 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Enterprise Linux Log &#187; OpenOffice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/tag/openoffice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux</link>
	<description>A SearchEnterpriseLinux.com blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:16:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Open source office suites: LibreOffice takes on OpenOffice</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/open-source-office-suites-libreoffice-takes-on-openoffice/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/open-source-office-suites-libreoffice-takes-on-openoffice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[LibreOffice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenOffice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/?p=1153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has now been one year since The Document Foundation (TDF) announced the LibreOffice project, and by all counts, the open source software suite is flourishing. After just one year, TDF estimates that there are now 25 million LibreOffice users worldwide. The project has also seemed to generate a lot of interest from developers. Just [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span>It has now been one year since The Document Foundation (TDF) announced the LibreOffice project, and by all counts, the open source software suite is flourishing. After just one year, TDF estimates that there are now 25 million LibreOffice users worldwide.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>The project has also seemed to generate a lot of interest from developers. Just last week version 3.4.3 debuted with some significant security fixes –- a reminder that the project is still young, but also evidence that it is continuing to evolve. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>All this attention on LibreOffice now raises the question of what will become of <a href="http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/news/2240036820/Open-source-fans-disagree-on-impact-of-Oracles-OpenOffice-divestiture">another popular open source software project</a>. </span></p>
<blockquote>
<p class="textbody" align="left"><span>&#8220;Thanks to a very welcoming attitude to newcomers, to the copyleft license, and to the fact that it is not requesting any copyright assignment, The Document Foundation has attracted more developers with commits in the first year than the OpenOffice.org project in the first decade,&#8221; said Norbert Thiebaud, a member of TDF Engineering Steering Committee.</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="textbody" align="left"><span>In Sept. 2010, developers who were critical of <span><span>Oracle Corp.’s perceived lack of commitment to OpenOffice decided to split and create LibreOffice. <a href="oracle-passes-openofficeorg-on-to-the-apache-software-foundation">Oracle handed off the OpenOffice project</a> to the Apache Software Foundation earlier this year, leaving some concerned that it would languish as many developers joined LibreOffice instead. </span></span></span></p>
<p class="textbody" align="left"><span><span>Now, it looks like much of that concern was justified. Just as LibreOffice is celebrating its first birthday and releasing major upgrades, OpenOffice –- </span></span><span>apparently hurting for money after being dumped by Oracle -<span><span>–</span></span> is planning a <a href="http://www.sys-con.com/node/2014436">major fundraising campaign</a> for this month. </span></p>
<p class="textbody" align="left"><span>Obviously, it’s too early to say that OpenOffice is in decline, and the project will almost certainly generate large donations. But, now that it’s clear LibreOffice isn’t going away anytime soon, many users and developers could start turning away from OpenOffice.</span></p>
<p class="textbody" align="left">What do you think? Will OpenOffice be revived by the Apache Foundation? Is having multiple open source office suite products good for end-users? If you switched from OpenOffice to LibreOffice, why? We&#8217;d love to hear your thoughts.</p>
<p class="textbody" align="left"><em>Follow us on <a href="http://twitter.com/LinuxTT">Twitter</a>!</em></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/open-source-office-suites-libreoffice-takes-on-openoffice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle passes OpenOffice.org on to the Apache Software Foundation</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/oracle-passes-openofficeorg-on-to-the-apache-software-foundation/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/oracle-passes-openofficeorg-on-to-the-apache-software-foundation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 22:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leah Rosin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenOffice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun microsystems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/?p=1039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oracle has contributed the OpenOffice.org code to the Apache Software Foundation&#8217;s (ASF) Incubator, marking the end of Oracle ownership of the popular Sun legacy open source project. But, Oracle may retain the trademark as the agreement only mentions the code. The &#8220;donation&#8221; of the code to ASF was met coolly by The Document Foundation (TDF), [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oracle has contributed the <a href="http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/statements-on-openofficeorg-contribution-to-apache-nasdaq-orcl-1521400.htm">OpenOffice.org code</a> to the Apache Software Foundation&#8217;s (ASF) Incubator, marking the end of Oracle ownership of the popular Sun legacy open source project. But, Oracle may retain the trademark as the agreement only mentions the code. </p>
