Backup & Recovery archives - Enterprise Linux Log

Enterprise Linux Log:

Backup & recovery

Jun 17 2008   7:00PM GMT

SEP adds online backup for VMware



Posted by: Pam Derringer
disaster recovery, Virtualization, VMware, DataCenter, DataManagement, Backup & recovery, Enterprise applications for Linux, Linux blogs and news, Open source applications, Administration, interoperability and integration

SEP Software LLC, a German-based company with U.S. headquarters in Boulder, Colo., has introduced SEP Sesam 3.4 backup and recovery software with additional support for VMware this week at the fourth annual Red Hat Summit. Known primarily in Europe, the company has expanded its U.S. presence for about 18 months.

According to SEP Software President Tim Wagner, the new version runs on Red Hat, Novell SUSE, Debian, Ubuntu and other open source operating systems and is very easy to use in a cross-platform environment. Unlike its competitors, SEP Sesam 3.4 enables users to back up and recover virtualized data online.

SEP already supports all major hardware, operating systems and databases, but it has now extended to virtualized data and can be installed as a guest for concurrent backups if the user already has another backup product, Wagner said. SEP provides snapshot backups for VMware, requiring only one installation per VMware host. Installation and subsequent backup and recovery operations are quick and easy to do. Backups also can be performed within a storage area network.

In addition, SEP enables users to migrate data from disk to disk to tape and transfer data securely over the network via AES 256 encryption and decryption. An administrative application program interface provides access to all servers and their data.

Prices start at $377 per server and $214 per client. Online groupware and database modules start at $845 to $3,845, depending on operating system and hardware manufacturer.

Jun 3 2008   9:46AM GMT

Ubuntu Server receives positive reviews



Posted by: Caroline Hunter
support, Backup & recovery, Ubuntu Linux, Linux blogs and news, Interviews, Updates and upgrades, Administration, interoperability and integration

Ubuntu isn’t just for desktops. Behind the scenes, corporate IT managers have put Ubuntu to work on servers. Don’t believe me? Well, I can name names. I can also tell you up front that Ubuntu Server gets high marks for its corporate support; easy backups, installs and upgrades; documentation, and more. 

So I set out to find some IT pros who could talk about Ubuntu Server, which wasn’t hard. I just asked, “Who’s using Ubuntu?”  in a SearchEnterpriseLinux.com newsletter. Here are some respondents’ views of Ubuntu Server, both positive and not-so-positive.

In the past, Linux has gotten dinged for poor corporate-level support; but Canonical Ltd. — Ubuntu’s corporate parent — got support right with Ubuntu’s Long Term Support (LTS), according to Jim Read, an IT administrator for a financial institution.  “We have stuck with 6.06 LTS, and it has worked well,” Read said. If he changed support providers, he’d have to do major system reconstruction, but LTS 6.06 hasn’t given him a reason to consider a change.

Another common point in Ubuntu’s favor is its ease of use, particularly with upgrades and backups.

 ”Backups are so very simple, there is lots of advice about what to back up other than data so that server recovery is reasonably straightforward,” said Iain McKeand, IT systems administrator at Oxford Policy Management.

One admin has had such a smooth Ubuntu upgrading experience that he will upgrade even though he doesn’t have to. His Ubuntu servers “just sit there cranking” and don’t have to have “the latest stuff,” but he’s found that the Ubuntu upgrade process is painless and easy.  “We’re going to upgrade the 6.06 machines within the next few months as time allows,” he said.

Ubuntu Server gets mixed reviews for ease of use in other categories.

Sometimes the need for manual system configuration outweigh the cost savings of using a Linux server, some IT pros say. You’ve got to know Linux pretty well to get the most out of Ubuntu.

Read has encountered problems with dependencies: “The largest issue I had was when I had to install an application from source to make sure I had all the dependencies that were needed to compile the source effectively.”

Linux-savvy admins can get around such problems, Read added. He recommends source applications on Ubuntu over graphical user interface-based ones.  Though they take a long time to mount, source applications allow for more administrator control.

