 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why is KVM in Feisty Fawn?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/why-is-kvm-in-feisty-fawn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/why-is-kvm-in-feisty-fawn/</link>
	<description>A SearchEnterpriseLinux.com blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 02:36:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Page</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/why-is-kvm-in-feisty-fawn/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 01:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/why-is-kvm-in-feisty-fawn/#comment-48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello, I Found this blog from a Google search to run Kernel-based Virtual Machine. I am running Feisty Fawn Beta, and I have long (10 years) since been a full time Linux user. I am not converting to Linux at this stage. Having said that, the reason I would like to run XP under KVM are so I can run some design tools, specifically illustrator and quark xpress. I design my own artwork exclusively with Inkscape and The Gimp, however I exchange files with other designers quite a bit that I need access to, so I can either change the format to something that will work in Gimp, or so I can generate a file to be sent to the printing press. I have not attempted wine, because I have used wine very much in the past, and would rather a solid experience running the application in its native environment. I hope this helps you understand why Ubuntu, or any other distribution might include KVM in their distro.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, I Found this blog from a Google search to run Kernel-based Virtual Machine. I am running Feisty Fawn Beta, and I have long (10 years) since been a full time Linux user. I am not converting to Linux at this stage. Having said that, the reason I would like to run XP under KVM are so I can run some design tools, specifically illustrator and quark xpress. I design my own artwork exclusively with Inkscape and The Gimp, however I exchange files with other designers quite a bit that I need access to, so I can either change the format to something that will work in Gimp, or so I can generate a file to be sent to the printing press. I have not attempted wine, because I have used wine very much in the past, and would rather a solid experience running the application in its native environment. I hope this helps you understand why Ubuntu, or any other distribution might include KVM in their distro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Dolan</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/why-is-kvm-in-feisty-fawn/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Dolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 03:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/why-is-kvm-in-feisty-fawn/#comment-47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KVM is in the mainline kernel - every distro will include it. It has no real correlation to Windows so I&#039;m not sure why the focus on Windows other than it can run a virtual Windows instance just like a Linux instance. KVM essentially turns the Linux instance into a hypervisor. With KVM, there&#039;s no need to use Xen. You can run multiple virtual Linux servers (or desktop instances). Even for desktop instances though, KVM is more likely to power a hosted client server where multiple desktop clients would run on the server vs traditional fat clients. KVM is a bit early though for server usage - will be some time before it&#039;s widely used or feature competitive to Xen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KVM is in the mainline kernel &#8211; every distro will include it. It has no real correlation to Windows so I&#8217;m not sure why the focus on Windows other than it can run a virtual Windows instance just like a Linux instance. KVM essentially turns the Linux instance into a hypervisor. With KVM, there&#8217;s no need to use Xen. You can run multiple virtual Linux servers (or desktop instances). Even for desktop instances though, KVM is more likely to power a hosted client server where multiple desktop clients would run on the server vs traditional fat clients. KVM is a bit early though for server usage &#8211; will be some time before it&#8217;s widely used or feature competitive to Xen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
