<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Changes, Users and Resistance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/customapps/changes-users-and-resistance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/customapps/changes-users-and-resistance/</link>
	<description>Buy, Build or Ignore?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: GarretMott</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/customapps/changes-users-and-resistance/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>GarretMott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/customapps/?p=225#comment-74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Joe -

I too liked Avery&#039;s quote from the book.  How true it is!

However, the move from NG to web forum at Data Access is (to me) a different situation.  I won&#039;t get into a rant about people making things look spiffy while removing/obfuscating utility, but there are a few points I would like to mention.

The forum will increase the presence of VDF &amp; DAW on the web.  That&#039;s good.

What isn&#039;t so good is that 1) using the web forums is far more cumbersome than the NG for the people who want to answer a question &amp; 2) there is software available for synching the forum &amp; a NG.

The software is even free!  It (I believe) works off SQL triggers to keep the 2 tables synched instantaneously.

Forums seem to be designed from the point of view of someone asking a question, not the people who may answer - whereas NG&#039;s make it easy to browse through the questions &amp; answer some.

So - why not have the best of both worlds?  Shouldn&#039;t the mantra of IT/support be &quot;let&#039;s make it work for all users&quot;?  

Get back to work Garret.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Joe -</p>
<p>I too liked Avery&#8217;s quote from the book.  How true it is!</p>
<p>However, the move from NG to web forum at Data Access is (to me) a different situation.  I won&#8217;t get into a rant about people making things look spiffy while removing/obfuscating utility, but there are a few points I would like to mention.</p>
<p>The forum will increase the presence of VDF &amp; DAW on the web.  That&#8217;s good.</p>
<p>What isn&#8217;t so good is that 1) using the web forums is far more cumbersome than the NG for the people who want to answer a question &amp; 2) there is software available for synching the forum &amp; a NG.</p>
<p>The software is even free!  It (I believe) works off SQL triggers to keep the 2 tables synched instantaneously.</p>
<p>Forums seem to be designed from the point of view of someone asking a question, not the people who may answer &#8211; whereas NG&#8217;s make it easy to browse through the questions &amp; answer some.</p>
<p>So &#8211; why not have the best of both worlds?  Shouldn&#8217;t the mantra of IT/support be &#8220;let&#8217;s make it work for all users&#8221;?  </p>
<p>Get back to work Garret&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Coley</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/customapps/changes-users-and-resistance/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Coley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/customapps/?p=225#comment-73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you Avery for this post!  The book, Getting Real is not a book I&#039;m familiar with, at least up to now!  Having taken a look at it with the links you provided I can see that it truly presents much of my &quot;preaching&quot; about what software &quot;should&quot; be!  Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Avery for this post!  The book, Getting Real is not a book I&#8217;m familiar with, at least up to now!  Having taken a look at it with the links you provided I can see that it truly presents much of my &#8220;preaching&#8221; about what software &#8220;should&#8221; be!  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