<p>The &#8220;donation&#8221; of the code to ASF was met coolly <a href="http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2011/06/01/statement-about-oracles-move-to-donate-openoffice-org-assets-to-the-apache-foundation/">by The Document Foundation</a> (TDF), the organization of developers that spun off <a href="http://www.libreoffice.org/">LibreOffice</a> in September 2010 from OpenOffice in response to Oracle&#8217;s handling of the project, including the decision to charge for the previously free Open Document Format plugin that allowed interoperability between OpenOffice and Microsoft Office suite. TDF <a href="http://www.documentfoundation.org/supporters/">lists its supporters</a>, which include most of the big names in Linux: Red Hat, Canonical, Novell, Google and more.</p>
<p>TDF issued a statement, explaining that this move was not all they had hoped for:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Document Foundation would welcome the reuniting of the OpenOffice.org and LibreOffice projects into a single community of equals in the wake of the departure of Oracle. The step Oracle has taken today was no doubt taken in good faith, but does not appear to directly achieve this goal. The Apache community, which we respect enormously, has very different expectations and norms – licensing, membership and more – to the existing OpenOffice.org and LibreOffice projects. We regret the missed opportunity but are committed to working with all active community members to devise the best possible future for LibreOffice and OpenOffice.org.</p></blockquote>
<p>This move by Oracle doesn&#8217;t seem to be as &#8220;open&#8221; claim in its press materials on the matter, and TDF&#8217;s grumblings won&#8217;t go unnoticed by the open source community. One of the key hang-ups is the change of software licensing under Apache. Previously, OpenOffice code was licensed under the GPL, LGPLv3 and MPL. Under Apache&#8217;s license, modifications to the code do not need to be given back, which contrasts with the previous licensing versions.</p>
<p>Notably, <a href="http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/34638.wss">IBM is supporting the move</a>, and Bob Sutor has issued his own <a href="http://www.sutor.com/c/2011/06/some-remarks-on-openoffice-going-to-apache/">analysis and reaction</a> on his blog. </p>
<p><em>More on OpenOffice and ASF</em><br />
<a href="http://searchoracle.techtarget.com/news/2240016151/Will-Oracle-support-Suns-OpenOffice-desktop-application-suite">Oracle watchers speculate on future of OpenOffice</a></p>
<p><a href="https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/incubation_at_apache_what_s">ASF Incubator: What does that mean?</a></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/oracle-passes-openofficeorg-on-to-the-apache-software-foundation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft win for OOXML could undermine open source</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/microsoft-win-for-ooxml-could-undermine-open-source/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/microsoft-win-for-ooxml-could-undermine-open-source/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dkr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux blogs and news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux versus Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open source applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenOffice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechTarget Blogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/microsoft-win-for-ooxml-could-undermine-open-source/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Friday, Aug. 15, the software behemoth from Redmond, Wash., won another victory over open source, when the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission gave the go-ahead to Microsoft’s alternative Office Open XML (OOXML) document format. The organizations rejected appeals by four countries (Brazil, South Africa, Venezuela and India) because they [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Friday, Aug. 15, the software behemoth from Redmond, Wash., won another victory over open source,  when the <a href="http://www.iso.org" title="International Organization for Standards">International Organization for Standardization (ISO)</a> and the International Electrotechnical Commission gave the go-ahead to Microsoft’s alternative Office Open XML (OOXML) document format. The organizations rejected appeals by four countries (Brazil, South Africa, Venezuela and India) because they failed to obtain two-thirds membership support for their position. The four objectors contended that procedural violations last February invalidated the subsequent April 1 boards&#8217; approval of the Microsoft-sponsored standard. OOXML opponents also argue that the addition of a second document format standard will undermine the Open Document Format (ODL) developed earlier by the open source community. However, the ISO contends that its approval of two standards will give the market the opportunity to choose between the two alternatives.</p>
