 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sister CISA CISSP &#187; Security Devices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/tag/security-devices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:25:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>A Free Tool for Testing Your Firewalls and Routers</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/a-free-tool-for-testing-your-firewalls-and-routers/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/a-free-tool-for-testing-your-firewalls-and-routers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 18:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arian Eigen Heald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[firewalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[routers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools & Tricks of the Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools for Auditing and Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/?p=343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see a LOT of firewall configuration files and router configuration files. It&#8217;s the bane of my auditor&#8217;s existence to read through a PIX firewall config (up to 500 pages of a text file). After the 35th page of text, you could drive a truck through that firewall while I tried to wake up. Plus, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see a LOT of firewall configuration files and router configuration files.  It&#8217;s the bane of my auditor&#8217;s existence to read through a PIX firewall config (up to 500 pages of a text file).  After the 35th page of text, you could drive a truck through that firewall while I tried to wake up.</p>
<p>Plus, I can&#8217;t just log on to the firewall and look at it, oh no.  I&#8217;m an auditor, and we aren&#8217;t trusted with such things (probably just as well). So, when I find a tool that will look at the configuration text file, analyze it and give me a nice HTML report, I want to throw a party.</p>
<p>Allow me to introduce <a href="http://nipper.titania.co.uk/">Nipper.</a> It takes a microsecond to turn out an absolutely superb report (and found things I missed!). AND it doesn&#8217;t just do Cisco, it also handles Nortel, Sonicwall, Juniper and Nokia.  I&#8217;m in love.  AND I gave the guy $50.00. I hope he had a party for himself. What an awesome piece of work. </p>
<p>It runs in Linux or Windows, and somebody else built a GUI front end, if command line makes your eyes cross. Grab your config files and see what <em>you </em>might have missed.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/a-free-tool-for-testing-your-firewalls-and-routers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Beginning of the End for PIN Codes</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/the-beginning-of-the-end-for-pin-codes/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/the-beginning-of-the-end-for-pin-codes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arian Eigen Heald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Automatic Theft Machines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Breaches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCI DSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Devices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/?p=310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday Wired released a story that reveals a startling detail about the TJMaxx data breach: hackers were able to cash in on stolen debit cards because they had a way to crack PINS. This &#8220;minor detail&#8221; was buried in an affadavit last year, but Wired has put it together with some other information afloat on [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday Wired released a <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2009/04/pins.html">story</a> that reveals a startling detail about the TJMaxx data breach: hackers were able to cash in on stolen debit cards because they had a way to crack PINS.</p>
<p>This &#8220;minor detail&#8221; was buried in an affadavit last year, but Wired has put it together with some other information afloat on the NET, and the article is a really good read on what happens to your PIN from your debit card as it transits various networks to receive approval. Your PIN gets decrypted and re-encrypted by a Hardware Security Module (HSM) each time it transits a network. Lots of opportunities for capture with the help of an insider or some sniffing malware.</p>
<p><em>&#8220;While statistically not a large percentage&#8230;in 2008, attacks against PIN information represent individual data-theft cases having the largest aggregate exposure in terms of unique records,&#8221; says the report. &#8220;In other words, PIN-based attacks and many of the very large compromises from the past year go hand in hand.&#8221;</p>
<p>Although there are ways to mitigate the attacks, experts say the problem can only really be resolved if the financial industry overhauls the entire payment processing system.</em></p>
<p>Ouch.</p>
