 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Unified Communications: Click to talk &#187; vision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/connectivity/tag/vision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/connectivity</link>
	<description>News and information about Unified Communications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 20:31:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Single Point of Contact</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/connectivity/single-point-of-contact/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/connectivity/single-point-of-contact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Bradley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unified Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vision]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/connectivity/single-point-of-contact/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What does the future of Unified Communications hold? I am sure that Microsoft, Cisco, Nortel and other major UC players all have their own visions (weighed heavily with their own UC products and solutions), but Network World&#8217;s Michael Osterman describes his vision of the UC future in this article. I agree with the direction Osterman [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does the future of Unified Communications hold? I am sure that Microsoft, Cisco, Nortel and other major UC players all have their own visions (weighed heavily with their own UC products and solutions), but Network World&#8217;s Michael Osterman describes his vision of the UC future <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/newsletters/gwm/2008/072808msg2.html">in this article</a>. I agree with the direction Osterman describes. I think part of the promise of UC is to have a single point of contact. I can have one handle- a phone number, or an IM handle, or an email address- and regardless of whether someone wants to reach me by phone, email, instant messaging, voicemail, fax, etc.- they will all use the single point of contact rather than having to know or remember an entire list of addresses and phone numbers.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/connectivity/single-point-of-contact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