Some users have found Active Directory particularly easy to integrate with Ubuntu, but some have encountered problems. Those in the latter category  say that previous releases of Ubuntu haven’t been easy to use with Microsoft Active Directory, particularly in authentication. They think the new Hardy Heron release should solve that.

On the positive side, Dan Smart, an IT admin at a Fortune 500 mining company, reported, “The new Active Directory integration is excellent. The application they use, Likewise Open, is so much easier than using the PAM Kerberos method or PAM WinBind method of authentication. Works seamlessly.”  

McKeand also found that integration of Ubuntu and Active Directory was fairly straightforward and “has surely been easier year on year.”

Even Windows-friendly administrators have turned to Ubuntu. Ubuntu’s performance marks are very strong, said several of our respondents who have benchmarked it themselves against Windows servers. Some also said that their shops that run mostly Windows servers use Ubuntu for applications Windows does not support.

When compared with Windows, Ubuntu’s support and product pricing has attracted corporate IT managers.  Jim Mirick of Automated Member Services Inc., said: “Our business would be quite different without Ubuntu, because we would have had to spend a lot of time and energy trying to mash more stuff onto one Windows box [due to budget limitations].”

Ubuntu Server has served some companies so well that they don’t want their competitors to know they use it.  “We do both Linux and Windows, [as] I didn’t want to limit my opportunities,” explained an IT pro and respondent, who wished to remain anonymous. He stopped publicizing his decision to use Ubuntu as a core server technology because “I felt this was a competitive advantage.”

If you don’t have to keep your Ubuntu Server a secret, then write to us. Chime in with your Ubuntu Server stories in the comments section below or by emailing me at chunter@techtarget.com.


Feb 4 2008   1:33PM GMT

BackupPC 3.1.0 for Ubuntu



Posted by: Schley Andrew Kutz
Backup & recovery, Ubuntu Linux, Andrew Kutz

While the latest version of BackupPC is 3.1.0, the latest available version in the Ubuntu repositories is 3.0.0. Normally, I wouldn’t split hairs over a point release, but 3.1.0 has some very nice, new features of which IT administrators may want to take advantage.

The problem with downloading the 3.1.0 source and manually installing it is that the source doesn’t install cleanly over the Ubuntu version and ends up breaking BackupPC. Luckily, the Debian repositories already have an unofficial 3.1.0 package in them; however, the Debian version depends on some packages not present in the Ubuntu repositories, such as www-common. So you may want to extract the contents of the Debian BackupPC 3.1.0 package and repackage them for Ubuntu, without the dependencies that Ubuntu does not have.

You can download BackupPC 3.1.0 for Ubuntu at my website.


Nov 9 2007   9:52AM GMT

UPDATE REMINDER: Product of the Year nominations are going on now!



Posted by: admin
disaster recovery, Database, authentication, blades, identity management, Backup & recovery, Enterprise applications for Linux, Xen, Red Hat, green computing, Systems Management, Linux basics, SUSE/Novell, Hardware issues, Clusters, grids and mainframes, Open source applications, Administration, interoperability and integration

2007 Product of the Year AwardsWorking with vendors is tough. You need their help, they want your money. Hopefully, whatever it is they help you install works and the price meets you both somewhere in the middle (as in your side of the middle, right?).

Sometimes this process is a headache, but sometimes a project can really surprise you—things just work and upper management is just peachy keen with how the whole thing looks on the balance sheet.

In that vein, SearchEnterpriseLinux.com wants to help its readers discover the best of the best in Linux products for the enterprise in our prestigious SearchEnterpriseLinux.com 2007 Products of the Year awards. We’ve been asking readers and vendors over at SearchEnterpriseLinux.com to nominate a favorite product they’ve used or to nominate their own new product, and now we’ve opened it up to the Intertubes here at the Enterprise Linux Log. Regardless of where you fall — vendor, user or general Linux guru –the deadline is drawing near!

