<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does anyone care about the MS-Novell agreement besides, well, MS and Novell?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/does-anyone-care-about-the-ms-novell-agreement-besides-well-ms-and-novell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/does-anyone-care-about-the-ms-novell-agreement-besides-well-ms-and-novell/</link>
	<description>A SearchEnterpriseLinux.com blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Boycott Novell &#187; One-Year Anniversary &#8216;Celebrations&#8217; &#8212; Bruce Perens on the Novell/Microsoft Deal</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/does-anyone-care-about-the-ms-novell-agreement-besides-well-ms-and-novell/#comment-1000</link>
		<dc:creator>Boycott Novell &#187; One-Year Anniversary &#8216;Celebrations&#8217; &#8212; Bruce Perens on the Novell/Microsoft Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 08:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/does-anyone-care-about-the-ms-novell-agreement-besides-well-ms-and-novell/#comment-1000</guid>
		<description>[...] Does anyone care about the MS-Novell agreement besides, well, MS and Novell?  I realize it’s only one year in, but I think it would behoove Microsoft and Novell to flesh out what it is they mean when they talk about “interoperability frameworks” and the like. Revenue numbers from Novell for its OS business wouldn’t hurt, either. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Does anyone care about the MS-Novell agreement besides, well, MS and Novell?  I realize it’s only one year in, but I think it would behoove Microsoft and Novell to flesh out what it is they mean when they talk about “interoperability frameworks” and the like. Revenue numbers from Novell for its OS business wouldn’t hurt, either. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does Ubuntu&#8217;s documentation stink? &#8212; Enterprise Linux Log</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/does-anyone-care-about-the-ms-novell-agreement-besides-well-ms-and-novell/#comment-997</link>
		<dc:creator>Does Ubuntu&#8217;s documentation stink? &#8212; Enterprise Linux Log</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/does-anyone-care-about-the-ms-novell-agreement-besides-well-ms-and-novell/#comment-997</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s a day of blog subject line questions, apparently. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s a day of blog subject line questions, apparently. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->