lot of memory and CPU but I think I&#8217;d be lucky to fully utilize 2 of the 4 cores with a limitation of 32 GB ram.</p>
<p>Question &#8211; does a blade raise your P rating on the i570?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to hear feedback about if this sounds reasonable or if you have other ideas that might make more sense. I&#8217;m not optimistic about the announcements including a 20-way Power6 i570.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