<p>Clearly, PIN-based authentication has been cracked, and will be cracked more and more.  Leave your debit card at home and Pay Cash Instead.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/the-beginning-of-the-end-for-pin-codes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making it Easy For Hackers</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/making-it-easy-for-hackers/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/making-it-easy-for-hackers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arian Eigen Heald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Breaches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Devices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/?p=275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How many rules do you have in your firewall? How many rules allow access directly into your network? How many rules allow ANY/ANY? The more rules you have in your firewall rulebase, the higher your risk of allowing attackers in. I&#8217;m not talking about opening access to your webserver in the DMZ. But the rules [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many rules do you have in your firewall?  How many rules allow access directly into your network? How many rules allow ANY/ANY?</p>
<p>The more rules you have in your firewall rulebase, the higher your risk of allowing attackers in.  I&#8217;m not talking about opening access to your webserver in the DMZ. But the rules are not <em>linear</em>, which many people (including some professionals) do not understand.</p>
<p>Firewall rules are inherited, like Access Control Rules, so that you can end up with some <em>unintended</em> consequences. If the ANY/ANY rule is above the tighter rules, the ANY/ANY rule will prevail.  This is exactly what happened in a rulebase I looked at not too long ago. The company was not convinced until we ran a packet capture and I could demonstrate that IP addresses from Russia AND China were banging on internal IP addresses.</p>
<p>Allowing ingress to your internal network using any protocol is fraught with peril. Terminal Services/RDP allowed in? Somebody will be running scripts against the Administrator ID trying to log in all the time.  FTP? There are too many ways to badly configure an FTP server. That&#8217;s what a DMZ is for. So is your Outlook Web Access. If any internal server is compromised, it becomes a jumping off point into the rest of your network. This goes for printers, too, which have little miniature hard drives.</p>
<p>ANY/ANY rules are red flags to the auditor &#8211; they tell me someone is sloppy, and hasn&#8217;t taken the time to ascertain what ports are absolutely necessary to open. Yes, we&#8217;re all busy, but think how busy you will be cleaning up after hackers.  Or, worse yet, cleaning up your resume on the unemployment line.</p>
<p>Have a rule labeled TEMP?  Put an expiration date and a contact person in the notes. If you are run over by the turnip truck, the next engineer will have a clue as to what is going on and will offer up burnt offerings in gratitude. </p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/making-it-easy-for-hackers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Securing the Security Devices</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/securing-the-security-devices/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/securing-the-security-devices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 15:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arian Eigen Heald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA["How Do You Know?"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Admins and Auditors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware & InfoSec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT audit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TCM (Truly Clueless Management)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools & Tricks of the Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools for Auditing and Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/securing-the-security-devices/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, so you&#8217;ve bought the glow-in-the-dark, meets all the compliance requirements and looks really shiny &#8220;security solution&#8221; from a vendor (one or many). Or maybe your management has bought it and presented it to you as a fait accompli. (Hope I&#8217;m spelling that fancy French right!) And of course either you have to manage it [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, so you&#8217;ve bought the glow-in-the-dark, meets all the compliance requirements and looks really shiny &#8220;security solution&#8221; from  a vendor (one or many).</p>
<p>Or maybe your management has bought it and presented it to you as a fait accompli.  (Hope I&#8217;m spelling that fancy French right!) And of course either you have to manage it (without training, &#8220;that&#8217;s too expensive, just watch the consultants put it in&#8221;), or it&#8217;s been &#8220;outsourced.&#8221;</p>
<p>Or as an auditor, you&#8217;ve been told to use it for all auditing functions, and not worry about doing any follow up or periodic testing because this product is such a &#8220;time-saver.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, <em>how do you know</em> (my favorite question) it&#8217;s working and doing a good job? Not what the fancy report it produces says, not what the consultant says, not what the manual says, not what the boss says. What you can actually see.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been following a discussion on the Security Focus &#8220;pen-test&#8221; mailing list about how security software has just as many issues as regular software.  I don&#8217;t like thinking that the software protecting me and writing to a SQL database is using an unencrypted ODBC connection that can be captured by ARP poisoning.</p>
<p>So, although I am rarely asked to audit or test a firewall, IDS or host IDS, having run and learned on all of them, I have some suggestions for you to try out.</p>
