<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apt-file: Providing apt&#8217;s answer to rpm -qf</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/apt-file-providing-apts-answer-to-rpm-qf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/apt-file-providing-apts-answer-to-rpm-qf/</link>
	<description>A SearchEnterpriseLinux.com blog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: apt</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/apt-file-providing-apts-answer-to-rpm-qf/#comment-1290</link>
		<dc:creator>apt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/apt-file-providing-apts-answer-to-rpm-qf/#comment-1290</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Apt-file: Providing apt’s answer to rpm -qf&lt;/strong&gt;

Bookmarked your post over at Blog Bookmarker.com!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&lt;strong&gt;Apt-file: Providing apt’s answer to rpm -qf&lt;/strong&gt;</p>
<p>Bookmarked your post over at Blog&nbsp;&lt;a href="http://Bookmarker.com" title="http://Bookmarker. " target="_blank"&gt;Bookmarker.com&lt;/a&gt;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schley Andrew Kutz</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/apt-file-providing-apts-answer-to-rpm-qf/#comment-1289</link>
		<dc:creator>Schley Andrew Kutz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/apt-file-providing-apts-answer-to-rpm-qf/#comment-1289</guid>
		<description>I completely agree. I should have pointed out that the apt packages are just wrappers from the dpkg commands. I chose to focus on the apt packages for two reasons:

- They are what Canonical are standardizing on for package management and IT administrators are likely to find the most help WRT package management if they ask about the apt tools.

- The dpkg tools themselves are many. If there was just one dpkg command that did it all I would focus on that, but dpkg is really a suite of tools as well. 

Thank you again for your point, it just reinforces the fact that there is always more than one way to skin a doorknob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree. I should have pointed out that the apt packages are just wrappers from the dpkg commands. I chose to focus on the apt packages for two reasons:</p>
<p>- They are what Canonical are standardizing on for package management and IT administrators are likely to find the most help WRT package management if they ask about the apt tools.</p>
<p>- The dpkg tools themselves are many. If there was just one dpkg command that did it all I would focus on that, but dpkg is really a suite of tools as well. </p>
<p>Thank you again for your point, it just reinforces the fact that there is always more than one way to skin a doorknob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valdemar Lemche</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/apt-file-providing-apts-answer-to-rpm-qf/#comment-1288</link>
		<dc:creator>Valdemar Lemche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/apt-file-providing-apts-answer-to-rpm-qf/#comment-1288</guid>
		<description>Gr8 the point got stripped in the post ... :&#124;

What was meant to be written was:

Erhm … ok apt-file is cool, but debian/ubuntu’s real equivalent to “rpm -qf “ is “dpkg -S“, which as has been in standard switch in any debian variant since … well forever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gr8 the point got stripped in the post &#8230; <img src='http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_neutral.gif' alt=':|' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
What was meant to be written was:</p>
<p>Erhm … ok apt-file is cool, but debian/ubuntu’s real equivalent to “rpm -qf “ is “dpkg -S“, which as has been in standard switch in any debian variant since … well forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valdemar Lemche</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/apt-file-providing-apts-answer-to-rpm-qf/#comment-1287</link>
		<dc:creator>Valdemar Lemche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-linux/apt-file-providing-apts-answer-to-rpm-qf/#comment-1287</guid>
		<description>Erhm ... ok apt-file is cool, but debian/ubuntu's real equivalent to "rpm -qf ", which as has been in standard switch in any debian variant since ... well forever.

Please remember that apt-get apt-file and all the other 'apt' associated programs are just wrapper programs around some package management program. For instance when I used redhat, (many years ago), I would always install apt-get as standard component to handle my RPM package management. (I can't live without apt ...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erhm &#8230; ok apt-file is cool, but debian/ubuntu&#8217;s real equivalent to &#8220;rpm -qf &#8220;, which as has been in standard switch in any debian variant since &#8230; well forever.</p>
<p>Please remember that apt-get apt-file and all the other &#8216;apt&#8217; associated programs are just wrapper programs around some package management program. For instance when I used redhat, (many years ago), I would always install apt-get as standard component to handle my RPM package management. (I can&#8217;t live without apt &#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->