Our editorial team and a select panel of industry experts and analysts are currently accepting submissions online until 5 p.m. PST on Nov. 9, 2007 in a range of categories, including: Server Linux platform product (either a distribution release or a new, integrated server Linux offering); Security applications/tools for Linux on the server; Virtualization product for Linux on the server; and Linux administration tools. You can access the 2007 POY submission page in the link above.

To qualify, new or significantly upgraded products must have been shipped after October 31, 2006, and before November 1, 2007. Submit your entry today and let us know what you think are the top data center products on the market!


Oct 2 2007   12:59PM GMT

Linux Done Right (personals edition): Linux shop seeks Linux vendor



Posted by: admin
disaster recovery, Backup & recovery, Hardware issues, Linux Done Right, Administration, interoperability and integration

Consider this the second in an occasional, meandering series of articles on Linux done right. These aren’t meant to boost the sales of any particular vendor, but instead are meant to show other end users, IT managers and decision makers what to look for when vetting applications and operating system migrations. It can be support, migrations strategies, execution or anything and everything in between. If it’s Linux done right, then you’ll find it here.


Matthew Porter, the CEO of Contegix, is an anomaly as far as I’m concerned–and I don’t mean that in a negative way whatsoever.You see, Contegix, a managed hosting provider based in St. Louis, Mo., is a 100% Linux shop. Every server they run internally has Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3, 4 or 5 installed (although they’re not using Xen just yet), and all their applications, save a financial/payroll application that just has to run on Windows as a virtual instance in VMware, runs on Linux.OK, so that makes them a 99% Linux shop with a vestigial Microsoft Windows appendix, and I apologize. In an industry that holds sacred the “five nine’s,” I think you can give me some slack on this one.

Anyway, outside of European universities and some HPC instances, 100% Linux shops are a rare breed in this heterogeneous operating system mishmash of a world we live in today. But that still hasn’t stopped Contegix. In a call last week, Porter told me that business is going well and growing fast. So fast, in fact, that Porter called what’s happened over the past few months “explosive.””We’ve grown 10% every month over the past couple of years,” he said. “Today it’s more like 14%.”

I called Contegix an anomaly, but their story isn’t all the surprising when you look at Linux growth over the same period of time. Everyone from Gartner to IDC to our friends at Saugatuck have pegged 2009-2011 or thereabouts as the magic year where Linux takes an approximate 50% share of all mission critical operations in the enterprise. That’s not edge of enterprise stuff in addition to mission critical, either–it’s bare bones “if this messes up then our business suffers” stuff.

But that’s all in the amorphous soup of the far future. Contegix was an all Linux shop now, and with all of that growth over the past few quarters, it was starting to experience what can only be described as growing pains. Legacy software and a surging pile of user data that grew every month were taxing the system and tying up resources for days at a time, Porter said.

Their old backup solution, Arkeia, worked well for about a year, Porter said, but couldn’t scale and Contegix was spending 40+ hours per week managing backups and recoveries.

“The problem we were dealing with was that we were working around the limitations of our previous software,” Porter said. “It often took 24 hours to backup the index that the software was using.” Sometimes that 24-hour estimate was being generous, and the backup took longer (some recovery or file system-related efforts were eating up 42 or more hours a clip). “When a customer needed some stored, even if it was just a 65 meg file or a database or whatever, it may have taken and hour just to restore that. And we were storing about 50 terabytes a month,” he said.

As Contegix continued to grow, speeding up the backup and recovery time would become a top priority going forward.

Looking for options, thinking of Linux

A Linux shop should expect a certain degree of Linux respect and understanding, right? Contegix’s case was no exception. From the onset, Porter and his team sought out vendors who could provide recovery and back up peace of mind with a Linux twist, no questions asked. They had to, because Porter wasn’t about to spend even more money to retrain his staff on Windows or SQL Server.

