Nov 11 2008 9:24PM GMT
Posted by: Joe Coley
Vista,
Vista Update Problem
I’ll try hard to not have this post be a rant! It’ll take everything in my power, however
— since I just can’t understand why such an operation like Microsoft, who, with all their resources can’t seem to get things right the first time, second time, or even later than that!
I’m very clear about the times that my applications fail to meet expectations - those are times generally when I’ve been told to just get something going — and I’ve yielded to putting something up with “minimal” testing. Heck, just last week I had a customer say to me “Testing, that shouldn’t take long! I guess you can have it ready tomorrow - right?” As a customer with no technical background this customer didn’t understand that the change being requested, a simple field addition, would affect some 75% of the screens of the program, about 90% of the reports, and other such “details”.
Testing does take time — variations of environments are difficult to identify and test for it is true. However, I have a problem with issues that are fixed only to return later - whether it be Microsoft or myself I have a problem with it. My Vista laptop running Vista Ultimate (…the best Vista right? Ultimate? Must be the best! — NOT!). I’ve had the dreaded “Configuring updates: stage 3 of 3 - 0% complete” infinite loop problem return after months of apparently successful updates. It’s about as ugly a problem as it gets, but the good news (…if one can call it that) is that the system generally can be recovered. Just follow this link to Microsoft for a solution should you be so unfortunate as to experience this.
Sep 25 2008 3:31PM GMT
Posted by: Joe Coley
Software testing,
Software maintenance,
Custom software development,
Failed software updates,
Vista Update Problem
Don’t you hate it when an update fails? I had the experience just yesterday while doing an update on my Microsoft Vista laptop. The updates appeared to be going correctly, but at the very end I found myself in an endless loop situation. The situation was not pretty and upon further investigation in the web a Google search pointed me in the direction of a workaround. I wasn’t sure that was the right direction, but this was not something that was unique to myself. The work-around worked!
I was fortunate. I only lost about an hour in my struggle to find the answer to take corrective action. However, others were not so lucky, many losing countless hours before recovering — or not — their system. My investigation to this point indicates that while this has happened on an occasional basis for some, Microsoft has been apparently quiet regarding this problem. This was an update that I expected to work absolutely perfectly since a fellow developer friend of mine said he never liked Vista until he had installed service pack one.
It seems that on August 12 of this year VMare issued an update which caused issues regarding the licensing. The problem prompted an open letter to VMware customers from VMware’s president (…see letter). This appears to be a fine example of software quality assurance going wrong — just how this embarrassing situation occurred is certainly under investigation by VMware.
As I see it, these two examples of updates that failed are very different. In the case of the VMware issue a fix was readily found, as the issue was the result of a programming error. A quick fix of the error and the problem was resolved.
As for the Microsoft issue. I see the problem as somewhat different in that while the problem has occurred for some, there are many for whom it has not occurred. This represents a much more difficult issue to resolve. As a result of the very nature of personal PCs, testing for this error becomes much more of an issue. I can almost forgive Microsoft for not having a solution to it.
Yes, I’ve had perhaps more than my share of failed updates. I find that I am much more upset with programming or testing errors than with errors which occur as the result of network or hardware issues which I cannot duplicate. Regardless of the cause, there is no such thing as a good failed update.