<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Measuring data center performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/data-center-facilities/measuring-data-center-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/data-center-facilities/measuring-data-center-performance/</link>
	<description>A SearchDataCenter.com blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jpouchet</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/data-center-facilities/measuring-data-center-performance/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Jpouchet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1254673023#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Mark,

Very glad to see you pick up this important issue of defining useful work/productivity in the data center. At [A href="http://www.emerson.com/en-US/about_emerson/emerson_business/Pages/Network_Power.aspx"]Emerson Network Power [/A]we feel that the [A href="http://www.thegreengrid.org"]Green Grid[/A] has taken a bold step forward in offering these proxies to the industry for further evaluation. We strongly encourage those interested to download the white paper, [A href="http://www.thegreengrid.org/en/sitecore/content/Global/Content/white-papers/Proxy-Proposals-for-Measuring-Data-Center-Efficiency.aspx"]Proxy Proposals for Measuring Data Center Efficiency[/A], and provide feedback and recommendations to the Green Grid via the on-line survey tool. It is now time for all of us with an interest in developing a meaningful metric to report data center productivity to become fully engaged and constructively speak our mind on their relative merits.

One observation to note: all of the proxies will favor newer servers as this is just the inherent nature of our business. Newer devices are more [A href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Productivity"]productive [/A]in not only total capacity but also capacity per watt. This gives further credence to your observation on PUE not being relevant as a data center with a PUE of 1.2 comprised of servers three to five years old will never match a data center with a PUE of 2 and all new servers from a productivity standpoint. And productivity is what moves business. One can see the impact of this in the complete [A href="http://www.emerson.com/edc/docs/EnergyLogicMetricPaper.pdf"]CUPS proxy white paper[/A]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>Very glad to see you pick up this important issue of defining useful work/productivity in the data center. At <a href="http://www.emerson.com/en-US/about_emerson/emerson_business/Pages/Network_Power.aspx">Emerson Network Power </a>we feel that the <a href="http://www.thegreengrid.org">Green Grid</a> has taken a bold step forward in offering these proxies to the industry for further evaluation. We strongly encourage those interested to download the white paper, <a href="http://www.thegreengrid.org/en/sitecore/content/Global/Content/white-papers/Proxy-Proposals-for-Measuring-Data-Center-Efficiency.aspx">Proxy Proposals for Measuring Data Center Efficiency</a>, and provide feedback and recommendations to the Green Grid via the on-line survey tool. It is now time for all of us with an interest in developing a meaningful metric to report data center productivity to become fully engaged and constructively speak our mind on their relative merits.</p>
<p>One observation to note: all of the proxies will favor newer servers as this is just the inherent nature of our business. Newer devices are more <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Productivity">productive </a>in not only total capacity but also capacity per watt. This gives further credence to your observation on PUE not being relevant as a data center with a PUE of 1.2 comprised of servers three to five years old will never match a data center with a PUE of 2 and all new servers from a productivity standpoint. And productivity is what moves business. One can see the impact of this in the complete <a href="http://www.emerson.com/edc/docs/EnergyLogicMetricPaper.pdf">CUPS proxy white paper</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jpouchet</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/data-center-facilities/measuring-data-center-performance/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Jpouchet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1254673023#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Very glad to see you pick up this important issue of defining useful work/productivity in the data center. At [A href="http://www.emerson.com/en-US/about_emerson/emerson_business/Pages/Network_Power.aspx"]Emerson Network Power[/A] we feel that the [A href="http://www.thegreengrid.org"]Green Grid[/A] has taken a bold step forward in offering these proxies to the industry for further evaluation. We strongly encourage those interested to download the white paper, [A href="http://www.thegreengrid.org/en/sitecore/content/Global/Content/white-papers/Proxy-Proposals-for-Measuring-Data-Center-Efficiency.aspx"]Proxy Proposals for Measuring Data Center Efficiency[/A], and provide feedback and recommendations to the Green Grid via the on-line survey tool. It is now time for all of us with an interest in developing a meaningful metric to report data center productivity to become fully engaged and constructively speak our mind on their relative merits.

One observation to note: all of the proxies will favor newer servers as this is just the inherent nature of our business. Newer devices are more [A href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Productivity"]productive[/A] in not only total capacity but also capacity per watt. This gives further credence to your observation on PUE not being relevant as a data center with a PUE of 1.2 comprised of servers three to five years old will never match a data center with a PUE of 2 and all new servers from a productivity standpoint. And productivity is what moves business. One can see the impact of this in the complete [A href="http://www.emerson.com/edc/docs/EnergyLogicMetricPaper.pdf"]CUPS proxy white paper[/A].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very glad to see you pick up this important issue of defining useful work/productivity in the data center. At <a href="http://www.emerson.com/en-US/about_emerson/emerson_business/Pages/Network_Power.aspx">Emerson Network Power</a> we feel that the <a href="http://www.thegreengrid.org">Green Grid</a> has taken a bold step forward in offering these proxies to the industry for further evaluation. We strongly encourage those interested to download the white paper, <a href="http://www.thegreengrid.org/en/sitecore/content/Global/Content/white-papers/Proxy-Proposals-for-Measuring-Data-Center-Efficiency.aspx">Proxy Proposals for Measuring Data Center Efficiency</a>, and provide feedback and recommendations to the Green Grid via the on-line survey tool. It is now time for all of us with an interest in developing a meaningful metric to report data center productivity to become fully engaged and constructively speak our mind on their relative merits.</p>
<p>One observation to note: all of the proxies will favor newer servers as this is just the inherent nature of our business. Newer devices are more <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Productivity">productive</a> in not only total capacity but also capacity per watt. This gives further credence to your observation on PUE not being relevant as a data center with a PUE of 1.2 comprised of servers three to five years old will never match a data center with a PUE of 2 and all new servers from a productivity standpoint. And productivity is what moves business. One can see the impact of this in the complete <a href="http://www.emerson.com/edc/docs/EnergyLogicMetricPaper.pdf">CUPS proxy white paper</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->