section 404

SAS 70 and Regulatory Audits | What is the Impact to our Economy?

The impacts, in my opinion, are the following. Interestingly, the last decade has seen somewhat of a shift in auditing. That’s not to say there has been a decrease in this specialized service, quite to the contrary. The shift has occurred as financial statement auditing has begun to see somewhat of a flat line in growth, while highly specialized audits, such as Statement on Auditing Standards No. 70 (SAS 70) have been given the limelight. Regulatory legislation, such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), the Gramm-Leach Bliley Act (GLBA), and numerous other federal and state laws have pushed audits, such as SAS 70, into the forefront. Additional audit or examination procedures that are non-financial in nature include the Payment Card Industry (PCI) audits, which are undertaken by entities that process credit card transactions, along with numerous ISO quality audits.

From a regulatory compliance perspective, impacts of audits to the economy have resulted in many service organizations having to become SAS 70 Type II compliant. It all starts with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. In simple terms, section 404 states that management must establish effective internal controls as it relates to financial reporting and must also gain assurances from outsourced third-party vendors (i.e., service organizations) whose controls can affect financial reporting. Though it may sound somewhat vague and blurred, it’s really quite straightforward. Take note of the following example to see the effect SAS 70 has on section 404 of publicly traded companies.

Sarbanes Oxley (SOX) and SAS 70 | Understanding the relationship

Many people often ask me what exactly is the relationship between SOX and SAS 70. The relationship between SOX and SAS 70 begins with Section 404. Because management must report annually on it’s effectiveness of internal controls, it then has an obligation to inquire and inspect on all controls considered vital to the organization as a whole, but more importantly, to it’s financial reporting process. Since a large number of publicly traded companies outsource a host of critical services, these outsourcer providers, commonly referred to as “service organizations”, are considered an integral component for purposes of financial reporting. Therefore, a due-diligence process must be enacted to have their internal controls observed and certified. The Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Chief Accountant and the Division of Corporation Finance has stated that “In many situations, a registrant relies on a third party service provider to perform certain functions where the outsourced activity affects the initiation, authorization, recording, processing or reporting of transactions in the registrant’s financial statement. In assessing internal controls over financial reporting, management may rely on a Type 2 SAS 70 report.” So, there you have it. If you want to learn more about SAS 70, visit the most in-depth web site available on Statement on Auditing Standards No. 70, at www.sas70.us.com