<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Discussion on: Sadly, the PIX Firewall is Discontinued&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisco/sadly-the-pix-firewall-is-discontinued/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: MargaretRouse</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisco/sadly-the-pix-firewall-is-discontinued/#comment-43</link>
		<author>MargaretRouse</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisco/sadly-the-pix-firewall-is-discontinued/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Goodbye PIX and Polaroid instant film. Sigh....Time marches on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goodbye PIX and Polaroid instant film. Sigh&#8230;.Time marches on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Geek</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisco/sadly-the-pix-firewall-is-discontinued/#comment-42</link>
		<author>The Geek</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisco/sadly-the-pix-firewall-is-discontinued/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>The PIX was never meant for telcos and ISPs; it's an SMB solution and, I must say, a good one. We service a medium-sized health insurance service firm, a local bank with several branch offices, a credit union, and several other small to medium sized businesses in the financial and health care sectors that have sensitive data to protect. All of them have either a PIX 501 or 506 in place. NONE of them have ever been compromised and configuration/management has never been an issue. Here's my farewell: http://www.lockergnome.com/gnomewriter/2008/02/10/say-goodbye-to-an-old-friend-cisco-is-retiring-the-pix/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The PIX was never meant for telcos and ISPs; it&#8217;s an SMB solution and, I must say, a good one. We service a medium-sized health insurance service firm, a local bank with several branch offices, a credit union, and several other small to medium sized businesses in the financial and health care sectors that have sensitive data to protect. All of them have either a PIX 501 or 506 in place. NONE of them have ever been compromised and configuration/management has never been an issue. Here&#8217;s my farewell: &lt;a href="http://www.lockergnome.com/gnomewriter/2008/02/10/say-goodbye-to-an-old-friend-cisco-is-retiring-the-pix/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.lockergnome.com/gnomewriter/2008/02/10/say-goodbye-to-an-old-friend-cisco-is-retiring-the-pix/&lt;/a&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davis420</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisco/sadly-the-pix-firewall-is-discontinued/#comment-41</link>
		<author>Davis420</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisco/sadly-the-pix-firewall-is-discontinued/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Hi Toto-
I appreciate your comments!
Although I agree with all your points and while I would never recommend the PIX to anyone - I guess I just had some attachment knowing that it was always "there" :)
Thanks for reading!
-David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Toto-<br />
I appreciate your comments!<br />
Although I agree with all your points and while I would never recommend the PIX to anyone - I guess I just had some attachment knowing that it was always &#8220;there&#8221; <img src='http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisco/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Thanks for reading!<br />
-David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toto</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisco/sadly-the-pix-firewall-is-discontinued/#comment-40</link>
		<author>Toto</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 09:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisco/sadly-the-pix-firewall-is-discontinued/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Sadly?  You must be kidding.  PIX was never considered a viable scalable security solution and was never used in large telco environments such as Carriers or ISP's.  It is difficult to manage, counter intuitive to configure and its performance while good  does not surpass competing products in the same price/function range.  
PIX has been around for a while starting off on PC based systems (you needed a floppy disk to install or recover the unit!!!!) and its time is over, good riddance.
Lets hope cisco uses what it has learned from its experience and provides us with a better product, which ASA seems to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly?  You must be kidding.  PIX was never considered a viable scalable security solution and was never used in large telco environments such as Carriers or ISP&#8217;s.  It is difficult to manage, counter intuitive to configure and its performance while good  does not surpass competing products in the same price/function range.<br />
PIX has been around for a while starting off on PC based systems (you needed a floppy disk to install or recover the unit!!!!) and its time is over, good riddance.<br />
Lets hope cisco uses what it has learned from its experience and provides us with a better product, which ASA seems to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
