EAI and SOA challenges

Jun 8 2008   4:23AM GMT

Will ESB and BPMS from different vendors work well together?



Posted by: Roger Pedroso
Standards, SOA, ESB, BPMS

Last week I was talking with a colleague about ESB and BPMS. Vendors are offering BPMS with ESB features, but the company where he works will evaluate BPMS and ESB separately.

I think it is hard to define where ESB’s responsability ends and BPMS’s responsability begins. Besides, what kind of requirement will guarantee that ESB and BPMS from different vendors work well together?

Standards could be used for ensure the interoperability of ESB with BPMS. But how to be sure the vendors really follow the standards? For example, if a requirement states that the ESB registry must be compliant with the UDDI Version 3 standard and another says BPMS must be able to discover services at an UDDI Version 3, when ESB and BPMS are from different vendors do you really believe they will always be compatible?

Choosing BPMS and ESB separately can bring the best of two worlds, but you must be careful to avoid a gap between the platforms.

Comment on this Post


You must be logged-in to post a comment. Log-in/Register

Jcrow  |   Jun 9 2008   5:13PM GMT

Roger,

I have heard this argument increasingly over the last few weeks/months - so much so that we decided to devote a panel to it at our upcoming user conference. Tom Debevoise is moderating a session titled BPM, SOA, ESB (technology/management): Who’s Driving?. I expect the issue to be a hot one in the coming year, and one that we as BPM vendors will need to address head on.

For those that can’t attend we also have a forum thread dedicated to discussing this session. We would love to hear your feedback and thoughts.

Jonathan