 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Unified Communications: Click to talk &#187; Huawei Technologies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/connectivity/tag/huawei-technologies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/connectivity</link>
	<description>News and information about Unified Communications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 20:31:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Purchase of 3Com Stalled, But Not Yet Scuttled</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/connectivity/purchase-of-3com-stalled-but-not-yet-scuttled/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/connectivity/purchase-of-3com-stalled-but-not-yet-scuttled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 04:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Bradley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3Com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huawei Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/connectivity/purchase-of-3com-stalled-but-not-yet-scuttled/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You might remember a couple years ago when President Bush supported a plan to sell management control of our sea ports to Dubai Ports, a United Arab Emirates (UAE) based company. There was significant backlash about the national security concerns of allowing an Arab company to control the U.S. ports and the deal was scrapped. [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might remember a couple years ago when <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11474440/">President Bush supported</a> a plan to sell management control of our sea ports to Dubai Ports, a United Arab Emirates (UAE) based company. There was significant backlash about the national security concerns of allowing an Arab company to control the U.S. ports and the deal was scrapped. Following immediately in the wake of that deal, Israel-based Checkpoint <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/threatchaos/?p=283">scrapped a deal</a> to purchase software developer Sourcefire over concerns that a foreign company would control Snort, a popular open-source intrusion detection system (IDS). The 3Com deal threatens to be the latest deal scuttled over national security concerns. Bain Capital LLC sought to purchase 3Com, but with the Chinese Huawei Technologies capturing a minority stake as well. Congress has reservations about a Chinese company with close ties to the Chinese government having any ownership stake in a company that manufactures equipment used in public and private sector network security. Check out <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;taxonomyName=network_security&amp;articleId=9063558&amp;taxonomyId=142&amp;intsrc=kc_top">National security issues put Bain-Huawei bid for 3Com on hold</a> for more information.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/connectivity/purchase-of-3com-stalled-but-not-yet-scuttled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BT Undertakes Massive Global Network Overhaul</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/connectivity/bt-undertakes-massive-global-network-overhaul/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/connectivity/bt-undertakes-massive-global-network-overhaul/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Bradley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alcatel-Lucent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fujitsu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huawei Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telecommunications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/connectivity/bt-undertakes-massive-global-network-overhaul/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the downsides to being a dominant provider of telecommunications around the world is that it also makes you the owner of legacy telecommunications hardware and networking equipment around the world. Even dominant global providers have to upgrade though. BT has begun a project dubbed 21CN (21st Century Network) estimated at $21 billion and [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the downsides to being a dominant provider of telecommunications around the world is that it also makes you the owner of legacy telecommunications hardware and networking equipment around the world. Even dominant global providers have to upgrade though. BT has begun a project dubbed 21CN (21st Century Network) estimated at $21 billion and projected to be completed in 2009. The focus of the rollout is to upgrade customers from legacy telecommunications networks to a new, all-IP communications network. Alcatel-Lucent is a key supplier, as is Cisco, Fujitsu, and Huawei Technologies. You can <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;taxonomyName=lan_wan&amp;articleId=9026365&amp;taxonomyId=80&amp;intsrc=kc_top">learn more in this article </a>from Computerworld.com.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/connectivity/bt-undertakes-massive-global-network-overhaul/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
