 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Can you hear me now? Tales from a Cisco voice instructor &#187; 802.11</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisco-voice/tag/80211/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisco-voice</link>
	<description>Tales from a Cisco voice instructor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 13:20:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Fast, Real Fast Wireless</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisco-voice/fast-real-fast-wireless/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisco-voice/fast-real-fast-wireless/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 22:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Bateman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[802.11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisco-voice/?p=2351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the years the speed of wireless networking has increased. I remember when it maxed out at 11 Mbps and it served most everyone just fine. Many wired connections were still running 10 Mbps, so no one really noticed. Then 100 Mbps wired connections starting becoming popular and all of the sudden wireless seemed slow. [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the years the speed of wireless networking has increased. I remember when it maxed out at 11 Mbps and it served most everyone just fine. Many wired connections were still running 10 Mbps, so no one really noticed. Then 100 Mbps wired connections starting becoming popular and all of the sudden wireless seemed slow. Over the years it has increased, but never seemed to keep up with the speed a wired connection could offer.</p>
<p>Some folks in Japan are trying to speed up wireless transmission rates to speeds once thought impossible. They are using what they refer to as the <em>“T-ray” band</em>. It is a section of electromagnetic spectrum that falls between 300 GHz and 3 THz. By using this band, they have been able to achieve speeds of 3GB/sec. That&#8217;s pretty darn fast. However, you shouldn&#8217;t get too excited just yet. You won&#8217;t be seeing a &#8220;T-ray&#8221; router at Walmart anytime soon. Right now it is just a proof of concept and it&#8217;s range it pretty short. But I think it is a glimpse of things to come.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisco-voice/fast-real-fast-wireless/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Need a Faster Router?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisco-voice/need-a-faster-router/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisco-voice/need-a-faster-router/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Bateman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[802.11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Router]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisco-voice/?p=2329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you find yourself transferring large files between devices over your wireless network and feel it just takes too long, you might want to checkout Netgear&#8217;s newest router when it comes out next month. They claim that you could see speeds of 1GB. That&#8217;s fast &#8211; so fast I am not really sure why I [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you find yourself transferring large files between devices over your wireless network and feel it just takes too long, you might want to checkout Netgear&#8217;s newest router when it comes out next month. They claim that you could see speeds of 1GB. That&#8217;s fast &#8211; so fast I am not really sure why I would need it. Currently I am transferring data at my home at around 54MB. I don&#8217;t feel I am waiting too long for anything, but I am sure there are those out there that will feel they just have to have one.</p>
<div id="attachment_2330" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 245px"><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/143/files/2012/04/r6300.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-2330" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/143/files/2012/04/r6300.png" alt="Netgear R6300" width="235" height="230" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Netgear R6300</p></div>
<p>For those of you that do find the need for that kind of speed, the device you will be looking for is called a R6300. It is based on the 802.11ac technology, so in order to get those kinds of speed your other devices will need to be 802.11ac as well. Currently that is going to be a little hard to do since it officially isn&#8217;t even a standard yet. That should occur later this year, but that doesn&#8217;t seem to be stopping some companies from adopting it. It has been rumored that Apple may support this technology in its airport products later this year.</p>
<p>So, if you need to be on the bleeding edge and have the fastest, you should get ready to order the Netgear R6300 next month. By the way, it will set you back about 200 bucks.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisco-voice/need-a-faster-router/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