<p>Since when has Microsoft been in favor of choice? Like the choice of eat or be eaten. . . .</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/microsoft-win-for-ooxml-could-undermine-open-source/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OpenOffice: Take your pick</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/openoffice-take-your-pick/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/openoffice-take-your-pick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ITKE</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux blogs and news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open source applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenOffice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/openoffice-take-your-pick/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While OpenOffice.org celebrates its seventh year with a new release, someone put his fork in OpenOffice&#8217;s birthday cake. Go-oo get OpenOffice The Go-oo version of OpenOffice.org promises new, in-development features and functionality not incorporated into OpenOffice’s releases. According to SearchEnterpriseLinux.com expert Solveig Haugland’s blog, the split is the result of a long-standing disagreement over licensing [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While OpenOffice.org celebrates its seventh year with a new release, someone put his fork in OpenOffice&#8217;s birthday cake.</p>
<p><strong>Go-oo get OpenOffice</strong></p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.go-oo.org/" target="_blank">Go-oo version of OpenOffice.org</a> promises new, in-development features and functionality not incorporated into OpenOffice’s releases. According to SearchEnterpriseLinux.com expert <a href="http://openoffice.blogs.com" target="_blank">Solveig Haugland’s blog</a>, the split is the result of <a href="http://openoffice.blogs.com/openoffice/2007/10/sun-staroffice-.html" target="_blank">a long-standing disagreement over licensing of a Calc module</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Latest OpenOffice.org a major release</strong></p>
<p>In a recent tip on SearchEnterpriseLinux.com, Haugland has also done a great job reviewing <a href="http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid39_gci1275483,00.html" target="_blank">the newest features of OpenOffice.org 2.3</a>. OpenOffice.org 2.3 includes several features and improvements, including security enhancements.</p>
<p>The latest release also includes an expanded extension library. The multiplatform OpenOffice.org is compatible with all major office suites, which means you can work with your existing .doc files easily with the open source Writer application. SearchEnterpriseLinux.com contributor Serdar Yegulalp reminds us that this refers to the Microsoft Word 97 2003 format, “which retains a core set of features which are compatible across the iteration” of the proprietary product.</p>
<p><strong>OpenOffice.org blogosphere</strong></p>
<p>In addition to Haugland’s tips and advice on SearchEnterpriseLinux and her own blog, the OpenOffice.org Web site keeps <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/editorial/blogs.html”" target="_blank">a list of helpful OpenOffice.org blogs</a>. If you know of any others, <a href="mailto:mgallagher@techtarget.com?subject=OpenOffice.org%20blog">let us know</a>.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/openoffice-take-your-pick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OpenOffice 2.4 goes stable on Gentoo</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/openoffice-24-goes-stable-on-gentoo/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/openoffice-24-goes-stable-on-gentoo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ITKE</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise applications for Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open source applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenOffice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Updates and upgrades]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/openoffice-24-goes-stable-on-gentoo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OpenOffice 2.4 went stable on Gentoo this week. Version 2.4 includes a lot of security fixes as well as new features to make the upgrade worthwhile for anyone. The ability to control your stored passwords in OO with a master password is a nice one in my security oriented mindset.One caveat that I have found [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://download.openoffice.org/" target="_blank">OpenOffice 2.4</a> went stable on <a href="http://www.gentoo.org" target="_blank">Gentoo</a> this week. Version 2.4 includes a lot of <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/security/bulletin.html" target="_blank">security fixes</a> as well as <a href="http://development.openoffice.org/releases/2.4.0.html" target="_blank">new features</a> to make the upgrade worthwhile for anyone.  The ability to control your stored passwords in OO with a master password is a nice one in my security oriented mindset.One caveat that I have found when upgrading that doesn&#8217;t directly relate to upgrade OpenOffice itself, but having upgraded my <a href="http://java.sun.com" target="_blank">JRE</a>.  OpenOffice didn&#8217;t seem to pick up on the new path and was still  trying to use <code>/opt/sun-jdk-1.6.0.03/jre</code> after I had upgraded to 1.6.0.05 which resulted in OpenOffice always telling me that my JRE was broken.  Removing <code>~/.ooo-2.0/user/config/javasettings_Linux_x86.xml</code> and <code>~/.ooo-2.0/user/registry/cache/org.openoffice.Office.Java.dat</code> then resetting the JRE from within OpenOffice fixed the issue.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/openoffice-24-goes-stable-on-gentoo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
