http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/eye-on-oracle/soa-in-09-dead-alive-or-in-search-of-new-meaning/ A SearchOracle.com blog Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:22:23 +0000 hourly 1 http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/eye-on-oracle/soa-in-09-dead-alive-or-in-search-of-new-meaning/#comment-1385 osymad Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:54:07 +0000 http://eyeonoracle.blogs.techtarget.com/2009/01/19/soa-in-09-dead-alive-or-in-search-of-new-meaning/#comment-1385 Architecture still being white elephant, i think SOA will change this 2009 to bring us a better (currently does not exists) integration between Customer requirements… but not only functional ones even business needs like deliveries, milestones and some other administrative contraints to build a quality architecture design. By the other hand SOA must be standarize its concepts to avoid misunderstanding between “Architects” , business analyst programmers and developers.

]]> http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/eye-on-oracle/soa-in-09-dead-alive-or-in-search-of-new-meaning/#comment-1384 Grant Czerepak Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:21:10 +0000 http://eyeonoracle.blogs.techtarget.com/2009/01/19/soa-in-09-dead-alive-or-in-search-of-new-meaning/#comment-1384 Any architecture centered on any single aspect of business is destined to fail. SOA is just another example of this. I was never in support of SOA. I never saw Service centrism as a solution. Data centrism was equally bound to fail. Event centrism was bound to fail. All aspects of a system need to be addressed: Goals, Actors, Events, Locations, Services, Products, Units, Measures, Currency, Amounts. Until we develop an architecture that addresses this correctly, instead of seeking a panacea in centrism, we are destined to architect white elephants.

]]>