<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Discussion on: Cutting Edge Microsoft UC</title>
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/connectivity/cutting-edge-microsoft-uc/</link>
	<description>News and information about Unified Communications</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 23:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: S3kur3</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/connectivity/cutting-edge-microsoft-uc/#comment-43</link>
		<author>S3kur3</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/connectivity/cutting-edge-microsoft-uc/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Well- as of this past Monday, Bill Gates is out of the picture. BUT- the 'matter of time' has already passed. Microsoft already developed Response Point, an SMB / SOHO- and potentially home- phone system providing VoIP, presence, voicemail on email, and other functionality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well- as of this past Monday, Bill Gates is out of the picture. BUT- the &#8216;matter of time&#8217; has already passed. Microsoft already developed Response Point, an SMB / SOHO- and potentially home- phone system providing VoIP, presence, voicemail on email, and other functionality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhoneTool</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/connectivity/cutting-edge-microsoft-uc/#comment-42</link>
		<author>PhoneTool</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 04:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/connectivity/cutting-edge-microsoft-uc/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>On reading this post I started to reflect on parallels between the history of the PC and developments in the IP PBX world. In the same way as Thomas Watson couldn't imagine a worldwide market for more than a handful of computers, I'm sure many of us struggle to contemplate a VoIP PBX in every home. It now seems to me that the idea is not so absurd (but then I have a teenage daughters). 

Cisco and friends are cleaning up the enterprise &lt;a href="http://www.business-phone-tools.com/voip-phone-systems.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;VoIP phone systems&lt;/a&gt; market while Digium and friends are looking after the SMBs. It's only a matter of time before a Bill Gates look alike emerges with a must-have an IP PBX for every SOHO operator and household. 

In fact I'm quietly confident that MS Office 2010 will include an IP PBX module. As we know, history has a way of repeating itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On reading this post I started to reflect on parallels between the history of the PC and developments in the IP PBX world. In the same way as Thomas Watson couldn&#8217;t imagine a worldwide market for more than a handful of computers, I&#8217;m sure many of us struggle to contemplate a VoIP PBX in every home. It now seems to me that the idea is not so absurd (but then I have a teenage daughters). </p>
<p>Cisco and friends are cleaning up the enterprise &lt;a href="http://www.business-phone-tools.com/voip-phone-systems.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;VoIP phone systems&lt;/a&gt; market while Digium and friends are looking after the SMBs. It&#8217;s only a matter of time before a Bill Gates look alike emerges with a must-have an IP PBX for every SOHO operator and household. </p>
<p>In fact I&#8217;m quietly confident that MS Office 2010 will include an IP PBX module. As we know, history has a way of repeating itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