<p><strong>NEXT:  How to Audit Your IDS/Firewall/ECM for free. </strong></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/securing-the-security-devices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on ATMs &#8211; The Daily Store Owner Log</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/more-on-atms-the-daily-store-owner-log/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/more-on-atms-the-daily-store-owner-log/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arian Eigen Heald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Automatic Theft Machines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DataManagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware & InfoSec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identity theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stupid Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/more-on-atms-the-daily-store-owner-log/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you know that a store that puts in an ATM for customer use also provides a daily log of transactions to the owner? The log includes the Bank name, last four numbers of the account, the customer name, and the transaction. So if I do an account balance request, that comes up in the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you know that a store that puts in an ATM for customer use also provides a daily log of transactions to the owner?  The log includes the Bank name, last four numbers of the account, the customer name, and the transaction.</p>
<p>So if I do an account balance request, that comes up in the log.  <strong>The amount in my account comes up in the log.</strong></p>
<p>The log includes all transactions done on that machine, so everyone&#8217;s name, Bank name, how much they have, how much they took out, etc, is all there on the log.</p>
<p>I was chatting with an acquaintance who owns a store in Maine, and she pretty much knows everyone who comes in her store.  When she had an ATM put in, after numerous customer requests, she began getting those daily reports (probably because she gets a percentage of transactions). She was embarrassed at how much information she could see about people she knows.  I would be, too. </p>
<p>Where does this report get stored?  Who has access to the reports? The manager?  The clerks?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an acronym I really like:  TMI   (TOO MUCH INFORMATION)</p>
<p>Why does a store owner need that much information?  I&#8217;ll try and find out.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/more-on-atms-the-daily-store-owner-log/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Host vs. Network IDS</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/host-vs-network-ids/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/host-vs-network-ids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arian Eigen Heald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Admins and Auditors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT audit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools & Tricks of the Trade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/host-vs-network-ids/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve noticed a definite tendency for organizations to move to monitoring network traffic with their Intrusion Detection Systems. It&#8217;s a lot easier than trying to update a host IDS service/agent and keeps the increased CPU at the monitor, where it belongs. Also, host agents are limited by what the operating system is willing to log. [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed a definite tendency for organizations to move to monitoring network traffic with their Intrusion Detection Systems. It&#8217;s a lot easier than trying to update a host IDS service/agent and keeps the increased CPU at the monitor, where it belongs.  Also, host agents are limited by what the operating system is willing to log.</p>
<p>Windows, for instance, will give you hundreds of logging messages that actually have no useful information for an IT Admin or Auditor to review.  The setup of their Event Log auditing mechanism is still klugy, outdated and difficult to interpret. (Micro$oft, are you listening?).  I can&#8217;t say I get to wow about UNIX either, and FORGET anything like logging with Novell.</p>
<p>So, why bother? I still think that a host IDS has a place, because there are things it can watch for that you will only see on the <em>server</em>. For instance, if someone is doing brute-force against the administrator account. If someone has made Active Directory changes who should not be in there.</p>
<p>How would you tell if someone added themselves to the Server Operator group? (where I&#8217;d go to look around and maybe get my hands on a SAM database). If you&#8217;ve got an Event Log monitoring function, you could pick it up that way, but wouldn&#8217;t it be nice if the IDS would pick it up? If you just installed a host IDS on certain critical servers?  There&#8217;s lots of options if you step out of the all-or-nothing approach.</p>
