<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Discussion on: Cisco&#8217;s new 1861 Remote office router packs a punch!</title>
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisco/ciscos-new-1861-remote-office-router-packs-a-punch/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Most awesome router ever&#8221; - The Network Hub: A SearchNetworking.com blog</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisco/ciscos-new-1861-remote-office-router-packs-a-punch/#comment-4</link>
		<author>&#8220;Most awesome router ever&#8221; - The Network Hub: A SearchNetworking.com blog</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisco/ciscos-new-1861-remote-office-router-packs-a-punch/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>[...] with gadget lust? Would you shell out $200 for this sleek 802.11n router &#8212; or would you prefer something that looks more like, well, a router? (Hey, we thought routers were sexy all along.)      Digg This &#160;&#160;&#160;  Add to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] with gadget lust? Would you shell out $200 for this sleek 802.11n router &#8212; or would you prefer something that looks more like, well, a router? (Hey, we thought routers were sexy all along.)      Digg This &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  Add to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
