<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I saw AT&amp;T&#8217;s cloud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cloud-computing/i-saw-atts-cloud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cloud-computing/i-saw-atts-cloud/</link>
	<description>Meteorology for the cloud computing world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 07:39:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: CarlBrooks</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cloud-computing/i-saw-atts-cloud/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>CarlBrooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1721983592#comment-46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well not just the shiny, although I admit I am a bit of a hardware aficionado, shiny stuff makes me happy. But you&#039;re right, it&#039;s par for the course with any modern datacenter. What stood out to me was the amount of empty space and planned-for capacity. There&#039;s easily 10 years worth of fast,  steady growth in that building.

 What I was trying to bring across, which may have been a little bit lost in the post, is that the big telecom companies are clearly ready for a long term, massive growth in the need for infrastructure, especially infrastructure as a service. 

Amazon is making a lot of hay right now on economies of scale and automated delivery, but it buys data center space from other people (Equinix hosts a great deal of AWS infrastructure on each coast).  AT&amp;T and Verizon are copying that efficient model, and they own their own facilities, cutting out one more middleman. The math seems simple to me, long term.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well not just the shiny, although I admit I am a bit of a hardware aficionado, shiny stuff makes me happy. But you&#8217;re right, it&#8217;s par for the course with any modern datacenter. What stood out to me was the amount of empty space and planned-for capacity. There&#8217;s easily 10 years worth of fast,  steady growth in that building.</p>
<p> What I was trying to bring across, which may have been a little bit lost in the post, is that the big telecom companies are clearly ready for a long term, massive growth in the need for infrastructure, especially infrastructure as a service. </p>
<p>Amazon is making a lot of hay right now on economies of scale and automated delivery, but it buys data center space from other people (Equinix hosts a great deal of AWS infrastructure on each coast).  AT&amp;T and Verizon are copying that efficient model, and they own their own facilities, cutting out one more middleman. The math seems simple to me, long term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baseball2001</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cloud-computing/i-saw-atts-cloud/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Baseball2001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1721983592#comment-45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The long term future of cloud infrastructures is probably in these facilities, and not with Google or Microsoft or Amazon.&quot;

Really? Because they have a shiny datacenter? You&#039;ve pretty much described most datacenters I&#039;ve been in. What makes ATT&#039;s so different from the above companies that they are going to take away market share?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The long term future of cloud infrastructures is probably in these facilities, and not with Google or Microsoft or Amazon.&#8221;</p>
<p>Really? Because they have a shiny datacenter? You&#8217;ve pretty much described most datacenters I&#8217;ve been in. What makes ATT&#8217;s so different from the above companies that they are going to take away market share?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