<p>Speaking of which, monitoring development and test servers really does have to be included.  As much as we&#8217;d like to forget that they&#8217;re there, that&#8217;s the first place hackers look.  As a penetration tester, I can attest to that, as well. Patch &#8216;em, monitor &#8216;em, they&#8217;re on YOUR network.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/host-vs-network-ids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>European Hotel Chain Has Their Customer Data For the Past Year Accessed</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/european-hotel-chain-has-all-their-customer-data-for-the-past-year-stolen/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/european-hotel-chain-has-all-their-customer-data-for-the-past-year-stolen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arian Eigen Heald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Breaches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identity theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Devices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/european-hotel-chain-has-all-their-customer-data-for-the-past-year-stolen/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Visited Europe in the last year and used a Best Western Hotel? Your credit card, expiration date, the company that employs you, your name, address and future bookings may be in the possession of a Russian Mafia website. An enterprising Scottish newspaper, the Sunday Herald, noticed on Thursday night that an Indian hacker offered to [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Visited Europe in the last year and used a Best Western Hotel? Your credit card, expiration date, the company that employs you, your name, address and future bookings may be in the possession of a Russian Mafia website. An enterprising Scottish newspaper, the Sunday Herald, noticed on Thursday night that an Indian hacker offered to sell access to Best Western and notified Best Western about the breach.  Although Best Western closed the hole on Friday, the horse is out of the barn.</p>
<p>Eight million people stayed at 1,312 locations from 2007.  Is this &#8220;Identity Theft?&#8221; It&#8217;s a darned nice start.  Only the Social Security number is missing. Certainly the names, addresses, business information, details of employment, credit card numbers and expiration dates could be used for <a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/synthetic-identity-theft-part-1/">synthetic identity theft.</a></p>
<p>According to the <a href="http://sundayherald.com/news/heraldnews/display.var.2432225.0.0.php">Herald:</a></p>
<p><em>&#8220;The Sunday Herald understands that a hacker from India &#8211; new to the world of cyber-crime &#8211; succeeded in bypassing the system&#8217;s security software and placing a Trojan virus on one of the Best Western Hotel machines used for reservations. The next time a member of staff logged in, her username and password were collected and stored.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>One of the first things I learned doing penetration testing was that you don&#8217;t have to have some fancy piece of coding to break in.  It can be the simplest thing &#8211; finding a set of keys in someone&#8217;s desk &#8211; that gets you into the server room. In fact, it usually IS the simplest thing.  Their web site may have great security, but that was easily bypassed by a user login.</p>
<p>Best Western evidently had not noticed all the activity that account was generating &#8211; sucking all the data out of their databases.  Which takes us back to auditing databases, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>Best Western&#8217;s response?  <em>Tim Wade, head of marketing for Best Western GB, said it was “unlikely” that whoever was responsible got hold of the details of “every booking at every hotel” in Europe because of the way their system worked.</em> Has anyone mentioned to Best Western that letting a marketing guy handle communications for a data breach is not always the best choice? &#8220;Unlikely&#8221; is not a word that I find comforting. What are the facts? Why don&#8217;t they know exactly how much was taken? Because they probably don&#8217;t have any security logging in the right place. It&#8217;s why they didn&#8217;t notice the breach in the first place.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope they didn&#8217;t get all the way into the American side of the company. Or maybe they have.  How would we know?</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/european-hotel-chain-has-all-their-customer-data-for-the-past-year-stolen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ATMs &#8211; Automated Theft Machines</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/atms-automated-theft-machines/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/atms-automated-theft-machines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arian Eigen Heald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Automatic Theft Machines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eigen's Rules of Thumb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware & InfoSec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identity theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Devices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/atms-automated-theft-machines/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s absolutely fascinating (in a nerve-wracking sort of way) to read about how many different ways there are to use ATMs to capture (and steal) accounts and PIN numbers. From there, it takes very little time to create a fraudulent card and spend what you can before the bank catches up. It&#8217;s a triumph of [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s absolutely fascinating (in a nerve-wracking sort of way) to read about how many different ways there are to use ATMs to capture (and steal) accounts and PIN numbers. From there, it takes very little time to create a fraudulent card and spend what you can before the bank catches up. It&#8217;s a triumph of hardware over software.  Thieves simply work around the software controls to capture the information they want.</p>
