<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Constitutes Good Program Code?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/customapps/what-constitutes-good-program-code/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/customapps/what-constitutes-good-program-code/</link>
	<description>Buy, Build or Ignore?</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: LadyRatri</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/customapps/what-constitutes-good-program-code/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>LadyRatri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/customapps/what-constitutes-good-program-code/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Your statement about programmers who obsess over "complexifying" code from 20 lines down to 5 reminds me of a comment I have heard regarding "good" code: "Be smart -- not clever." It's a concise way to differentiate between the modularizations and reuse you talk about, and the over-optimization. Smart is clear and useful. Clever is very hard to follow -- not only reading it six months later, but for someone other than the original developer trying to understand what's going on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your statement about programmers who obsess over &#8220;complexifying&#8221; code from 20 lines down to 5 reminds me of a comment I have heard regarding &#8220;good&#8221; code: &#8220;Be smart &#8212; not clever.&#8221; It&#8217;s a concise way to differentiate between the modularizations and reuse you talk about, and the over-optimization. Smart is clear and useful. Clever is very hard to follow &#8212; not only reading it six months later, but for someone other than the original developer trying to understand what&#8217;s going on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->