 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linux fragmentation OK for users, not for businesses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/linux-fragmentation-ok-for-users-not-for-businesses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/linux-fragmentation-ok-for-users-not-for-businesses/</link>
	<description>A SearchEnterpriseLinux.com blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 02:36:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/linux-fragmentation-ok-for-users-not-for-businesses/#comment-1412</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 01:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/linux-fragmentation-ok-for-users-not-for-businesses/#comment-1412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too many COMMERCIAL Linux distros?

There are only TWO - Red Hat (which essentially includes Centos) and Suse. Ubuntu is an also-ran that has a long way to go. Mandriva is a third possible since they actually have a server program with support, but they are still FAR behind Red Hat and Suse.

Everything else is either a community distro or a &quot;one-man band&quot; and is irrelevant to business.

A COMMERCIAL Linux distro offers paid support AND offers a kernel and software optimized for server use. That is the ONLY distinction between distros which is of significance to business.

Driver vendors? These clowns aren&#039;t going to support Linux until the big retailers like Dell and HP and Lenovo force them to. And that won&#039;t happen until corporations wake up and try to get out from under Microsoft&#039;s problems and then start demanding their hardware vendors support Linux.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too many COMMERCIAL Linux distros?</p>
<p>There are only TWO &#8211; Red Hat (which essentially includes Centos) and Suse. Ubuntu is an also-ran that has a long way to go. Mandriva is a third possible since they actually have a server program with support, but they are still FAR behind Red Hat and Suse.</p>
<p>Everything else is either a community distro or a &#8220;one-man band&#8221; and is irrelevant to business.</p>
<p>A COMMERCIAL Linux distro offers paid support AND offers a kernel and software optimized for server use. That is the ONLY distinction between distros which is of significance to business.</p>
<p>Driver vendors? These clowns aren&#8217;t going to support Linux until the big retailers like Dell and HP and Lenovo force them to. And that won&#8217;t happen until corporations wake up and try to get out from under Microsoft&#8217;s problems and then start demanding their hardware vendors support Linux.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