<p>For example, the concept of &#8220;skimming.&#8221; Typically, thieves attach a device to the outside of the ATM that records the magnetic stripe information as you insert it.  They also need a camera of some sort to capture the PIN as you type it in.  For a classic example, with <a href="http://www.snopes.com/fraud/atm/atmcamera.asp">pictures</a> you can see that the card skimmer fits in front of the regular card slot. For PINs, the clever placement of a pinhole wireless camera makes it all way too easy.</p>
<p>Thieves tend to get endlessly creative: One <a href="http://www.atmmarketplace.com/article.php?id=2693">fellow</a> bought his own ATM equipment and kept moving it around from place to place in order to capture information. He was good enough at it to collect at least $4 million, and is still at large.</p>
<p>More losses come from retail ATMs (those found in supermarkets, convenience stores, gas stations, or other non-banking environments) where there are less stringent controls and only casual observers. In May of this year, <a href="http://www.nbc11.com/news/16424705/detail.html">the ATM at one gas station was rigged</a>, with at least 80 victims. When he was finally apprended, he had stolen more than $185,000. Ouch.</p>
<p>There are about 360,000 ATMs in the United States, according to <a href="http://www.bankrate.com/brm/news/atm/20021004a2.asp">Bankrate.com</a> Only half of them are at a bank. </p>
<p>The ATM designers are moving to internal card readers and other techniques to eliminate external skimming devices, but when you can buy your own ATM and move it around, controls on sales of such machines must be tightened.</p>
<p>Rule of Thumb: If I don&#8217;t go to the bank for gas, I won&#8217;t go to the gas station for money.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/atms-automated-theft-machines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firewalls Part IV &#8211; Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/firewalls-part-iv-quis-custodiet-ipsos-custodes/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/firewalls-part-iv-quis-custodiet-ipsos-custodes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 13:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arian Eigen Heald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Admins and Auditors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT audit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steps to an Easy Audit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools & Tricks of the Trade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/firewalls-part-iv-quis-custodiet-ipsos-custodes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who guards the guardians? Good IT governance mandates oversight of all IT functions. The firewall tends to be neglected, because it appears to be such a back-office function that only engineers or admins actually see and work on. However, it is one of the most critical pieces of the IT infrastructure. As a result, the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who guards the guardians? Good IT governance mandates oversight of all IT functions.  The firewall tends to be neglected, because it appears to be such a back-office function that only engineers or admins actually see and work on.</p>
<p>However, it is one of the most critical pieces of the IT infrastructure.  As a result, the following steps ought to be put in place:</p>
<p>1.)  <strong>Administrative access</strong> &#8211; Too many shops use one ID (&#8220;admin&#8221;) and password. Each person who accesses the firewall should have a unique ID and very strong password that should be changed more frequently than the standard policy.  All administrative access to the firewall should be logged, and the logs stored separately for review.</p>
<p>Access should be reviewed at least annually to confirm no inappropriate users have been allowed access and signed off as reviewed by management.</p>
<p>2.)  <strong>Changes </strong>- Too often firewall rules get changed &#8220;on the fly&#8221; or as the result of a phone call from a panicked person in the board room who can&#8217;t get to his demo site or custom application.  Tough nookies.  All changes to the firewall rulebase should go through change controls.  Emergency change controls should go further up the management tree for approval, not just the network manager. This way it&#8217;s documented as to who asked for what, who did it, and who approved.  It will make people think ahead and think twice before saying, &#8220;just open it up.&#8221;</p>
<p>Many firewalls can be enabled to send an email every time a rule is changed, added or deleted.  This should be enabled immediately so that a management person (ideally, the ISO) is notified. This will also help eliminate admins giving themselves a convenient back door into the network.</p>
<p>A rulebase review should be conducted quarterly with management sign-off.  It helps them be aware and start to understand what a firewall is really doing for the business.</p>