“We have a lot of Postgres and MySQL, so it was critical to have hot backup plug-ins for those databases … [and] we had literally no technical staff that used Windows as a desktop. We didn’t want to learn SQL Server,” he said.

Those strict specifications hurt the first candidate, Oceanport, N.J.-based CommVault, right out of the gate. With CommVault’s offering, called Simpana, Porter said his staff was asked to learn SQL Server. “Given the ownership costs, CommVault had higher costs of ownership,” Porter said.

Nor did CommVault offer support for MySQL or PostgreSQL. Contegix was also unable to test the application because CommVault wanted a signed PO first. No deal.

The next solution came from Symantec, which Porter and some of the Contegix team had had some experience with at a previous company. From what Porter told me, things didn’t go well even with the prior encounter serving as a foot in the door. Again, the hangup arrived because of how Contegix viewed the vendor’s approach to Linux, Linux support and testing.

“[Symantec weren't as nimble in evaluation process as they could have been. It took two months to get a quote, but there was still no demo unit. The installation process was too costly. The there was the Linux dynamic. The reseller we went through basically said 'we only sell for Windows, but we can do Linux after we get approval for Linux.'," Porter said. "It kind of felt like they fully supported [Linux], but not fully at all.”

Symantec’s application, NetBackup, was also out of Contegix’s price range, and they were worried about the potential management hours they would have to spend on NetBackup.

Cue the Price is Right “you lose” gong sound.

Finding some Linux spine

Rounding out a trio of back up and recovery options was BakBone Software, a backup and recovery vendor based in San Diego. Interestingly enough, the trait that immediately stuck out in Porter’s mind about his experiences with BakBone wasn’t technical, it was support and sales-related.

“The same sales rep we dealt with in the beginning was there a year later. Sometimes when you see a lot of turnover the reps don’t really believe in the product, or it’s not selling, but that obviously wasn’t the case,” he said.

The came the point on which many Linux and open source software relationships are made or broken: support. How does it fare? Is it what you’ve become accustomed to over the years? Is it better? Is it completely different? Is it professional?

In Porter’s case, he asks similar questions, but he also has a test of his own that’s been generated from Contegix’s own support practices. “[As a managed hosting provider] we always have support staff on hand at all times 24/7/365, and we answer every ticket in five minutes. We assign an engineer to that ticket, not some sales rep or whatever. When an organization like ours is built around support as the number one feature, then vendors must have that same mentality,” he said.

Long story short, BakBone did support MySQL and Postgres, and the handful of other applications on hand like Ruby on Rails and Java, and it allowed testing and the price point was right, so Porter bought into NetVault: Backup 8.0.

The server implementation took less than a day, and today Contegix has migrated about 98% of its Arkeia servers over to NetVault. In twenty more days, Porter expects the migration to be complete.

“The consolidation was was a huge benefit for us. They can do full consolidation or a synthetic one. The second big draw for us is the not just the consolidation is that there, it is the fact that we have great independent restore time, that’s fast and a great way to back up our catalogue and index,” Porter said. “We do a lot of back up to a fiber channel SAN. With NetVault, we could mount our SAN in drivesafe just like Oracle does, so that the load can be shared among back end servers and multiple backups and clients. Literally, we have three or four servers that just perform backup.”

For Contegix, the ability to share media and have those multiple backup servers is “ubelieveably smart,” Porter said. “We were spending so much time writing custom scripts to work with the ODL system before and many of those were already features in BakBone,” Porter said.

Indeed, before the third party backup and recovery app was introduced to the Contegix back end environment, the IT staff was wasting a good 100-150 hours per month on those customer scripts. But not anymore.

Like I wrote earlier, the migration off legacy is about 98% done. Something could still go wrong, I suppose, but that’s not the feeling I got when talking with Porter. From the sounds of things this shop will remain a Linux-only club for the indefinite future.


Have a Linux Done Right success story you’d like to share? Send it to me at Jack Loftus, News Writer and I guarantee I’ll get you the 15 minutes of IT fame you so richly deserve.