<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 2008-05-13</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/data-center-automation/links-for-2008-05-13/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/data-center-automation/links-for-2008-05-13/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 05:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frank@MO</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/data-center-automation/links-for-2008-05-13/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank@MO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 20:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/data-center-automation/links-for-2008-05-13/#comment-138</guid>
		<description>Interestingly enough, the InformationWeek article argues the challenge with implementing BSM is the absence of process, yet it also seems to advocate one solution is a Service Catalog, which sounds an awful lot like another tool.  Here’s a few ideas on [A href="http://www.wearebsm.com/managed_objects/2008/05/does-process-matter.html"]BSM process[/A].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly enough, the InformationWeek article argues the challenge with implementing BSM is the absence of process, yet it also seems to advocate one solution is a Service Catalog, which sounds an awful lot like another tool.  Here’s a few ideas on <a href="http://www.wearebsm.com/managed_objects/2008/05/does-process-matter.html">BSM process</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->