<p>3.) <strong>Monitoring the Logs</strong> &#8211; Firewall logs are a goldmine of information.  Ideally you have a system for collecting the logs for analysis and storage with a third-party application.  Someone should be looking at them every day.  If the organization is smart, they have a product that can store, analyze and correlate logs from servers, routers, IDSes and firewalls. One stop shopping that everyone can review &#8211; including management. (Well, you can offer!) Make sure the designated person is logged or signs off on such reviews &#8211; then your audit will be a snap.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/firewalls-part-iv-quis-custodiet-ipsos-custodes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Not Your Mother&#8217;s Firewall Anymore &#8211; Part III</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/its-not-your-mothers-firewall-anymore-part-iii/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/its-not-your-mothers-firewall-anymore-part-iii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 12:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arian Eigen Heald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Admins and Auditors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT audit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steps to an Easy Audit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/its-not-your-mothers-firewall-anymore-part-iii/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When all is said and done, a configuring a firewall comes down to creating a set of rules. Firewalls are bi-directional &#8211; they control traffic going out (outbound) to the Internet (or the DMZ) and they control traffic coming in (inbound) to the network or the DMZ. You are configuring for WHO, WHAT, WHERE and [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When all is said and done, a configuring a firewall comes down to creating a set of rules.  Firewalls are bi-directional &#8211; they control traffic going out (outbound) to the Internet (or the DMZ) and they control traffic coming in (inbound) to the network or the DMZ. You are configuring for WHO, WHAT, WHERE and WHY.</p>
<p>WHO &#8211; in firewalls, everything is identified by IP address, whether it&#8217;s a single server or internal subnets.  Firewalls have a category called &#8220;ANY,&#8221; which is a &#8220;red flag to the bull&#8221; for an IT Auditor.  &#8220;ANY&#8221; is short for ANYBODY. Do you want anybody on the Internet to have access to something on your internal network?  It&#8217;s sloppy work on the part of anyone who is configuring the firewall to use &#8220;ANY.&#8221;  It means they didn&#8217;t take the time to specifically identify parties who need to access the network.  The absolute only time the use of &#8220;ANY&#8221; is justified is when you have a web server you want customers to come to (think amazon.com, or ebay.com).  And you can bet those folks don&#8217;t have their web servers inside with their corporate databases &#8211; those web servers are sitting alone in a DMZ.  </p>
<p>&#8220;ANY&#8221; doesn&#8217;t work for outbound traffic either &#8211; you want to identify your internal subnets so that you can LOG who is going outbound and to WHERE.  This is how Hannaford might have caught their hackers &#8211; the hackers were sending an outbound text file to somewhere in Europe from a store server &#8211; that could have set off an alarm. (Apologies to Hannaford; hindsight is, of course, 20-20 vision.)</p>
<p>WHAT &#8211; Applications on servers and other network devices respond by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_number">port number.</a>  There are 65,535 ports for UDP connections and 65,535 TCP connections. (I know this number by heart from the days when I did tech support for a firewall company.) Commonly, web servers use port 80/TCP. Theoretically, a server could be listening on all ports, but it will only listen on the ports that are running services on the server.  If you are not running IIS or Apache, your server will not be listening on port 80 for connection requests.</p>
<p>So, here&#8217;s another place not to use ANY. Don&#8217;t allow hackers to bang away on every conceivable port.  If you are only using FTP, disable web services, and allow traffic only to port 21/22. (Applications can use more than one port). Be specific about what services people can get to from the Internet.</p>
<p>Outbound, you may want to use the firewall to limit things like Peer-2-Peer networking, instant messaging, IRQ, video streaming, etc. There are also certain blocks of IP addresses you might want to bar access to, such as the entire netblock in Russia that hosts so many hacker applications.</p>
<p>WHERE &#8211; If you know WHAT, you also know WHERE.  Be specific about what IP addresses can get to what on your DMZ and your internal network.  If your email server in the DMZ is delivering to an internal email server, make it a rule from one IP address to the other.  If clients want to connect or deliver data, request the specific IP addresses the client will be using.  Will it be more work?  Yes. But you will know exactly who came in, where they can go and what they are using. </p>
<p>Can hacker applications use standard ports?  Absolutely.  They often use port 80 since it is so commonly allowed in and out.  Applications can be configured or coded to use non-standard ports. A good application firewall should catch some of this, and an IDS can catch the rest.</p>
<p>Finally WHY.  I see too many configurations with rules labeled &#8220;test&#8221; or &#8220;demo,&#8221; with nothing in the comments section.  Every rule should have a business owner AND a description.  What are you testing?  When does the test end? Who is testing what? If the cost of managing the firewall goes up because of a business application, this is your justification for getting extra funds from the business, AND a great opportunity to educate them. </p>
<p>Opening the firewall to let in &#8220;just the printer?&#8221;  Is the printer connected to the rest of your network?  Then you&#8217;ve just opened a hacker rest stop.  Printers have hard drives and usually a default web server and FTP as well.</p>
<p>Next:  <strong>Management Oversight of Firewalls</strong></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cisa-cissp/its-not-your-mothers-firewall-anymore-part-iii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
