Adventures in Data Center Automation

Mar 5 2008   7:59PM GMT

Top Enterprise Management Tools vs. Data Center Automation Blueprint



Posted by: Ryan Shopp
DataCenter, Analytics, Application monitoring, CMDB, DCAB, HP Software, IBM Tivoli, InfoVista, IT Process Automation, Netuitive, RBA, RealOps, Run Book Automation, Systems monitoring, BMC, Network configuration, Network monitoring, Networkingchannel, Performance management, CA, NetQoS, Opnet, Tideway

I was doing some “light” reading this morning and came upon this recent article:  Top 10 Enterprise Management Tools

It’s focused on Complete Enterprise Management, not specifically focused on the Data Center so I thought I would summarize and then compare/contrast/discuss:

  • Network Fault & Performance: CA eHealth & Spectrum
  • Consolidated Event Management: IBM Tivoli Netcool
  • Service Impact Monitoring : IBM Tivoli Business Service Manage & Service Level Advisor
  • Application Discovery Mapping: Tideway Foundation
  • Business Intelligence: Cognos
  • ITSM Workflow, CMDB and Service Desk: BMC Remedy ITSM and Atrium
  • Network & Systems Configuration Managment: HP Automation (formerly Opsware SAS & NAS)
  • Process Automation: BMC RunBook Automation

Since it isn’t data center centric, it’s light on automated management for applications & databases.  It also chooses to stay away from the very congested and sometimes confusing security/protection market.

Next up, I thought  it would be fun to do a quick mapping to the Data Center Automation Blueprint.

  • Network Fault & Performance, Consolidated Event Management, Service Impact Monitoring = Availability & Performance
  • Application Discovery Mapping, CMDB = IT Resource Reconciliation
  • Business Intelligence = Analytics (maybe…Analytics is still a work in progress…need to figure out this vs. BSM etc)
  • ITSM Workflow, Service Desk = outside of DCAB listed as Manual Task Orchestration

I was surprised not to see an End-User Application Performance Monitoring category.  These products either do their duty from passive agents on the endpoint or from data center appliances using slick algorithms, TCPIP theory, etc.  Maybe that could have indirectly been rolled under Network Fault & Performance as CA acquired Wily which offers that.  The other one missing was more towards Capacity Planning and Trending Analytics, either based off historical data like what Opnet offers or from real-time data patterns from Netuitive.

Needless to say I found it a really nice write-up and summary of those products/offerings.  The only thing I struggle with is all of the big 4 (BMC, CA, HP, IBM) are represented in this mix.  Which means you will have 4 sales guys all continously battling it out to grab more land.  This may be good from a cost competition standpoint, but it’s a real fiasco for making sure all parts are playing nicely with each other or simply managing those vendor relationships.  Bottom line, you’re always going to have at least one of the big 4 in there as they continue to snap-up the innovative smaller companies/ technologies to enhance their portfolio and offer differentiation.  So I’d typically recommend a strategy where you pick 2 of the big 4 and keep them in check versus each other while continually looking for those innovative start-up’s to fill in the gaps.  Here is an example of how you could do this using the categories in the original article.

  • Network Fault & Performance: HP Network Node Manager, Operations Manager, Performance Insight
  • Consolidated Event Management: IBM Tivoli Netcool
  • Service Impact Monitoring : IBM Tivoli Business Service Manage & Service Level Adviser
  • Application Discovery Mapping: IBM Tivoli Application Dependency Discovery Manager
  • Business Intelligence: Cognos (which IBM recently acquired)
  • ITSM Workflow, CMDB and Service Desk: HP AssetCenter (former Peregrine)
  • Network & Systems Configuration Managment: HP Data Center Automation (formerly Opsware SAS & NAS)
  • Process Automation: HP Operations Orchestration (formerly iConclude that Opsware acquired)

Or, if you want to completely rebel and go the non-big 4 route, take a look at the above mappings to the DCAB and look for a name that’s not big-4.  Example:  Network Fault & Performance: InfoVista or NetQoS

Comment on this Post


You must be logged-in to post a comment. Log-in/Register

Shenning  |   Mar 18 2008   11:07PM GMT

Pretty direct mapping between the Blueprint and that article’s focus areas, Ryan. You point out a big hole in their focus categories ignoring real-time and offline analytics solutions. There is a huge amount of automation to be gained in the area of performance and availability management, traditionally a labor intensive endeavor. The market seems to be catching on and I’m sure the Big 4 are looking at extending their portfolios in this area. Right now, it is really only innovative startups that are providing these capabilities.